Tuesday, 28 November 2023
Adjournment
Housing
-
Commencement
-
Bills
- Early Childhood Legislation Amendment (Premises Approval in Principle) Bill 2023
- Transport Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
-
Environment Legislation Amendment (Circular Economy and Other Matters) Bill 2023
-
Royal assent
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Immigration detention
-
Ministers statements: Changing Places
-
State Emergency Service funding
-
Medicinal cannabis
-
Ministers statements: community legal centres
-
Country Fire Authority resources
-
Justice portfolio consultancy expenditure
-
Ministers statements: Tiny Towns Fund
-
Game Management Authority board
-
Event accessibility
-
Ministers statements: prison visitor schemes
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Petitions
-
Mount Eliza Secondary College
-
Wild horse control
-
-
Papers
-
Consumer Policy Research Centre
-
Report 2022–23
-
-
-
Committees
-
Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
-
Alert Digest No. 15
-
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Inquiry into the Rental and Housing Affordability Crisis in Victoria
-
-
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee
-
Gambling and Liquor Regulation in Victoria: A Follow up of Three Auditor-General Reports
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Invitation from Legislative Assembly
-
Standing and sessional orders
-
-
Papers
-
Petitions
-
Nepean Highway, Frankston, planning
-
-
Business of the house
- Notices
-
General business
-
Committees
-
Parliamentary committees
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
Gender equality
-
Water policy
-
Northern Victoria Region AFL draft picks
-
Furphy family
-
Public service workforce
-
16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence
-
Health system
-
School Strike 4 Climate
-
Melbourne Holocaust Museum
-
Renewable energy
-
Student political engagement
-
William Taylor
-
Animal welfare
-
Natasha Taleski
-
Felicitations
-
Beaufort Agricultural Society annual show
-
Ballarat citizenship ceremony
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Corrections Amendment (Parole Reform) Bill 2023
-
Crimes Amendment (Non-fatal Strangulation) Bill 2023
-
-
Adjournment
-
Age of criminal responsibility
-
Renewable energy
-
Northern Victoria Region health services
-
Nursing students
-
Herne Swamp
-
Shepparton bypass
-
Wombat mange
-
Energy policy
-
Cost of living
-
Bushfire preparedness
-
Oil and gas exploration
-
Newport level crossing removals
-
Berwick Church of Christ
-
Wild dog control
-
Housing
-
Responses
-
Housing
Evan MULHOLLAND (Northern Metropolitan) (18:41): (631) My adjournment tonight is directed towards the Minister for Planning, and it is in relation to the Cancer Council building on the corner of Victoria and Rathdowne streets in Carlton, up the road. The building is a blight on our city and has been dilapidated for over 10 years and vacant. The owner of the site has spent close to $2 million trying to get permits to demolish it and replace it with an apartment complex that could house 67 families and would be close to services, public transport and the CBD – exactly the kind of housing we want. Yet the City of Melbourne and VCAT have repeatedly rejected the application, citing heritage and urban design concerns. The site is within the World Heritage environment area of the Royal Exhibition Building in Carlton Gardens, which limits the height and scale of new buildings. The building that was going to be put there was eight storeys. But in 1888 a six-storey building stood at the corner. A replication of this Victorian-era building, if put forward today, would likely be rejected by VCAT and Melbourne City Council for impinging on this World Heritage environment area.
We have got an absurd situation that benefits no-one. The site remains a blight on our streetscapes and attracts squatters, drugs and crime. The owner is frustrated and unable to proceed with this development. Locals are absolutely fed up in my electorate with the lack of action and antisocial behaviour, and potential residents – potential constituents – are denied the opportunity to live very close to the CBD and public transport in a quality and affordable apartment.
This government has a target to build 800,000 homes over the next decade – 220 homes every day, including weekends and public holidays, for 10 years. Under this government the costs of rents have gone up and up – the cost of homes – but instead of a solution we see endless bickering. Indeed the Property Investment Professionals of Australia found that one in four property investors are leaving the market altogether because it is an uncertain investment. I seek the action of the minister to explain how Victorians can expect the government to deliver on its housing target if sensible and sustainable developments like this one, which Victorians need to address Labor’s housing and rental crisis, are prevented from going ahead. What action will the minister take to ensure that this unutilised property will be developed as soon as possible to benefit all Victorians?