Tuesday, 3 October 2023
Constituency questions
Western Victoria Region
-
Table of contents
-
Bills
-
Justice Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
- Georgie CROZIER
- Samantha RATNAM
- Ryan BATCHELOR
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- David LIMBRICK
- John BERGER
- Gaelle BROAD
- Jacinta ERMACORA
- Matthew BACH
- Tom McINTOSH
- Ann-Marie HERMANS
- Michael GALEA
- David ETTERSHANK
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Committee
- David LIMBRICK
- Jaclyn SYMES
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- David LIMBRICK
- Moira DEEMING
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Division
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Division
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
-
-
Bills
-
Justice Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
- Georgie CROZIER
- Samantha RATNAM
- Ryan BATCHELOR
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- David LIMBRICK
- John BERGER
- Gaelle BROAD
- Jacinta ERMACORA
- Matthew BACH
- Tom McINTOSH
- Ann-Marie HERMANS
- Michael GALEA
- David ETTERSHANK
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Committee
- David LIMBRICK
- Jaclyn SYMES
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- David LIMBRICK
- Moira DEEMING
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Division
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Division
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Western Victoria Region
Sarah MANSFIELD (Western Victoria) (12:52): (411) My question is for the Treasurer. Several Western Victorian GPs contacted me about the recent State Revenue Office ruling that payroll tax applies to most GP clinics retrospectively and prospectively. They are concerned they will have to increase patient fees, and one is considering their clinic’s ongoing viability. It has been a longstanding interpretation of Australian payroll tax laws that these do not apply to the usual work practices of most GPs. Other states and territories have introduced concessions to avoid retrospective application and delay enforcement. WA and Queensland have entirely exempted general practices from payroll tax. Although people are already struggling to access affordable GP care, Victoria is the only state doing nothing. Can the Treasurer guarantee that the patients in Western Victoria will not have to travel further or pay more to see a GP as a result of the payroll tax ruling?