Wednesday, 15 May 2024
Constituency questions
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Commencement
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Rulings from the Chair
-
Political material
-
-
Business of the house
-
Adjournment
-
-
Motions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Members statements
-
Fitzroy Primary School
-
Fitzroy Legal Service
-
Ancient Church of the East, St Mary’s Church
-
St Mary Coptic Orthodox College
-
Holy Spirit of the Syriac Catholic Church
-
Great forest national park
-
Camberwell
-
National Volunteer Week
-
IDAHOBIT
-
Portland–Maroona rail line
-
National Volunteer Week
-
Motor neurone disease
-
Suicide prevention
-
Cannabis law reform
-
Holocaust Remembrance Day
-
Beaufort Probus Club
-
Raj and Preeti Khillan
-
Upinder Singh
-
Violence against women
-
Blackburn station craft market
-
Member for Pakenham
-
Eurovision Song Contest
-
-
Production of documents
-
Infrastructure contributions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Bills
-
Hemp Industry Bill 2024
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
LGBTIQA+ community
-
Integrity agencies funding
-
Ministers statements: IDAHOBIT
-
Middle East conflict
-
Foster carers
-
Ministers statements: budget 2024–25
-
Gender identity
-
Ministers statements: multicultural communities
-
Corrections system
-
Youth justice system
-
Ministers statements: budget 2024–25
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
-
Bills
-
Hemp Industry Bill 2024
-
Second reading
-
-
Residential Tenancies Amendment (Rent Freeze and Caps) Bill 2023
-
-
Motions
-
Budget 2024–25
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Family violence reform implementation monitor
-
Legislative Review of Family Violence Information Sharing and Risk Management
-
-
Gender identity
-
Petition
-
-
Gender identity
-
Petition
-
-
Swinburne University of Technology
-
Report 2023
-
-
Department of the Legislative Council
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
Gender identity
-
Petition
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
Albury Wodonga Health
-
Production of documents
-
-
-
Petitions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Rulings from the Chair
-
Broadcast of proceedings
-
-
Bills
-
National Energy Retail Law (Victoria) Bill 2024
-
Council’s amendments
-
-
State Taxation Amendment Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Financial Management Amendment (Gender Responsive Budgeting) Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Motions
-
Community safety
-
-
Adjournment
-
Family violence
-
Transport infrastructure projects
-
COVID-19 vaccination
-
Housing
-
Reproductive health leave
-
Mernda–Wollert rail line
-
Victorian systemic review of family violence deaths
-
Point Cook Football Club
-
Windfall gains tax
-
Upfield line level crossing removals
-
Road maintenance
-
Fosterville Gold Mine
-
Responses
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
Richard WELCH (North-Eastern Metropolitan) (12:57): (866) My question is to the Treasurer in the other place. Last night the Prime Minister and his Treasurer had to allocate $3.25 billion to the North East Link, bailing out yet another delinquent state project, but this bailout also reveals a total lack of confidence in the $216 billion Suburban Rail Loop by the federal Labor Party. Last night confirmed the absence of federal support for the Suburban Rail Loop East in my electorate, despite the Victorian government’s request for an additional $10 billion. The SRL faces a substantial funding shortfall now, exceeding $20 billion for just this first stage. Given these developments, can the Treasurer assure my constituents that the shortfall will not be met by any expansion of the already massive value capture component of the funding model – that is, that the shortfall will not be met by an expansion of the precinct in size, in height and in intended population beyond the 70,000 already proposed?