Wednesday, 19 June 2024
Petitions
Lord’s Prayer
-
Commencement
-
Petitions
-
Housing
-
Lord’s Prayer
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Motions
-
Middle East conflict
-
-
Members statements
-
Cecilia Donnelly
-
Grant and David
-
Western Victoria Region Premier’s visit
-
King’s Birthday
-
Nunawading Basketball
-
Police conduct
-
Soldiers–Thompsons roads, Clyde North
-
Climate change
-
Casey Basketball Association
-
-
Production of documents
-
Country Fire Authority
-
-
Members
-
Minister for Skills and TAFE
-
Absence
-
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Emergency services
-
Ministers statements: child protection
-
Duck hunting
-
North East Water
-
Ministers statements: mental health services
-
Change or Suppression (Conversion) Practices Prohibition Act 2021
-
Child protection
-
Ministers statements: housing
-
Drug Courts
-
Malmsbury Youth Justice Centre
-
Ministers statements: Country Fire Authority funding
-
Written responses
-
Constituency questions
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
-
Bills
-
Local Government Amendment (Governance and Integrity) Bill 2024
-
Council’s amendments
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Committees
-
Select committee
-
-
Motions
-
Ombudsman referral
-
Energy policy
-
-
Statements on tabled papers and petitions
-
Victoria State Emergency Service
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
Pyrenees Highway
-
Petition
-
-
Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
-
Victorian Renewable Energy Target 2022–23 Progress Report
-
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2024–25
-
-
-
Petitions
-
Cannabis law reform
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Adjournment
-
Family violence
-
Abortion services
-
Literacy education
-
Land tax
-
COVID-19 vaccination
-
Middle East conflict
-
LGBTIQA+ youth support
-
Housing
-
Edgars Road shops, Thomastown
-
Central Highlands mineral resources
-
Suburban Rail Loop
-
Community safety
-
Victorian artificial limb program
-
Responses
-
Lord’s Prayer
Evan MULHOLLAND (Northern Metropolitan) presented a petition bearing 10,912 signatures:
The petition of certain citizens of the State of Victoria draws to the attention of the Legislative Council that they should oppose any move to abolish the reading of the Lord’s Prayer at the commencement of the proceedings of the Victorian Parliament’s Legislative Council (Upper House). We acknowledge the joint letter to members of Parliament from the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne, Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, Board of Imams Victoria, Hindu Council of Australia, Victoria and the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council who minister and care for more than two million Victorians in our communities. The Lord’s Prayer is a strong reminder that Parliament is not the ultimate authority for building a just and caring society and, since 1857, the Lord’s Prayer has been a longstanding part of the formal processes of both Houses of the Victorian Parliament. The recitation of prayer is a common tradition of the Westminster system, and together with the Acknowledgement of Country, provides a vital link to two important facets of Victorian Parliament’s heritage. The Lord’s Prayer is an action of public acknowledgement of responsible service to the people of Victoria. Multi-faith communities perform a vital role in Victoria’s multicultural society. Any move to secularise parliamentary proceedings would send a clear message from the Parliament that faith has no place in Victoria. The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Council recognise the valuable role of the Lord’s Prayer in Parliament and ensure its practice continues to play an integral part of our democratic tradition.
Evan MULHOLLAND: As this petition qualifies for debate under standing order 11.03(10), I give notice that I intend to move ‘That the petition be taken into consideration’ on Wednesday of next sitting week.