Thursday, 1 June 2023
Questions without notice and ministers statements
Workplace safety
-
Commencement
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
- Notices
-
Adjournment
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
National Reconciliation Week
-
Piano Transformation Design Challenge
-
Vietnamese community celebrations
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region citizenship ceremonies
-
E-cigarettes
-
Bernice Hogarth
-
Dairy industry
-
National ploughing championships
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Ceylonese Welfare Organisation
-
Boer War Day
-
Boer War Day
-
Public Administration and Planning Legislation Amendment (Control of Lobbyists) Bill 2023
-
Port Melbourne public housing
-
National Reconciliation Week
-
Social housing
-
-
Production of documents
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
-
Energy Legislation Amendment (Electricity Outage Emergency Response and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Third reading
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
Workplace safety
-
Ministers statements: National Reconciliation Week
-
Timber industry
-
Timber industry
-
Ministers statements: flood recovery initiatives
-
Timber industry
-
Albury Wodonga Health
-
Ministers statements: open space funding
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Education system
-
Ministers statements: TAFE funding
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Bills
-
Children and Health Legislation Amendment (Statement of Recognition, Aboriginal Self-determination and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Third reading
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Committees
-
Procedure Committee
-
Reference
-
-
-
Adjournment
-
Flood recovery initiatives
-
Schools payroll tax
-
Gender transition
-
Belmore School
-
Cost of living
-
Land tax
-
Bus network
-
Burwood post office
-
Duck hunting
-
Health workforce
-
Timber industry
-
Wire rope barriers
-
Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
-
Progress Street, Dandenong South, level crossing
-
Timber industry
-
Responses
-
Workplace safety
Rachel PAYNE (South-Eastern Metropolitan) (12:04): (170) My question is for Minister Pearson in the other place, represented in this house by the Attorney-General. Non-disclosure agreements, otherwise known as confidentiality agreements, are frequently used in settlement of workplace sexual harassment and often take the form of a settlement deed, where financial compensation is offered in exchange for silence and a resignation. It means that victims are forced out of the workplace when it should be the other way around, and it means that employers can duck their obligations to provide a safe workplace and enable repeat offending, all while preventing victims from talking about their abuse. Last year the then workplace safety minister Ms Stitt announced proposed reforms in response to a ministerial task force investigation. So my question is: what steps has the minister taken to progress legislation to restrict the use of non-disclosure agreements in sexual harassment cases?
Jaclyn SYMES (Northern Victoria – Attorney-General, Minister for Emergency Services) (12:05): I thank Ms Payne for her question. It is an incredibly important issue, and I do thank the former ministers responsible, particularly Minister Stitt, in relation to the important work that that task force did. They certainly looked at non-disclosure agreements. It is a very complex area of reform. I have had many people talk to me about whether you ban them, whether you restrict them. It is something that the government has committed in principle to advancing. It is something that I am interested in in the Attorney portfolio and Minister Pearson in his workplace safety role, and the Minister for Women is also quite interested. There are ongoing conversations about this topic. It is complex. It does require a lot of continued discussions. I would welcome further discussions with you, and I am sure Minister Pearson would as well.
Rachel PAYNE (South-Eastern Metropolitan) (12:06): I thank the Attorney for her response. By way of supplementary, I simply ask: when are we likely to see reform of this type?
Jaclyn SYMES (Northern Victoria – Attorney-General, Minister for Emergency Services) (12:06): I have gone on the record with dates for you previously. I am not going to do it again, because I do not know the answer to it. I do not want to restrict it, but I can confirm it is under active consideration at the moment.