Wednesday, 15 October 2025
Adjournment
Family violence
-
Commencement
-
Petitions
-
Lang Lang extractive industries
-
Rossdale Golf Club
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Members statements
-
Diwali
-
Prisoner safety
-
Kangaroo control
-
Maltese community
-
Fiji Day
-
Waste and recycling management
-
Rosebud Hospital
-
Parentline
-
Melbourne High School
-
Metro Tunnel
-
-
Production of documents
-
Construction industry
-
Motions
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Midsumma Festival
-
Triple Zero Victoria
-
Ministers statements: multicultural communities
-
Prisoner safety
-
Prisoner safety
-
Ministers statements: housing
-
Cannabis law reform
-
Economic policy
-
Ministers statements: multicultural story time
-
Cannabis law reform
-
Ministers statements: economy
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Motions
-
Animal shelters
-
-
Bills
-
Australian Grands Prix Amendment Bill 2025
-
Council’s amendments
-
-
-
Motions
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria
-
Report 2024–25
-
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Inquiry into Ambulance Victoria
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2025–26
-
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Inquiry into Ambulance Victoria
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Financial report 2024–25
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2025–26
-
-
Fire Rescue Victoria
-
Report 2023–24
-
-
-
Petitions
-
Adjournment
-
Power saving bonus
-
Flood recovery
-
Monash Sustainable Development Institute
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region dog parks
-
Metro Tunnel
-
Family violence
-
Frankston Hospital
-
Energy policy
-
Midland Highway
-
Metro Tunnel
-
Nursing students
-
Landcare
-
Emergency Services and Volunteers Fund
-
Box Hill brickworks site
-
Commercial passenger vehicle industry
-
Fire Rescue Victoria
-
Bushfire preparedness
-
Responses
-
Family violence
Rachel PAYNE (South-Eastern Metropolitan) (18:39): (1999) My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Prevention of Family Violence, and the action I seek is for the minister to extend the Safe at Home initiative to the City of Casey. The Victorian government’s Safe at Home initiative is a three-year trial in Geelong to allow victim-survivors of family violence to stay safely in their home and community while perpetrators are removed and given support to change their behaviour. This initiative will also provide a rapid response to families, with wraparound specialist support in housing, employment and child and cultural support. All too often it is the victims of family violence and their children that are forced to leave their home to escape perpetrators. The current system increases the risk of homelessness and social isolation, with victim-survivors forced to change jobs, take children out of schools and leave communities.
We know that family violence is the single largest driver of homelessness for women in Victoria. At a time when housing affordability is at crisis levels, the Safe at Home initiative is critical. I know many would like to see a similar initiative trialled in my region of the south-east. In this year alone almost 7000 family violence incidents have been recorded in the City of Casey. Shamefully, this represents the highest number of reports of any Victorian local government area. While we wait for a three-year trial of the Safe at Home initiative to be completed and to know if it will become permanent or expanded, areas like Casey continue to suffer through a family violence epidemic. Funding an expansion of this initiative to areas of highest need is common sense and recognises that, with an issue like family violence, time is so critical. While I commend the government on trialling innovative and wraparound early intervention support for victim-survivors of family violence, we want to see initiatives like this futureproofed. We need an assurance that these initiatives will be properly funded and quickly scalable to areas of highest demonstrated need as soon as they are successfully proven. So I ask: will the minister extend the Safe at Home initiative to the City of Casey?