Wednesday, 31 July 2024
Adjournment
State forest access
-
Commencement
-
Petitions
-
Winchelsea Primary School
-
-
Papers
-
Petitions
-
Wonthaggi planning
-
-
Business of the house
-
Motions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Members statements
-
Julie Suares
-
Government performance
-
Waste and recycling management
-
Knox United Soccer Club
-
Stefan Romaniw
-
Cannabis law reform
-
Allan Trinca
-
Camberwell Primary School
-
Chatham Primary School
-
Treaty
-
Portland Bay School
-
Southern Metropolitan Region housing
-
-
Bills
-
Government Construction Projects Integrity Bill 2024
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Production of documents
-
Timber industry
-
-
Bills
-
Confiscation Amendment (Unexplained Wealth) Bill 2024
-
Council’s amendments
-
-
-
Motions
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Western Metropolitan Region fire services
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
Ministers statements: Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability
-
LGBTIQA+ health services
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
Ministers statements: LGBTIQ+ community
-
Energy policy
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
Ministers statements: Shepparton Albanian Moslem Society
-
Anti-vilification legislation
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
-
Ministers statements: Victoria Legal Aid
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
-
Motions
-
Medicinal cannabis
-
-
Committees
-
Environment and Planning Committee
-
Select committee
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Department of the Legislative Council
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
Department of Justice and Community Safety
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
Electoral Matters Committee
-
Inquiry into the Conduct of the 2022 Victorian State Election
-
-
Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability Victoria
-
Strategic Audit 2022–23: Implementation of Environmental Management Systems by Agencies and Public Authorities
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
State Electricity Commission
-
Constitution of SEC Victoria Pty Ltd
-
-
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office
-
Access to Emergency Healthcare
-
-
-
Petitions
-
Adjournment
-
Cladding rectification program
-
Cost of living
-
Housing
-
Housing affordability
-
Wild dog control
-
Firewood collection
-
Wonthaggi planning
-
Container deposit scheme
-
Cost of living
-
Southside Justice
-
Wind farm regulations
-
State forest access
-
Windsor Community Children’s Centre
-
Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance
-
Responses
-
State forest access
Melina BATH (Eastern Victoria) (18:38): (1018) My adjournment matter this evening is for the Minister for Environment. This is a tale of two concurrent investigations, both of which are causing considerable distress to thousands of my constituents in the Eastern Victoria Region and indeed across the state. One is the eminent panel – these are your words, Minister, not mine – for the Central Highlands state forest, which is about to deliver its final report and recommendations through VEAC, the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council, to you, Minister. The other is the Great Outdoors Taskforce’s future of our state forests taskforce – again, your terminology, not mine – that you announced on 1 April this year. I quote you:
Victorians have a landmark opportunity to help design the future of the state’s public land estate – which now includes more than 1.8 million hectares of forest previously used for timber harvesting.
The Great Outdoors Taskforce is supposed to be assessing all state forests, including that of the Central Highlands, so you are double dipping in these two different organisations. There is cross-membership in these, of some but not all. Karen Cain and VEAC’s Mellissa Wood are in both, and both have a history of advocating for the locking up of more Crown land into parks and reserves. Mr Dear and Mr Robinson I know are very good people from Gippsland, and I am sure they are seeking a balanced analysis, where the former clearly have a bias.
There are 17,000 Victorians who have already signed the petition that I am sponsoring on behalf of bush users, and they want to send a clear message to you and your bureaucrats: no more new national parks. The petition and movement are in response to massive community concern at Labor’s woeful management of the public land estate as it is, noting that the reclassification of state forests to national parks will not ensure greater health for the environment or the preservation of biodiversity. It will only seek to exclude traditional pursuits that provide wellbeing to thousands and thousands of Victorians. Public exclusion of traditional pursuits does not equate to better conservation; better land management and active management of our forest estates, whatever the land tenure, is far more important. This government has 60 per cent of the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action workforce sitting in metropolitan Melbourne. We need more boots and less suits in our environment. Bush users such as hunters, four-wheel drivers, horseriders, trail bike riders, prospectors and fossickers, anglers and those Victorians who like to camp in state forests with their family and their pet will face exclusion. You are saying in the Guardian that the Nationals are running a scare campaign. The action I seek, Minister, is for you to rule out the curtailment of traditional bush-user activities right across this investigation and allow people public access to public land.