Wednesday, 17 May 2023
Adjournment
Preston Market
-
Commencement
-
Petitions
-
Police conduct
-
-
Bills
-
Corrections Amendment (Parole) Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
Public transport fares
-
Real Deal project
-
IDAHOBIT
-
Wear Orange Wednesday
-
IDAHOBIT
-
Rainbow Community Angels
-
National Volunteer Week
-
Veterinary care
-
IDAHOBIT
-
Williamstown dockyard
-
Willum Warrain
-
Gender equality
-
-
Bills
-
Children, Youth and Families Amendment (Home Stretch) Bill 2023
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Committees
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Housing affordability
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
Ministers statements: IDAHOBIT
-
Public transport funding
-
Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
-
Ministers statements: National Volunteer Week
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Nazi symbol prohibition
-
Ministers statements: men’s sheds
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Ministers statements: National Volunteer Week
-
Written responses
-
-
Questions on notice
-
Answers
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Committees
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
-
Business of the house
-
Orders of the day
-
-
Motions
-
RSL sub-branch poker machine entitlements
-
-
Business of the house
-
Orders of the day
-
-
Motions
-
Victorian Parliamentary Former Members Association
-
Cost of living
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Department of Health
-
Annual Report on Drinking Water Quality in Victoria 2021–22
-
-
Remembrance Parks Central Victoria
-
Report 2021–22
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2022–23
-
-
V/Line
-
Report 2021–22
-
-
Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission
-
Operation Daintree: Special Report
-
-
-
Adjournment
-
Early childhood education
-
WorkCover
-
Equal Opportunity Act 2010
-
Water safety education
-
Traralgon Men’s Shed
-
LGBTIQ+ community safety
-
Southern Metropolitan Region level crossing removals
-
Mildura Base Public Hospital
-
Anti-vilification legislation
-
Child protection
-
Preston Market
-
SBS headquarters
-
COVID-19 vaccination
-
Road safety
-
Mickleham–Somerton roads, Greenvale
-
Responses
-
Preston Market
Samantha RATNAM (Northern Metropolitan) (17:59): (225) My adjournment matter tonight is for the Minister for Planning, and the action I seek is that she formally responds to the Darebin community’s request for Preston Market to be publicly acquired. Preston Market has been a much-loved local landmark since it was built in 1970. The people’s market, as it is known, is an important community hub that provides locals with access to fresh food and community connections. But the market has been under threat from its current owners, property developers Salta Properties, who are seeking to demolish most of the market and replace it with apartments.
Last month the Victorian Planning Authority Projects Standing Advisory Committee released its report on the future of the Preston Market precinct. It recommended that more be done to recognise and protect the character of the market, including its heritage status, and that a much more substantial proportion of the market be retained. In response, the government announced that a heritage overlay would be applied to the market to retain a significant portion of the existing market and protect its heritage value. Understandably, the Darebin community, who have been fighting to save the market for years, view the standing advisory committee recommendations with some scepticism. They and I still hold serious concerns about the shape of the development and what it will mean for the market’s future. The standing advisory committee missed an opportunity to push for much more public and affordable housing and nation-leading environmental sustainability at this site, instead agreeing that that up to – not a minimum of but up to – 10 per cent of affordable housing on the site was sufficient. In a housing crisis, when we desperately need more public and affordable housing in central locations close to public services, not pushing for more mandatory affordable housing at the Preston Market precinct is incredibly short-sighted. While the government has indicated that a significant proportion of the market will be retained, it is unclear as to what this will actually mean. Given that so far the government has been more interested in progressing the redevelopment, the community has understandably lost confidence that the planning framework will deliver fair outcomes.
The stall operators and the community stand to be the biggest losers in all of this. Salta has demonstrated little regard for the welfare of stallholders and the interests of the community. Even after the standing advisory committee report was tabled and the government indicated their support for protection of more of the market, fliers were being handed out that seemed to threaten stallholders with an early shutdown of the market. This has been intimidating and stressful for stallholders and the community.
While we now have the standing advisory committee report, they are just recommendations. The ultimate decision about the market’s redevelopment remains with the government. The community has put forward an alternative to private development: that it is brought into public hands through a compulsory public acquisition. They argue the markets are an important public space and public service and that other local markets like the Queen Victoria Market are publicly owned and managed. We need community spaces like Preston Market now more than ever. We cannot let short-sighted planning turn the market into a developers paradise that makes them squillions of dollars and leaves the community socially and economically poorer. The community is seeking a response from the government to their alternative plan. I ask the minister to formally respond to the Darebin community’s request for public acquisition of the Preston Market.