Thursday, 23 June 2022
Adjournment
Glenelg Shire Council rates
-
Commencement
-
Announcements
-
Acknowledgement of country
-
-
Members
-
Mr Limbrick
-
Swearing in
-
-
-
Members statements
-
Queen’s Birthday honours
-
Chisholm Institute
-
Commercial passenger vehicle industry
-
Small business support
-
Multicultural communities
-
Paula Fox Melanoma and Cancer Centre
-
Garry Spry OAM
-
Queen’s Birthday honours
-
Gippsland community sports facilities
-
Gippsland Ranges Roller Derby
-
Billy Button Children’s Centre
-
Queen’s Birthday honours
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Bills
-
Gambling and Liquor Legislation Amendment Bill 2022
-
Second reading
-
Third reading
-
-
Child Employment Amendment Bill 2022
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Thornhill Park transport infrastructure
-
Ministers statements: Victoria Legal Aid
-
Department of Justice and Community Safety workplace safety
-
Greyhound racing
-
Ministers statements: Workforce Training Innovation Fund
-
Deer control
-
Ministers statements: early childhood education
-
Early childhood education
-
Ministers statements: suburban development
-
Written responses
-
Constituency questions
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
South Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Bills
-
Child Employment Amendment Bill 2022
-
Committee
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Dr RATNAM
- Mr ONDARCHIE
- Ms SYMES
- Mr MEDDICK
- Ms SYMES
- Mr MEDDICK
- Ms SYMES
- Mr MEDDICK
- Ms SYMES
- Mr MEDDICK
- Ms SYMES
- Ms SYMES
-
Third reading
-
Casino and Liquor Legislation Amendment Bill 2022
-
Third reading
-
Children and Health Legislation Amendment (Statement of Recognition and Other Matters) Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Education Legislation Amendment (Adult and Community Education and Other Matters) Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Local Government Legislation Amendment (Rating and Other Matters) Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Sustainable Forests Timber Amendment (Timber Harvesting Safety Zones) Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Treaty Authority and Other Treaty Elements Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Adjournment
-
Greater Shepparton Secondary College
-
COVID-19 vaccination
-
Attwood police patrols
-
The Wellington Collingwood
-
Glenelg Shire Council rates
-
Growing Suburbs Fund
-
Health system
-
Electric vehicles
-
Perry Broad
-
Nepean Highway, Frankston, speed limit
-
Responses
-
Glenelg Shire Council rates
Mrs McARTHUR (Western Victoria) (17:42): (2015) My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Local Government and concerns the extraordinary increase in rates proposed by the Glenelg shire and included in the draft budget due to be discussed and voted on by councillors next week. The Andrews government boasted that the introduction of its Fair Go Rates cap in 2016–17 would prevent councils from socking ratepayers with above-inflation bill hikes. The cap for the 2022–23 year is 1.75 per cent, yet despite this and despite the glaring fact that this draft budget from Glenelg promises no new council services to hard-pressed ratepayers, it shows the total rate revenue will increase from $25.1 million to a staggering $28.8 million. That is an awful lot more than 1.75 per cent. It is an extra $3.7 million, or 14.7 per cent to be exact. On top of significant increases last year, this proposal would make the Glenelg shire one of Victoria’s highest taxing regional councils. What is this if not a mockery of the Fair Go Rates policy? More than $3.5 million for no new services—it has been described to me as a blatant money grab.
I also want to comment on the effect on farmers, who appear in current drafts to be worse affected even than other ratepayers. While the average general rate will increase to $2065, representing a 20 per cent increase, for farmers it is even higher. Their rise is nearly 25 per cent. It is a huge cost. Many already pay tens of thousands of dollars for very little service and will now see rate increases—not total rates—well into five figures. Tens of thousands of dollars more for what? For some, rates will become the biggest annual cost beyond even fertiliser or bills or employee costs, so how can we expect these businesses to operate in this environment? If the Glenelg shire is allowed to exploit a technicality, ditch the Fair Go principle and arbitrarily increase rates by tens of thousands of dollars, why would anyone want to do business there? Minister, the action I seek is a further assessment by you of the Glenelg shire’s proposed budget and its compliance with the letter and spirit of the Andrews government’s Fair Go policy.