Wednesday, 21 September 2022
Constituency questions
Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Commencement
-
Announcements
-
Acknowledgement of country
-
-
Petitions
-
Electoral reform
-
Lyndoch Living
-
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Inquiry into the Multi Purpose Taxi Program
-
Inquiry into the Commercial Passenger Vehicle Industry Act 2017 Reforms
-
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
- Notices
-
Adjournment
-
Members statements
-
Felicitations
-
Health system
-
STEM education
-
Felicitations
-
Felicitations
-
Maroondah Hospital
-
Austin Hospital
-
Felicitations
-
Hawthorn Football Club
-
Government achievements
-
Felicitations
-
Felicitations
-
Farming innovation
-
Felicitations
-
Taylan Mindemir
-
Felicitations
-
Felicitations
-
Felicitations
-
Uncle Jack Charles
-
Bushfire preparedness
-
-
Motions
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Victoria Police forensic services
-
COVID-19
-
Ministers statements: LGBTIQ+ equality
-
COVID-19
-
Ministers statements: government achievements
-
Northern Victoria Region family violence services
-
Ministers statements: Victorian Training Awards
-
Sow stalls
-
COVID-19
-
Ministers statements: veterans services
-
Written responses
-
-
Questions on notice
-
Answers
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
South Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
-
Motions
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Motions
-
Child sexual abuse
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Energy Legislation Amendment (Transition from Coal) Bill 2022
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Statements on reports, papers and petitions
-
Parole eligibility
-
Petition
-
-
Victorian Public Sector Commission
-
Report 2020–21
-
-
Corio Bay gas import terminal
-
Petition
-
-
Lyndoch Living
-
Petition
-
-
Mooroopna secondary education
-
Petition
-
-
Corio Bay gas import terminal
-
Petition
-
-
Train noise pollution
-
Petition
-
-
Parole eligibility
-
Petition
-
-
-
Motions
-
Clerk of the Legislative Council
-
-
Members
-
Ms Burnett-Wake
-
Valedictory statement
-
-
Mr Atkinson
-
Valedictory statement
-
-
Mr Rich-Phillips
-
Valedictory statement
-
-
Mr Gepp
-
Valedictory statement
-
-
Mr Elasmar
-
Valedictory statement
-
-
-
Bills
-
Disability Amendment Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
Racing Amendment (Unauthorised Access) Bill 2022
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
-
Adjournment
-
Transport infrastructure
-
Assistance dogs
-
Glenelg Shire Council rates
-
Western suburbs
-
Safer Care Victoria
-
Timber industry
-
Ministerial conduct
-
Men’s behaviour change programs
-
Child protection
-
Western Metropolitan Region transport infrastructure
-
Morwell River diversion
-
Responses
-
Eastern Metropolitan Region
Dr BACH (Eastern Metropolitan) (12:51): (1989) My constituency question is for the Minister for Transport Infrastructure. My question is: Minister, on what basis do you reject today’s findings from the Auditor-General regarding the so-called Suburban Rail Loop? The minister has responded to this stunning report by saying she ‘respectfully disagrees’ with that assessment. That assessment from the independent Auditor-General’s office is that the Suburban Rail Loop simply does not stack up. In fact the assessment from the Auditor-General is even worse than the previous assessment by the independent, apolitical Parliamentary Budget Office. The assessment today is that the benefit-cost ratio for this project is 0.5—0.5! I remember when the Labor Party railed against projects with a BCR of 1.4. We are going to be wasting 50 cents on the dollar. The minister previously has said she respectfully disagrees with the PBO, Infrastructure Australia, Infrastructure Victoria, the Grattan Institute and the Rail Futures Institute, just to name a few. Now she is at odds also with the independent Auditor-General’s office. On what basis does she disagree this time with another catastrophic independent assessment of this dog of a project?