Wednesday, 26 August 2026
Constituency questions
Western Victoria Region
-
Commencement
-
Announcements
-
Papers
-
Production of documents
-
Business of the house
-
Members statements
-
Bills
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Questions on notice
-
Constituency questions
-
Petitions
-
Business of the house
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Business of the house
-
Adjournment
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
Western Victoria Region
Bev McARTHUR (Western Victoria) (12:56): (2549) My question is for the Minister for Planning. Geelong council has deferred a draft place-naming policy that prioritises Aboriginal names and requires 70 per cent of places named after individuals each year to recognise women or gender-diverse people. I respect the importance of appropriately acknowledging traditional owners and recognising the contributions of women and others, but Victoria’s statutory naming rules state that all naming principles are equally important, that names should link to place and, crucially, that community support matters. Will the minister ask the register of geographic names to clarify publicly whether councils are required to adopt such hierarchies or targets and confirm that local relevance and genuine community support must remain central to every naming decision?