Tuesday, 7 March 2023
Constituency questions
Gippsland South electorate
-
Commencement
-
Bills
-
Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Amendment (Medically Supervised Injecting Centre) Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
-
Local Government (Moira Shire Council) Bill 2023
-
Introduction and first reading
-
Statement of compatibility
-
Second reading
-
-
-
Business of the house
-
Committees
-
Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
-
Alert Digest No. 1
-
-
-
Documents
-
Parliamentary Budget Office
- Report of Operations for the Victorian 2022 General Election
-
Annual Report 2021–22
- Documents
-
-
Bills
-
Racing Amendment (Unauthorised Access) Bill 2022
-
Council’s agreement
-
- Building and Planning Legislation Amendment Bill 2022
-
Racing Amendment (Unauthorised Access) Bill 2022
-
Royal assent
-
-
-
Motions
-
Parliamentary integrity
-
-
Business of the house
-
Members statements
-
Patricia Brown-Cheung
-
Malvern electorate crime
-
Malvern Valley Primary School
-
Amy Duncan
-
Water policy
-
Dederang Picnic Races
-
Wangaratta Turf Club
-
Ovens Valley electorate schools
-
Charlie Desira and Bozena Iwanowski
-
Brighton Cricket Club
-
St Leonard’s Uniting Church, Brighton
-
3186BeachPatrol
-
Ashburton Community Festival
-
Boroondara citizenship ceremony
-
Pipe reserve trail pedestrian crossing, Glen Waverley
-
Gippsland United basketball
-
Live music venues
-
Rowville electorate schools funding
-
FunFlight
-
Brunswick electorate public transport
-
Footscray electorate development
-
Education funding
-
Victorian Bangladeshi Community Foundation
-
South Sudanese-Australian Academic Society
-
Wyndham citizenship ceremony
-
Second Chance Animal Rescue
-
Bethal Primary School
-
Victorian Mosque Open Day
-
Australian Vietnamese Women’s Association
-
Lift the Lid
-
Surrey Hills Primary School
-
Amy Duncan
-
Botanic Ridge Primary School
-
-
Business of the house
-
Notices of motion
-
-
Bills
-
Local Government (Moira Shire Council) Bill 2023
-
Second reading
- Third reading
-
-
-
Questions without notice and ministers statements
-
North Richmond medically supervised injecting facility
-
Ministers statements: Maryborough District Health Service
-
North Richmond medically supervised injecting facility
-
Ministers statements: recreational boating and fishing
-
Member conduct
-
Ministers statements: rural and regional roads
-
WorkSafe Victoria
-
Ministers statements: community sport funding
-
WorkSafe Victoria
-
Ministers statements: Commonwealth Games
-
-
Constituency questions
-
Caulfield electorate
-
Footscray electorate
-
Gippsland South electorate
-
Ringwood electorate
-
Polwarth electorate
-
Hastings electorate
-
Shepparton electorate
-
Albert Park electorate
-
Warrandyte electorate
-
Pascoe Vale electorate
-
-
Address to Parliament
-
Adjournment
-
South-West Coast electorate roads
-
Wendouree electorate mental health services
-
Latrobe River Bridge, Tyers Road
-
Bay Trail, Point Cook, upgrades
-
Sandringham electorate public housing
-
Eating disorder strategy
-
Brunswick electorate level crossing removals
-
Bell Street, Coburg, pedestrian safety
-
Rural and regional roads
-
Shree Swaminarayan Temple
-
Responses
-
Gippsland South electorate
Danny O’BRIEN (Gippsland South) (14:36): (52) My question is to the Minister for Energy and Resources, and I ask on behalf of my constituents why the minister will not consider up-front undergrounding of transmission lines as the government considers its renewable energy zones around the state. I am very aware of the additional costs that will likely apply to underground versus overhead transmission lines, but the government has recently gone through its Victorian transmission investment framework preliminary design with a whole lot of consultation in which the vast majority of constituents – people involved with prospective overhead transmission lines – asked the question about undergrounding. The minister needs to come out and explain and give information about the potential costs and benefits of overhead versus underground. We certainly welcome the notion that the government will provide additional payments to those residents who host transmission lines – I am not sure that what is being proposed is enough – but there does need to be better explanation about whether underground is relevant and affordable for these new transmission lines.