Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee

Discussion Paper No. 1 on the Operation of Section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975
Introduction

[Back to Table of Contents]


This discussion paper on the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee’s experience in relation to Section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 is designed to be informative and stimulate thought. This may assist the Committee in its work in the potentially explosive areas of constitutional law, policy and politics. If appropriate and necessary, it may also enable some law reform to proceed in these areas.

The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee has an obligation to examine the use of Section 85 provisions in Bills before the Parliament. Its task is to assess whether the use of a particular provision is appropriate and desirable in the circumstances. In most cases, the Committee has found that the use of the provisions is appropriate and desirable in the individual circumstances of the Bill.

The Committee is composed of members from all three parties. Almost all findings of the Committee have been achieved with consensus.

The Committee is conscious of the fact that both Liberal and Labor Governments have used the practice of inserting Section 85 provisions into Bills. In some cases, the use is trivial, in others, the use may be of serious concern. The Section 85 provisions which provoke debate in Victoria are typical of provisions used in legislation in every State in Australia as well as the federal jurisdiction.

The fact that the provisions are used frequently does not necessarily make them desirable. However, clearly there are cases where restrictions in the access to the courts is in the public interest, for example, in the introduction of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal to which litigants must go before approaching a court.

The Committee seeks your views on the use of Section 85 provisions. The Committee seeks your comments so that it may be better equipped to undertake its statutory task of assessing these provisions. After the consideration of comments, it may be appropriate for the Committee to advise the Parliament as to whether there are better or more effective ways of dealing with such matters.

Victor Perton MP
Chairman


Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
© Parliament of Victoria