Tuesday, 3 October 2023
Members statements
Voice to Parliament
-
Table of contents
-
Bills
-
Justice Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
- Georgie CROZIER
- Samantha RATNAM
- Ryan BATCHELOR
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- David LIMBRICK
- John BERGER
- Gaelle BROAD
- Jacinta ERMACORA
- Matthew BACH
- Tom McINTOSH
- Ann-Marie HERMANS
- Michael GALEA
- David ETTERSHANK
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Committee
- David LIMBRICK
- Jaclyn SYMES
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- David LIMBRICK
- Moira DEEMING
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Division
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Division
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
-
-
Bills
-
Justice Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
- Georgie CROZIER
- Samantha RATNAM
- Ryan BATCHELOR
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- David LIMBRICK
- John BERGER
- Gaelle BROAD
- Jacinta ERMACORA
- Matthew BACH
- Tom McINTOSH
- Ann-Marie HERMANS
- Michael GALEA
- David ETTERSHANK
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Committee
- David LIMBRICK
- Jaclyn SYMES
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- David LIMBRICK
- Moira DEEMING
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Samantha RATNAM
- Division
- David LIMBRICK
- Samantha RATNAM
- Jeff BOURMAN
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Division
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Voice to Parliament
David DAVIS (Southern Metropolitan) (13:48): I rise to warn the community about the Voice. The Voice is wrong in principle, it is divisive and it will entrench in the constitution a very negative outcome for Victoria in particular. It will favour elite groups over the productive outcomes that we all desire for Indigenous communities. As I say, this will be very bad for Victoria. The Voice will intervene in every area of federal–state overlap to Victoria’s detriment. Whether it is the grants commission, whether it is the Commonwealth health arrangements with the states, the Commonwealth–state arrangements on education, the Commonwealth–state arrangements on housing, whatever area of government you wish to look at, there will be an intervention by the Voice. The Voice in the circumstances will be particularly powerful given the risk of an activist and adventurous High Court which will in effect lock in key powers for the Voice. It will lock in funding. It will lock in arrangements for the Voice –
A member interjected.
David DAVIS: Oh, yes, it will, and the Voice will be in a position where it is untouchable because the High Court will lock it in given the activist mode of the High Court at the current point. Victoria will be the loser. Victorians always pay more. We always pay a disproportionate share of the taxes and we get less, and the Voice will amplify this to the detriment of Victorians.