Thursday, 1 June 2023
Adjournment
Land tax
-
Commencement
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
- Notices
-
Adjournment
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
National Reconciliation Week
-
Piano Transformation Design Challenge
-
Vietnamese community celebrations
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region citizenship ceremonies
-
E-cigarettes
-
Bernice Hogarth
-
Dairy industry
-
National ploughing championships
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Ceylonese Welfare Organisation
-
Boer War Day
-
Boer War Day
-
Public Administration and Planning Legislation Amendment (Control of Lobbyists) Bill 2023
-
Port Melbourne public housing
-
National Reconciliation Week
-
Social housing
-
-
Production of documents
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
-
Energy Legislation Amendment (Electricity Outage Emergency Response and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Third reading
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
Workplace safety
-
Ministers statements: National Reconciliation Week
-
Timber industry
-
Timber industry
-
Ministers statements: flood recovery initiatives
-
Timber industry
-
Albury Wodonga Health
-
Ministers statements: open space funding
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Education system
-
Ministers statements: TAFE funding
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Bills
-
Children and Health Legislation Amendment (Statement of Recognition, Aboriginal Self-determination and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Third reading
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Committees
-
Procedure Committee
-
Reference
-
-
-
Adjournment
-
Flood recovery initiatives
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Gender transition
-
Belmore School
-
Cost of living
-
Land tax
-
Bus network
-
Burwood post office
-
Duck hunting
-
Health workforce
-
Timber industry
-
Wire rope barriers
-
Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
-
Progress Street, Dandenong South, level crossing
-
Timber industry
-
Responses
-
Land tax
Evan MULHOLLAND (Northern Metropolitan) (15:50): (276) My adjournment this afternoon is seeking action of the Treasurer. The action I seek is for the Treasurer to acknowledge the untold damage his new renters tax will have on Victorians already struggling with the housing crisis and have some introspection and drop this proposed new renters tax. Let us be clear about the impact of the Labor Party’s new renters tax. The cost of the average rental property is going to go up by $1300 per year every year for 10 years. That price will inevitably be paid by renters. It will be paid with higher asking prices for rents, and it will be paid with a further reduction in our rapidly diminishing supply of rentals here in Victoria.
I have been taking a very active role, as I know my colleague Mr Davis has, in the stamp duty inquiry by the Economy and Infrastructure Committee, listening to the experts and getting their views on what new land taxes will do to investments. One of the experts, the CEO of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria Quentin Kilian, said on the renters tax that supply is where we need to be focusing, not disincentivising, and that by further diminishing supply we are going to put further pressure on finding a home.
Then we saw the Treasurer saying that he is open to a new rent cap, a policy the policy experts argued against in the strongest terms. Whether it was the Urban Development Institute of Australia – Victoria, the Housing Industry Association, the Grattan Institute or the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, the message was the same: a rent cap undermines the housing market, it undermines investment and new supply and it is the biggest driver of rent increases. We simply cannot afford to have a rent cap when vacancy rates are trending south of 1 per cent.
As we have seen overseas – the Greens might want to check it out – in San Francisco, for example, Stanford economists found that in the long run rent caps drove rents up, not down, because they led to a number of landlords converting their housing to other uses and this further reduced the supply of rental units. The Grattan Institute in particular had the same astute warnings. They said supply shortages drive homelessness, with the result that people end up in caravans and tents. It is devastating, particularly in situations where there is domestic violence where people have to escape and there is nowhere to go. They basically said it would lead to a two-tier rental market, with those in rent-controlled apartments paying less but getting lower quality housing.
When the Greens show a lack of understanding of economics, it is just your average sitting day. But I am terrified that this kind of proposal has attracted the interest of the Treasurer. The action I seek from the Treasurer is to drop this ludicrous proposal, rule out a rent cap and scrap his new rental tax.