Tuesday, 16 May 2023
Constituency questions
Western Victoria Region
-
Commencement
-
Bills
-
Statute Law Amendment Bill 2022
-
Royal assent
-
- Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Amendment (Medically Supervised Injecting Centre) Bill 2023
-
Human Source Management Bill 2023
-
Royal assent
-
-
-
Address to His Majesty the King
-
Coronation of His Majesty King Charles III
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Animal welfare
-
Ministers statements: National Volunteer Week
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Anti-vilification legislation
-
Ministers statements: National Volunteer Week
-
Maribyrnong River flood review
-
Medicinal cannabis
-
Ministers statements: early childhood education
-
Ballarat car parking
-
Firewood collection
-
Ministers statements: agriculture sector support
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
South-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
North-Eastern Metropolitan Region
-
-
Bills
-
Children, Youth and Families Amendment (Home Stretch) Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
Racial and Religious Tolerance Amendment (Anti-vilification) Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
-
Papers
-
Victorian Law Reform Commission
-
Inclusive Juries: Access for People Who Are Deaf, Hard of Hearing, Blind or Have Low Vision
-
-
-
Committees
-
Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
-
Alert Digest No. 4
-
-
-
Papers
-
Petitions
-
Whitehorse City Council
-
-
Business of the house
-
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office
-
Financial audit
-
- Notices
-
General business
-
-
Committees
-
Economy and Infrastructure Committee
-
Membership
-
-
-
Members statements
-
Ballarat citizenship ceremony
-
Extremism
-
MardiGrass
-
Our Lady of La Vang Shrine
-
Bangs Street, Prahran, redevelopment
-
Commonwealth Bank, Fawkner branch
-
Father Bob Maguire
-
Community legal services
-
Extremism
-
Federal budget
-
Mullivaikkal Remembrance Day
-
National Volunteer Week
-
Wild Deer Hunting Expo
-
National Volunteer Week
-
Donvale Christian College
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion and orders of the day
-
-
Bills
-
Disability and Social Services Regulation Amendment Bill 2023
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Written responses
-
-
Adjournment
-
Family violence legal services
-
State Emergency Service funding
-
Southern Metropolitan Region multicultural communities
-
Commonwealth Games
-
Shepparton infrastructure projects
-
Glen Huntly level crossing removals
-
Liquor licensing
-
Motorcyclist safety
-
Victorian patient transport assistance scheme
-
Melbourne Airport rail link
-
Commonwealth Games
-
Goldstream RV
-
Teachers
-
Eastern Victoria Region police numbers
-
Hurstbridge train line
-
Port Melbourne public housing
-
Responses
-
Western Victoria Region
Bev McARTHUR (Western Victoria) (13:48): (168) My question is for the Minister for Agriculture and concerns the direct and damaging impact of the federal budget on farmers in my electorate of Western Victoria Region. Minister, all of us accept that biosecurity is vital to primary producers, but what the announced levy does is make Australian farmers pay for their international competitors to bring their produce to Australia – and to make money while they are doing it. $153 million will be charged to domestic producers, not the people actually importing the threats. It is outrageous, and there is an alternative. The independent Craik biosecurity review proposed an importer container levy. My question to the minister is: what representations have you made to your Labor colleagues in Canberra to propose an alternative to this unfair new farmer tax?