Thursday, 4 June 2026
Rulings from the Chair
Constituency questions
-
Commencement
-
Business of the house
-
Documents
-
Motions
-
Motions by leave
- Tim RICHARDSON
- Gabrielle DE VIETRI
- Cindy McLEISH
- Anthony CIANFLONE
- Jade BENHAM
- Gary MAAS
- David SOUTHWICK
- Meng Heang TAK
- Brad ROWSWELL
- Steve McGHIE
- Nicole WERNER
- Jordan CRUGNALE
- Martin CAMERON
- Belinda WILSON
- Tim McCURDY
- Daniela DE MARTINO
- Annabelle CLEELAND
- Chris COUZENS
- Kim WELLS
- Dylan WIGHT
- Wayne FARNHAM
- John MULLAHY
- Rachel WESTAWAY
- Emma KEALY
- Nina TAYLOR
- David SOUTHWICK
- Pauline RICHARDS
- Sarah CONNOLLY
- Brad ROWSWELL
- Danny O’BRIEN
-
-
Members statements
-
Bills
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
Constituency questions
-
Rulings from the Chair
-
Bills
-
Business of the house
-
Rulings from the Chair
-
Bills
-
Motions
-
Working from home
- Dylan WIGHT
- Mathew HILAKARI
- Eden FOSTER
- Iwan WALTERS
- Vicki WARD
- Kathleen MATTHEWS-WARD
- Nathan LAMBERT
- John MULLAHY
- Josh BULL
- Pauline RICHARDS
- Gary MAAS
- Meng Heang TAK
- Daniela DE MARTINO
- Paul MERCURIO
- Paul EDBROOKE
- John LISTER
- Kat THEOPHANOUS
- Alison MARCHANT
- Jordan CRUGNALE
- Belinda WILSON
- Martha HAYLETT
-
Proof only
Please do not quote
Rulings from the Chair
Constituency questions
The SPEAKER (14:44): Yesterday during constituency questions the member for Glen Waverley asked the minister what would happen if the opposition were elected and implemented their policies. Previous rulings have allowed questions seeking responses from ministers about their plans or preparations to respond to events, plans or circumstances that have not yet occurred or been implemented. This of course is in order because it is reasonable for members to anticipate that ministers have prepared for future possibilities and scenarios, and therefore reasonable for members to ask ministers about those plans. However, even in reference to a possible event that has not happened yet, the question must relate to matters a minister controls or could be anticipated to control within their portfolio. The member’s question explicitly asks the minister what will happen if the minister is no longer a minister. The minister can only respond in supposition, and therefore the question is hypothetical and I rule the question out of order.