Wednesday, 17 August 2022
Adjournment
Bakers Delight investigation
-
Commencement
-
Announcements
-
Acknowledgement of country
-
-
Petitions
-
Albert Street, Sebastopol
-
-
Papers
-
Business of the house
-
Members statements
-
Health system
-
Donwood Community Aged Care Services
-
Torquay RSL
-
Health system
-
South Melbourne Life Saving Club
-
Child sex offenders
-
Australian Sports Technologies Network
-
EduTECH conference
-
Moon Lee Tae Kwon Do
-
RSPCA Cupcake Day
-
Independent media
-
-
Bills
-
Land Amendment (Accessing Licensed Water Frontages) Bill 2022
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Energy Legislation Amendment (Transition from Coal) Bill 2022
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Amendment (Restoration of Powers) Bill 2022
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
Health Legislation Amendment (Conscientious Objection) Bill 2022
-
-
Motions
-
Integrity and Oversight Committee
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Care leavers redress scheme
-
Ministers statements: renewable energy
-
Ministers statements: sick pay guarantee
-
Victoria Police licensing and regulation division
-
Pest control
-
Ministers statements: climate change
-
Western Metropolitan Region social housing
-
Albert Street, Sebastopol
-
Ministers statements: early childhood workforce
-
Written responses
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Western Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
Southern Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Western Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Northern Metropolitan Region
-
Eastern Victoria Region
-
Northern Victoria Region
-
-
Bills
-
Multicultural Victoria Amendment (Independence) Bill 2022
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Planning and Environment Amendment (Wake Up to Climate Change) Bill 2022
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Statements on reports, papers and petitions
-
Department of Treasury and Finance
-
Budget papers 2022–23
-
-
Legal and Social Issues Committee
-
Inquiry into Homelessness in Victoria
-
-
Auditor-General
-
Kinship Care
-
-
Environment and Planning Committee
-
Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria
-
-
Albert Street, Sebastopol
-
Petition
-
-
Pandemic Declaration Accountability and Oversight Committee
-
Review of pandemic orders
-
-
-
Adjournment
-
Kyneton town hall
-
Wyndham active transport
-
Suburban Rail Loop
-
Wyndham public transport
-
Bakers Delight investigation
-
BlueHub and Police Veterans Victoria
-
Vida
-
Maternal and child health services funding
-
Roadside vegetation
-
Chronic pain
-
Responses
-
-
Joint sitting of Parliament
Bakers Delight investigation
Mrs McARTHUR (Western Victoria) (17:57): (2062) My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Industrial Relations. It relates to the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission’s three-year-long investigation into Bakers Delight and its sexual harassment policy. The commission was not responding to a complaint; no problem, no single incident or allegation was reported. In short, they went looking for a problem, and like any bureaucracy seeking to justify its existence, unsurprisingly they found one. What did Bakers Delight do to deserve this? It is not just the time, effort and stress inflicted upon a business by investigation, but the reputational damage which might result, all without any incident actually occurring. Yet even this does not seem to be enough for some. Emily Howie, general counsel for the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, recently tweeted that ‘we need to boost the regulatory powers given to commissions like ours’. This is terrifying for business, especially for small businesses which do not have the HR, PR and legal departments or budgets of big companies like Bakers Delight. It is yet another example of this government thinking only about big business and big unions.
Those who suffer are entrepreneurs, family businesses, people who believe they are doing the right thing, who would never dream of doing other than supporting their employees, but who face investigation from a government bureaucracy even with no indication of any sexual harassment occurring. I have spoken to small business owners concerned by this, and they want to know if the government understands the consequences of this overreach, so the action I seek is simple. I invite the minister to join me to meet employers who feel that this threat of extended regulation and reputational ruin could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.