Thursday, 28 November 2024
Adjournment
Gender services
-
Commencement
-
Announcements
-
Felicitations
-
-
Committees
-
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Bills
-
Corrections Amendment (Assisted Reproductive Treatment) Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
-
Papers
-
County Court of Victoria
-
Report 2023–24
-
-
Magistrates’ Court of Victoria
-
Report 2023–24
-
-
Supreme Court of Victoria
-
Report 2023–24
-
-
Victorian Infrastructure Delivery Authority
-
Tunnel and Stations Public Private Partnership: Project Summary Addendum 2
-
-
Department of Families, Fairness and Housing
-
Inclusive Victoria: State Disability Plan
-
-
Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
-
Sustainability Fund Activities Report
-
-
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Inquiry into Local Government Funding and Services
-
-
-
Papers
-
Petitions
-
Recognition and settlement agreements
-
-
Production of documents
-
Business of the house
-
Notices
-
Adjournment
-
-
Motions
-
Middle East conflict
-
Government performance
-
Prahran by-election
-
-
Members statements
-
Northern Community Legal Centre
-
Council elections
-
Denis Moroney
-
Felicitations
-
Western Victoria Region sporting facilities
-
Regional Victoria
-
Transgender Day of Remembrance
-
Water safety
-
Personalised Support Services
-
Melbourne Kannada Sangha
-
Armenian National Committee of Australia
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region racing
-
Social media age limits
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
Treaty
-
Council elections
-
Syro-Malabar Eparchy of St Thomas the Apostle
-
Lebanese Kataeb
-
Felicitations
-
Police conduct
-
Ringwood East Traders Association
-
Government performance
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
State Taxation Further Amendment Bill 2024
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Triple Zero Victoria
-
VCE exams
-
Ministers statements: racial discrimination
-
Vocational education and training
-
Parental incarceration
-
Ministers statements: regional housing
-
Residential planning zones
-
Skills plan
-
Ministers statements: emergency services
-
TAFE teachers
-
Fire medical response program
-
Ministers statements: LGBTIQA+ community
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Bills
-
State Taxation Further Amendment Bill 2024
-
Committee
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Bev McARTHUR
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Bev McARTHUR
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Bev McARTHUR
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Bev McARTHUR
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Sarah MANSFIELD
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Sarah MANSFIELD
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Sarah MANSFIELD
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Georgie CROZIER
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Evan MULHOLLAND
- Jaclyn SYMES
- Division
- Jaclyn SYMES
-
Third reading
-
Justice Legislation Amendment (Committals) Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Inquiries Amendment (Yoorrook Justice Commission Records and Other Matters) Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Amendment (Paramedic Practitioners) Bill 2024
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Motions
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
Adjournment
-
Gas policy
-
Metro Tunnel
-
Police conduct
-
Gender services
-
Family violence services
-
West Gate Tunnel
-
Eltham copper butterfly statue
-
Stalking law reform
-
Wastewater management
-
COVID-19 vaccination
-
Authority-to-control-wildlife permits
-
Greater South East Melbourne
-
Probus clubs
-
Parks Victoria
-
Wangaratta High School
-
Donnybrook Road, Kalkallo
-
Suburban Rail Loop
-
Responses
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
Gender services
Bev McARTHUR (Western Victoria) (18:11): (1337) My adjournment matter for the Minister for Children concerns extraordinary failings of the Department of Families, Fairness and Housing (DFFH) revealed in a recent shocking decision by the Victorian Children’s Court. I recognise the sensitivity of this matter. I raise it with the permission of the father but will not reference identifying details. I seek only to highlight the incredible findings of the magistrate. They must be heard loud and clear by clinicians and social workers. This is a terrifying story. No-one involved, save the children, comes out unblemished, and we should recognise that dealing with troubled families is incredibly stressful and difficult. But this decision reveals some incredibly troubling findings. It is Kafkaesque.
A father acting as a single parent, as the mother was abroad, had care of two children who had recently immigrated and were naturally lonely and finding life hard. He sought care for his elder daughter and indeed paid for it himself. Unfortunately, he came up against medical and child protection elements who believed their own unproven views and prejudices should trump his rights as a father. He supported his daughter’s referral to the Royal Children’s Hospital for treatment for autism and ADHD. He was not told the child had been referred to the gender clinic, despite guidance saying parents must know and be present. It is clear he was deliberately deceived. His understandably furious response was used as justification for the removal of his children from his care and his committal for psychiatric assessment, which ultimately found his response to be an unsurprising result of his treatment by the authorities, not caused by mental illness. It appears his biggest crime was to disagree with those who think dysphoria treatment is the only solution. They saw his resistance as harmful to his child; he saw it as fighting for their future and understandably was driven to react. This father is an informed and reasonable man. He even said that if the treatment for gender dysphoria were to work, he would support it for his daughter, but there is no evidence it does.
An extraordinary 12-month legal battle has now vindicated him and criticised the behaviour of the DFFH staff and certain Royal Children’s Hospital clinicians. It is a terrifying window on what can happen to those who oppose fanatical ideological activists masquerading as health professionals and social workers. Minister, the action I seek is that you order an immediate review of your department’s actions in this case and follow up with how many other cases like this there are.