|
|
|
|
Alert
Digest No. 5 of 1999 25 May 1999 Appropriation (1999/2000) Bill 1.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 4 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 4 May 1999. 1.2 The Bill provides for payments from the Consolidated Fund to Departments in respect to the 1999/2000 financial year and for outstanding Departmental liabilities incurred prior to 1999/2000. 1.3 Clause 2 the Act commences on Royal Assent. The Committee makes no further comment. Appropriation (Parliament 1999/2000) Bill 2.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 4 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 4 May 1999. 2.2 The Bill provides for payments from the Consolidated Fund to the Parliament in respect to the 1999/2000 financial year and for outstanding Parliamentary liabilities incurred prior to 1999/2000 such as employee entitlements that may be realised in the future. 2.3 Clause 2 the Act commences on Royal Assent. The Committee makes no further comment. 3.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP with the Honourable Jan Wade MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 3.2 The Bill is concerned with the States ability to sever its links with the Crown in the event that the Commonwealth Parliament adopts a Republican Constitution consequent upon a referendum in accordance with section 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution. The Committee reproduces the Second Reading Speech: Mr Speaker, if the proposed Constitution Alteration (Establishment of a Republic) Bill 1999 of the Commonwealth is passed by the electors at the referendum due to be held in November, each State will need to give consideration to whether it should sever its links with the Crown. Unlike some other States, Victoria will not need to hold a state referendum to sever its links with the Crown. However, in order for the States to adopt republican constitutional arrangement, it is widely held by constitutional commentators that section 7 of the Australia Acts needs to be amended. Section 7 provides that "Her Majestys representative in each state shall be the Governor". It is generally thought that section 7 requires the continuance of monarchical arrangements for the States, although this point is disputed by some commentators. The interests of both the States and the Commonwealth will be best served by ensuring that, if the republic referendum is passed, there will be no unnecessary legal barrier to any State severing its links with the Crown. Consequently, it is desirable to amend section 7. Under section 15 of the Australia Acts, those Acts and the Statute of Westminster 1931 of the United Kingdom can be amended by the Commonwealth Parliament if it is authorised to do so by a request of each State Parliament, under section 15(1). The Commonwealth and some commentators take the view that subsection 15(3), which preserves the efficacy of powers conferred on the Commonwealth Parliament at a referendum, provides an alternative method of amending the Australia Acts. However, there is significant legal doubt about this. Moreover, all the States are agreed that it is constitutionally inappropriate to use subsection (15)3 to amend section 7. The Australia Acts primarily deal with State constitutional arrangements. To preserve the constitutional independence of the States, an alteration to the Commonwealth Constitution should not be used to change State constitutional arrangements. This Bill therefore requests the Commonwealth Parliament, under subsection (15)1 of the Australia Act, to amend section 7 so that section 7 will not prevent a State from severing its links with the Crown. Mr Speaker, the Bill is based on a model endorsed by the Solicitor-General of each State and Territory and the Commonwealth. The Bill envisages two additional subsections in section 7. The proposed subsection 7(6) will allow the Parliament of a State to make a law providing that the first five subsections of section 7 do not apply to the State. subsection 7(7) will provide that, when such a law comes into effect, those subsections will cease to apply to the State. Mr Speaker, the Commonwealth wishes to ensure that arrangements are in place prior to the referendum for the amendment of section 7. To ensure that no one State can prevent another State from severing its links with the Crown, the Commonwealth has included in the exposure draft of its Republic Bill a provision authorising amendment of section 7. The Commonwealth considers that because of the practical difficulty of procuring passage of legislation in each State under subsection 15(1) before August (when the Senate is expected to pass the Republic Bill), it is necessary to include a subsection 15(3) provision in the Republic Bill. To overcome timing problems created by the necessity to pass the Bill prior to the holding of the referendum, clause 2 of the Bill provides that the Act will only come into force if the Commonwealth Republic Bill is passed by the electors in the form in which it is approved by the Commonwealth Parliament. If the referendum fails, the Act will have no operation. 3.3 Clause 1 provides that it is the purpose of the Act to request the amendment of the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) in connection with the proposed constitutional arrangements to establish the Commonwealth of Australia as a republic. Clause 2 the provisions take effect on the day after the day on which the Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) 1999 of the Commonwealth receives the Royal Assent.
Clause 3 provides that the Parliament requests the enactment by the Commonwealth Parliament of an Act in the terms, or substantially similar terms, set out in the Schedule. Schedule The Schedule to the proposed Commonwealth Act contains the amendments to section 7 (new sub-sections (6) and (7)) of the Australia Act 1986 (Cth). Section 7 of the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) deals with the powers and functions of Her Majesty and Governors in respect of States and provides that: (1) Her Majesty's representative in each State shall be the Governor. (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) below, all powers and functions of Her Majesty in respect of a State are exercisable only by the Governor of the State. (3) Subsection (2) above does not apply in relation to the power to appoint, and the power to terminate the appointment of, the Governor of a State. (4) While Her Majesty is personally present in a State, Her Majesty is not precluded from exercising any of Her powers and functions in respect of the State that are the subject of subsection (2) above. (5) The advice to Her Majesty in relation to the exercise of the powers and functions of Her Majesty in respect of a State shall be tendered by the Premier of the State. (6) The Parliament of a State may make a law providing that the preceding subsections do not apply to the State. (7) Upon the coming into effect in a State of a law referred to in subsection (6), this section ceases to apply to the State as provided by that law. The Committee makes no further comment. Commonwealth Places (Mirror Taxes Administration) Bill 4.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 4.2 The purpose of the Bill is to implement arrangements agreed between Victoria and the Commonwealth to ensure the continuation of appropriate taxation arrangements in respect of Commonwealth places in Victoria. These include airports and office buildings acquired by the Commonwealth for a public purpose. The counterpart Commonwealth legislation, the Commonwealth Places (Mirror Taxes) Bill 1998 was introduced into the House of Representatives in March 1998 and provided for the imposition of taxes, in relation to Commonwealth places in a State, which mirror the stamp duties, payroll taxes, financial institutions duties and debits taxes of that State. 4.3 Clause 2 saving Part 6 and the Schedule, the Act comes into operation on Royal Assent. Part 6 and the Schedule comes into operation on a day to be proclaimed, which must not be a day on or after the day on which an arrangement is made under section 5. Clause 5 provides for a formal arrangement to be made between the State Governor and the Commonwealth Governor-General in relation to the exercise by a State authority of a power, duty or function under an applied law. State taxing laws will only have effect as applied laws under the Commonwealth Act in relation to Commonwealth places in Victoria while such an arrangement is in force. Clause 6 provides for the variation or revocation of such an arrangement subject to agreement between the Governor and the Governor-General. The provision corresponds to section 9 of the Commonwealth Act under which such arrangements, variations or revocations must be published in the Government Gazette. Clause 17 is a double jeopardy provision providing that an offender may not be punished under both an applied law and a law of the State for the same offence. Clause 18 permits the Governor-in-Council to make regulations for or with respect to any matter or thing necessary to be prescribed to give effect to the Act.
4.4 Clause 19 provides that the Acts specified in the Schedule are amended as set out in the respective items of that Schedule. The Acts are the:
In each of the amendments to the above Acts there is a retrospective provision to the effect that the new provisions apply, and must be taken to have always applied, on and from 6 October 1997. In this respect the Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: The Federal Treasurer announced details of this scheme in a press release on 6 October 1997. The need for the scheme arose from the 1996 decision of the High Court in Allders International v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) that stamp duty on a shop lease at Tullamarine Airport was invalid, due to the Commonwealths exclusive power under section 52(i) of the Constitution to make laws with respect to Commonwealth places. Section 52(i) provides that the Commonwealth has exclusive power to legislate with respect to all places acquired by the Commonwealth for public purposes, that is, Commonwealth places. The court determined that the effect of section 52(i) is that any State law, including a taxation law, that can be characterised as a law with respect to a Commonwealth place is, to that extent, inapplicable in Commonwealth places in the State. The decision has important ramifications for State revenue as, in addition to stamp duty on leases of the type considered in the Allders case, it is possible that other taxes imposed by States might similarly be placed at risk to the extent that the taxes affect persons, property or things done at Commonwealth places. The Courts decision also opens up the possibility of potential tax havens being created at Commonwealth places. At the request of the States, the Commonwealth in April 1998 enacted a package of legislation to give effect to a scheme to protect the States revenue. The package includes the Commonwealth Places (Mirror Taxes) Act 1998 (the Commonwealth Act), which applies State laws concerning stamp duties, pay-roll tax, financial institutions duty and debits tax to Commonwealth places in the State, to the extent to which the State taxing laws might be placed at risk because of section 52(i). The effect of the Commonwealth Act is that the State taxing laws are applied and operate in Commonwealth places as laws of the Commonwealth. The State taxing laws as so applied are referred to as the applied laws. Victoria will obtain the benefit of the Commonwealth Act only after an arrangement is entered into, as referred to in the Commonwealth Act, between the Governor-General and the Governor. The arrangement, in turn, cannot be entered into until this Bill is enacted . I emphasise that this Bill imposes no additional tax burden on the people of Victoria. It merely protects the level of revenue that the State received prior to the High Courts Allders decision. Similar legislation in relation to this scheme has already been enacted by New South Wales and passed by the Tasmanian Parliament, and has been introduced into the Western Australian Parliament. It is expected that all other States will shortly do likewise and that all States will have their legislation in place by 1 July 1999.
The Committee makes no further comment. 5.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Rob Maclellan MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 5.2 The Bill deals with the judicial management of criminal trials such as directions hearings; pre-trial disclosure and seeks to improve the efficiency of criminal trials; the bill also deals with costs liability for parties and practitioners for non-compliance with the provisions of the Act. The Bill introduces a new procedure known as a post-committal conference before a Magistrate. The Bill amends the Crimes Act 1958, Evidence Act 1958, Sentencing Act 1991 and repeals the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act 1993. 5.3 Clause 2 Part 1 commences on Royal Assent the remaining Parts commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 September 1999. Clause 3 deals with definitions including a definition for "sexual offence" has the meaning as in section 3(1) of the Evidence Act 1958. Section 3(1) of the Evidence Act 1958 provides that "sexual offence" means an offence under various subdivisions of the Crimes Act 1958. Part 2 Presentment to be filed Clause 4 deals with temporal limitations in which a presentment must be made for sexual offences and for all other offences. Part 3 Pre-trial procedure Clause 5 Directions hearing deals with the conduct of directions hearings that may be requested on application either by a party or at the courts own motion after presentment has been made and prior to trial. At a first directions hearing a court may require parties to give estimates of time expected to be needed for the trial; the number, availability and location of witnesses; details of legal representation and legal funding; and special requirements of parties and their witnesses such as interpreters. At a subsequent directions hearing the court must do one or more of the following: require the parties to advise whether they are aware of any questions that need pre-trial determination; determine an anticipated question of law or fact or a question of mixed law and fact; make orders for the filing and serving of further documents by a party under the Act; allow a party to amend a document prepared under the Act; dispense with any requirements under the Act or do anything the court may have done at the first directions hearing. Clause 6 Summary of prosecution opening and notice of pre-trial admissions at least 28 days before the commencement of the trial the prosecution must serve on the defence and file in court a summary of the prosecution opening, outlining the manner in which the prosecution will put the case against the accused and a notice of pre-trial admissions that the prosecution believes ought to be admitted as evidence without further proof such as formal matters including age, continuity or accuracy of a plan. Clause 7 Defence response to summary of prosecution opening and notice of pre-trial admissions at least 14 days before the trial the defence must serve on the prosecution and file in court a defence response to the summary of the prosecutions opening and a response to the notice of pre-trial admissions. The defence must indicate with which acts, facts, pre-trial admissions, matters and circumstances with which issue is taken and the basis on which issue is taken. The defence is not required to identify a witness other than an expert witness nor to state whether the accused will give evidence. Clause 8 Provisions applicable to prosecution and defence provides that unless there are exceptional circumstances the parties must confine themselves when opening their respective cases to the matters set out in their respective documents served and filed under Part 3 of the Act or set out in writing by a Magistrate at a post-committal conference. At trial parties are not restricted to a verbatim reading of their respective summaries. Parties must inform the court and the other party in advance if they intend to make a substantial departure from any of the pre-trial disclosure procedures introduced by the Bill. Clause 9 Expert evidence the defence must at least 14 days before the trial is due to commence serve on the prosecution and file in court a statement concerning any expert witness, including name and address, qualifications and the substance of the evidence proposed to be adduced from the expert witness, including the opinion of the witness and the acts, facts, matters and circumstances on which the opinion is formed. Clause 10 Disclosure of questions of law provides that parties must notify the court at least 14 days prior to trial (or as soon as practicable) of any questions of law that have arisen and need determination. Such questions can be determined by written submissions of the parties without the need to attend court. Clause 11 Taking of evidence from a witness prior to trial evidence may be taken prior to trial in special circumstances. Part 4 Trial Clause 12 provides that the trial judge need not be the same judge involved in the directions hearing. Rulings made at the directions hearings are binding at trial unless in the opinion of the trial judge it is not in the interests of justice that they be binding. Clause 13 Defence response to prosecutors opening in all jury trials the defence must present its response to the prosecution opening in accordance with Part 3, immediately after the prosecutions opening remarks. Clause 14 Judges address to the jury provides that after the defence response or at any time during the trial the judge may address the jury on issues in the trial or on the relevance to the conduct of the trial of any admissions made, directions given or matters determined prior to the commencement of the trial. Clause 15 Evidence at trial provides that the court may give leave for a party to introduce evidence which is a substantial departure from the evidence disclosed by the pre-trial disclosure procedures introduced by the Bill. Clause 15(2) the judge may allow the prosecutor to reopen the prosecution case in reply to evidence given by the defence which could not reasonably have been foreseen by the prosecution having regard to the pre-trial procedures introduced by the Bill. This is an additional discretionary power to allow the reopening of the prosecution case which does not alter any previous existing common law or statutory right existing prior to the amendments made by the Bill allowing the prosecution to reopen its case. Clause 16 Comment on departure or failure provides that the trial judge or with the leave of the court a party, may make a comment to the jury which the trial judge considers appropriate on a partys failure to comply with a requirement of this Act or a departure referred to in clause 15 above. The comment must be relevant and not likely to produce a miscarriage of justice. The comment must not suggest that an inference of guilt may be drawn from the departure or the failure of an accused to adduce evidence from a particular witness, or that the failure may be taken into account in considering the probative value of the prosecution evidence, except where such an inference might have been otherwise drawn before the enactment of the provisions of this Bill.
Clause 17 Names of defence witnesses provides that at the close of the prosecution case the trial judge must call on the defence to indicate the names of the defence witnesses, other than the accused, that the defence intends to call to give evidence at the trial. Clause 18 Cross-examination provides that after hearing submissions on the proposed cross-examination of a witness, the trial judge may disallow or forbid questions put in cross-examination which appear to the judge to be not relevant to facts in issue or are repetitive or oppressive in nature. Clause 19 Jury documents deals with documents that may be given to the jury including documents created under the provisions of the Bill such as prosecution summaries and defence responses pursuant to sections 6 and 7, the opening and closing speeches of the parties, the address of the judge pursuant to section 14, transcripts of evidence and audio and visual recordings. The new provisions in the Bill that add to the list of documents that the jury may have recourse to are: 19(1)(a) the presentment, 19(1)(c) the defence response to the summary of the prosecution opening and the defence response to the notice of pre-trial admissions. (the current provision requires the accuseds consent before the jury may have access to the defence response) and, 19(1)(f) transcripts of any audio or audio visual recordings. Clause 20 Manner of giving evidence provides that evidence may be given by alternative means including, with the consent of the parties, by reading a prepared statement; expert witnesses may give evidence by presenting audio visual material; by means of playing audio or audio visual recordings or in a manner that the trial judge considers may be of assistance. The section does not derogate from the necessity of witnesses being subject to cross-examination or the necessity of their physical appearance before the court. Clause 21 Retrial provides that if there is a retrial, directions given at the first trial may be treated as directions in the retrial, except where it would be inconsistent with an order made on an appeal or otherwise would be unjust to do so. Part 5 General Clause 22 Power to extend time allows the court on the motion of a party or on its own motion to abridge or extend time for the doing of a thing under the Act, even when the time for the doing of the thing has expired. Clause 23 provides that each party must advise the sheriff within the meaning of the Juries Act 1967 as soon as practicable of any event or circumstance that may affect whether or not, or when, a jury may be required for the trial. Clauses 24 to 26 Costs gives the court wide costs discretions and deals with costs sanctions that may be made against a party or their legal representatives for any unreasonable act or omission or non-compliance with the provisions and requirements of the Act. Where an accused and his or her representatives have complied with the provisions of the Act and the proceedings is discontinued through no fault attributable to the accused or his or her representatives an indemnity certificate may be granted pursuant to the Appeals Costs Act 1998. Legal practitioners may also be liable for any costs incurred improperly or without reasonable cause or that are wasted by undue delay, misconduct, negligence or default. Clause 27 provides that a legal practitioner must advise the court at least 7 days prior to the trial that he or she is briefed to appear for an accused and may only withdraw with the leave of the court, once having so advised. The court is given an additional costs sanction against a practitioner for an unreasonable late withdrawal. Clause 28 provides the court a power to report a legal practitioner to the Legal Practice Board or the Legal Ombudsman for a failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or an order made pursuant to the Act. Clause 29 a judge is not prevented from presiding at a trial simply because he or she made a ruling or gave directions at an earlier trial founded on substantially the same facts or offences. Clause 30 service of documents under this Act, by the prosecutor, may be made by registered post to the business address of the legal representative of the accused. Clause 33 provides that the provisions of the Bill only apply to an accused committed for trial after the commencement of this Act and makes other transitional amendments relating to the Act to be repealed. Part 6 Amendments and repeal of certain Acts Clause 34 makes amendments to the Crimes Act 1958 including allowing an application for extension of time for the commencement of a trial orally and unless the court orders otherwise, without the necessity of supporting documentation. Clause 35 amends the Evidence Act 1958 and enables the evidence obtained in an earlier trial on the same or a related offence to be used in a subsequent trial in certain circumstances, such as where the witness has subsequently died or cannot, after diligent search be found, has become incapable of giving evidence or is being kept out of the way to avoid giving evidence. Magistrates Court Act 1989 (the Act) Clause 36(2) inserts a new clause 24(1)(c) in Schedule 5 imposes an obligation upon a Magistrate to warn a defendant that it is his or her responsibility to make application to Victoria Legal Aid for assistance to be legally aided. Clause 36(2) also inserts new clauses 24(4) to 24(9) into Schedule 5 of the Act providing that at the request of a party the Magistrate may conduct a post-committal conference procedure at which the prosecution must disclose the main evidence it relies on to support a finding of guilt; to identify any matter that can be resolved prior to trial; to identify witnesses that need not be called to give evidence; to determine which matters may be admitted without further proof; and identify what evidence is in dispute by the defendant and the reasons for such dispute. If a party requests such a conference the parties must attend. The magistrate must prepare a written record of such a conference to be signed by the parties and state that the matters disclosed or identified at the conference may be disclosed at the trial. Whether or not a post-committal conference is held the magistrate may recommend a directions hearing under section 5 of the Bill may be desirable. Clause 37 amends the Sentencing Act 1991 and inserts a new section 5(2D) to allow a court, in determining a sentence, to take into account the extent of compliance or non-compliance of the requirements imposed on the offender by the provisions introduced by the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act 1999. Clause 38 repeals the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act 1993. The Committee makes no further comment. Electricity Industry Acts (Further Amendment) Bill 6.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 6.2 The Bill amends two Acts governing the electricity industry, the Electricity Industry Act 1993 and the Electricity Safety Act 1998. 6.3 Clause 2 saving section 8 the amendments made by the Bill come into operation on Royal Assent. Section 8 commences on proclamation but not later than by 1 July 2000. Electricity Industry Act 1993 Clause 5 amends section 47C(1) dealing with the Ministers powers in electricity emergency supply circumstances. The new sub-section (e) will allow the Minister to make a direction whilst an emergency proclamation is in force to regulate the use of the available supply of electricity, having regard to the needs of the community. Clause 6 further clarifies offences against directions given under 47D (relating to offences in electricity supply emergencies) and deals with continuing offences and offences by a body corporate. Clause 7 inserts a new section 47G providing for immunity from suit in the case of a declared electricity supply emergency [Refer: 6.4 Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975]. Clause 8 inserts new sections 47H to 47M dealing with standard powers of search and entry. New 47H deals with search and entry with the written consent of the occupier. New 47J deals with search and entry by warrant pursuant to the procedures and forms under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. Clause 9 inserts a new Part 3AA dealing with infringement notices for offences under 47C (above). 47O provides the power to serve a notice; 47P deals with the form and content of the notice; 47Q deals with penalties; and 47T provides that payment of the penalty expiates the offence with no conviction being recorded against the person for that offence and no further proceedings may be taken against the person for that offence. 47U provides that payment of the penalty is not to be taken as an admission of guilt in relation to that offence and is not an admission of liability in any other related civil proceedings. 47V deals with prosecution of offences after infringement notice has been served and the penalty remains unpaid or where the notice has been withdrawn. 6.4 Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968) Clause 12 insert a new section 91C into the Act declaring that it is the intention of section 47G to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The new 47G is located in Part 3A of the Act dealing with electricity supply emergency provisions and provides: 47G. A person acting in good faith in the execution of this Part or any proclamation or direction under this Part is not liable to any action, claim or demand on account of any damage, loss or injury sustained or alleged to be sustained because of the operation of this Part or of any thing done or purporting to be done under this Part or any proclamation or direction under this Part. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Section 85 Constitution Act Statement I wish to make a statement pursuant to section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 of the reasons why that section should be altered or varied by clause 12 of the Bill. Clause 12 inserts a new section 91C into the Electricity Industry Act 1993 stating that it is the intention of section 47G of that Act to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. Section 47G replaces the existing section 47G which presently provides for immunity from suit for certain persons or bodies exercising a power under Part 3A of the Electricity Industry Act 1993. Part 3A contains the electricity supply emergency provisions. The replacement section 47G provides an immunity from suit for any person acting in good faith in the execution of Part 3A or any proclamation or direction under that Part. The reason for altering or varying section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 is to ensure that persons acting under Part 3A of the Electricity Industry Act in a declared emergency are immune from suit. These people are acting in the public interest. It is vital that those charged with responsibility for preserving system security and safety have the confidence to respond to any emergency free from the risk of personal or corporate liability. This immunity provision is founded directly in the public interest and in the need to ensure that the relevant person or corporation and third parties involved have confidence to protect the public interest.
6.5 Electricity Safety Act 1998. Clause 15 inserts new sections 141(2)(c) and (b) of the Act to add to the directions which the Chief Electrical Inspector may give under the section dealing with electricity safety matters. Clause 16 inserts a new section 141A in the Act to provide the Chief Electrical Inspector additional powers to give directions necessary to make an electricity emergency situation safe. It is an offence to fail to comply with such a direction. New section 141B provides: The Chief Electrical Inspector may, with the approval of the Minister, by instrument, delegate any function or power of the Chief Electrical Inspector under section 141 or 141A to an officer or employee of the Office.
The Committee makes no further comment. Estate Agents (Amendment) Bill 7.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Rob Maclellan MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 7.2 The Bill amends the Estate Agents Act 1980 to make provision with respect to estate agency offices in retail shopping centres; provides standard inspectorial powers in relation to estate agents; provides for the issuing of infringement notices in relation to certain offences; and makes provision with respect to the payment of money to estate agents and the audit of the accounts of estate agents. The Bill also amends the Fundraising Appeals Act 1998 to further clarify activities not classified as a fundraising appeal. 7.3 Clause 2 Parts 1 and 6 commence operation on Royal Assent the remaining Parts commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 February 2000. Clause 6 inserts a new section 49B, providing that the amount payable to an estate agent by the principal for outgoings must not exceed the actual amount payable by the agent for those outgoings and clause 7 inserts a new section 50(4A) and provides for an indictable offence for the contravention of section 49B with penalties of up to five years imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 600 penalty units ($60,000) Clause 8 provides that where a person directs the agent in writing, the agent may make a direct payment on behalf of that person to a third person without the necessity of the agent first depositing that money in the agents trust account. Clause 9 provides that where an audit reveals that the agent has contravened the Act or regulations in relation to the keeping of trust accounts the Director of Fair Trading may recover the costs of the audit from the estate agent. Clause 13 repeals section 70 of the Act which dealt with the auditing of trust accounts required to be held by estate agents. The new provisions dealing with such audits are contained in the new Part VIIA inserted by clause 14. Clause 14 inserts a new Part VIIA into the Act dealing with inspectors powers. The Committee has previously reported on the standard provisions relating to inspectors powers in the Fair Trading Bill 1999 and the Fair Trading (Inspectors Powers) Bill 1999 reported in Alert Digests Nos. 2 and 4 of 1999 respectively. The inspectors powers are consistent with those applicable to other industries regulated by the Office of Fair Trading and Business Affairs. The Committee however makes the following further observations. New section 91C provides that a licensed estate agent must at all reasonable times at each office at which the agent carries on business keep all trust accounts which relate to the business carried out by that agent at that office and all other documents relating to that business available for inspection by an inspector. New section 91L deals with the issue of search warrants pursuant to the forms and procedures under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. New section 91V deals with the rule against self-incrimination and provides:
New section 91X provides that certain sections of the Fair Trading Act 1999 apply as though they were provisions of the Act, they are: sections 120 (inspectors to be permitted to enter premises open to the public and are permitted to purchase products on sale to the public); section 135 (offence to hinder or obstruct inspector); section 136 (offence to impersonate an inspector); section 137 (inspectors to report exercise of powers of entry to Director); section 138 (Director to keep register of such reports); and section 139 (Director to investigate complaints). Clause 15 inserts a new sections 92D and 92E into the Act dealing with the production of information related to the business of a licensed estate agent to the Business Licensing Authority. New section 92E deals with the rule against self-incrimination pursuant to section 92D and is in the same form to new section 91V above. Clause 17 inserts a new Division 2 of Part VIII (new sections 98 and 98A to 98J) into the Act dealing with infringement notices. New section 98J provides that the issue of an infringement notice does not prevent the conduct of an inquiry under sections 25 and 28 of the Act by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal or the taking of disciplinary action under section 28A into an estate agent for any act or omission for which the notice was issued. The provisions are the standard infringement notice sections examined by the Committee in other Bills without adverse comment. Clause 18 makes amendments to the regulation making powers in section 99 and inserts a new section 99(gh) allowing regulations to be made in respect to the provisions concerning infringement notices inserted into the Act by clause 17 above.
Clause 19 amends section 5(3)(c) of the Fundraising Appeals Act 1998 to provide that soliciting or receiving a benefit on behalf of an organisation from a current member of the organisation is an exception to the definition of fundraising appeal. The Committee makes no further comment. 8.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Pat McNamara MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 8.2 The Bill makes an amendment to the Food Act 1984 to clarify provisions relating to the registration of food premises and food vehicles. 8.3 Clause 2 the amendment commences on Royal Assent. Clause 3 provides that in section 19C sub-section (3) is repealed. Section 19C currently provides: 19C. Declaration that this Part applies to premises or vehicles (1) The Secretary may, by notice published in the Government Gazette, declare that food premises or food vehicles of a particular class are to have food safety programs. (2) In making a declaration, the Secretary must specify that the declaration is to take effect on a specified date on or after the making of the declaration. (3) The registration authority must not register, renew the registration or grant the transfer of registration of any premises or vehicle on or after the date it becomes a declared premises or vehicle unless it is satisfied that an adequate food safety program exists for the premises or vehicle. The intent of the repeal is explained in the comments of the Minister in the Second Reading Speech: The amendment to the Food Act 1984 that I am introducing today will clarify this goal by removing a clause in the Act which has been interpreted to place a greater burden on Local Government than was intended to occur. The clause 19C(3), in its current form, requires the Council to be satisfied as to the adequacy of the Food Safety Program prior to its registering the food business. It has been more broadly interpreted to place on Local Government an obligation to also validate the adequacy of a plan to, in its practice, deliver safe food. In effect, this transfers responsibility for the performance of the Food Safety Program from business to Local Government The proposed amendment to the Food Act will provide necessary clarity in operational arrangements without compromising the aim of the Safe Food Strategy. Through this amendment, the responsibility for safe food production will clearly belong solely to the food business and the preventative practices it has in place. It will improve the administrative processes within Local Government by removing an implied legal responsibility which impedes their role as independent regulator. It will not, however, remove or diminish their important public health role in remaining vigilant to threats to the community health posed by unsafe business practices. The repeal of section 19C(3) will not have an impact on the requirement for the proprietors of food premises to have an adequate Food Safety Program in place of the registration procedures required under the Act as those requirements can be found in other parts of the Act. The Committee makes no further comment. Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill 9.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Rob Maclellan MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 9.2 The Bill amends the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the Act) with respect to the disclosure of documents affecting personal privacy and makes a number of consequential amendments to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998. 9.3 Clause 2 provides that the amendments come into operation on 1 July 1999. Clause 3 inserts a new Part IIIA into the Act dealing with documents containing personal information. The Committee notes the Attorney-Generals comments in the Second Reading Speech: The Act does not define information which relates to the personal affairs of any person. Existing Victorian caselaw has held that a persons name or other identifying details do amount to personal information and so render a document containing that information exempt. That is, as I have said, releasable with the deletion of that information. In the past, departments have removed personal information from requested documents on this basis. The recent Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision of Coulston, however, went against this line of authority. In that case, the Tribunal ruled that a hospital roster showing the names of nursing staff on duty on a particular night did not contain the personal information of those nurses and was, as a result, releasable under the Act. As the Tribunal ruled that the roster did not contain information which related to the personal affairs of another, it did not need to determine whether the release of the document would amount to an unreasonable disclosure. Because the applicant in the decision was a convicted murderer, certain alarm was raised by the effect of the decision because it was thought that the safety of the nurses was put at risk by the release of their names to the applicant. New section 27A provides a definition for "personal information" for the purposes of the Part to mean information that identifies any person or discloses their address or location or from which any persons identity address or location can reasonably be determined. New section 27B provides that the provisions of the Part do not apply to information that is obtainable through other documents generally available to the public for inspection or purchase. New section 27C provides that personal information is not to be made available except by order of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). An agency or Minister may grant access where the information has been removed from the document. Where such a grant is made, or an application for access is refused, the applicant for the information must be told of a right to apply to VCAT under 27D. New section 27D provides that an applicant refused access to a document under the Part may apply to VCAT for an order that full access be provided. If practicable, a third party to which the personal information relates (the third party) must be informed by the agency or Minister of the application. The third party may consent to the access to the applicant or notify VCAT that they intend to intervene in the proceeding to refuse access to the document. New section 27E allows VCAT to grant access to the document if there is no objection by the agency, the Minister and the third party for its release to the applicant. New section 27F allows VCAT to grant access to a document if it is satisfied that access to it by the applicant is reasonable in all the circumstances. VCAT may consider such criteria as the use the applicant might make of a document and may not allow access where such access is against the public interest or where access would be likely to endanger the life or physical safety of any person. In this respect it is the applicant that has the onus of establishing that it would be reasonable in all the circumstances for access to the document to be granted. New section 27G provides that where VCAT grants access it must if practicable give notice of the order to the person to whom the personal information relates (where that party did not intervene in the application). In such circumstances the order does not take effect for 28 days after the making of the order unless the person is sooner notified of the order. Clause 5 makes consequential amendments to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 allowing third parties to intervene in a proceeding under Part IIIA of the Act in respect of the document containing personal information. The Committee makes no further comment. Gas Industry Acts (Further Amendment) Bill 10.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 10.2 The Bill makes amendments to the Gas Industry Act 1994, Gas Pipelines Access (Victoria) Act 1998, Gas Safety Act 1997 and certain other Acts. 10.3 Clause 2 provides for the commencement of the respective provisions of the Bill as follows: (1) This Act, except sections 9, 14, 21 and 34, comes into operation on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent. (2) Section 14 is deemed to have come into operation on 11 December 1997. (3) Section 21 is deemed to have come into operation on 2 February 1999. (4) Subject to sub-section (5), sections 9 and 34 come into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed. (5) If a provision referred to in sub-section (4) does not come into operation before 1 July 2000, it comes into operation on that day. Gas Industry Act 1994 (the Act) Clause 5 inserts a new section 5(5) into the Act and provides: The pipeline referred to in Council made under sub-section (1)(a) on 10 March 1999 and published in the Government Gazette on 11 March 1999, pages 632 and 633, is deemed to have been declared under sub-section (1) on 16 December 1998 to be a transmission pipeline. Section 5(1)(a) provides that the Governor-in-Council, by Order published in the Government Gazette may declare a pipeline or class of pipeline to be a transmission pipeline.
Clause 8 provides for significantly increased penalties for failure to comply with directions given by VENCorp in respect to gas safety, reliability and security of supply under section 16H of the Act. Clause 9 inserts a new Part 2A into the Act dealing with inspectors powers (new sections 31A to 31I ). New section 31A allows the Chief Executive Officer of VENCorp to appoint an officer or employee of VENCorp or an agent or contractor of VENCorp to be an inspector for the purpose of the Part. New section 31B deals with powers of entry either by consent of the occupier or with a search warrant. New section 31D makes provision for the issue of search warrants pursuant to the forms and procedures under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. New section 31G provides that it is an offence to obstruct an inspector exercising functions under the Part. New section 31H allows an inspector to seek assistance from a member of the police force to take action authorised under the Part. Clause 14 inserts a new section 50(2A) in respect of agreements for operations entered into under that section. Section 50 generally deals with agreements for the operation of pipelines. The provision is deemed to have commenced on 11 December 1997. The current section 50 (which repealed the original section 50) was inserted by s.18 of Act No. 91 of 1997 and commenced operation on 11 December 1997.
Clause 15 amends section 62G(1) to allow the Minister may, whilst an emergency gas supply proclamation is in force, to provide for directions to regulate the use of the available supply of gas, having regard to the needs of the community. Section 62F and 62G deal with emergency gas supply provisions such as Governor-in-Council proclamations, Ministerial directions, and prohibitions and restrictions in such emergency circumstances. Clause 16 inserts a new section 62HA and provides that it is an offence to obstruct a person carrying out a direction under section 62G. Clause 17 substitutes a new section 62J dealing with offences under 62G. The penalties are increased substantially from 5 penalty units to 100 for a natural person to up to 10,000 p.u. for a body corporate. The clause also inserts new sections 62JA and 62JB dealing with offences by bodies corporate, partnerships and unincorporated associations. Clause 18 amends section 62L to provide that the immunity contained in that section only applies to persons acting in good faith [Refer: 10.4 Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975]. Clause 19 inserts sections 62LA to 62LE in the Act to provide in the case of declared emergencies, for powers of entry and enforcement by inspectors of the Office of Gas Safety in the case of alleged contraventions of Part 6A of that Act. The sections further provide for searches including the issue of search warrants pursuant to the forms and procedures under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. Clause 20 inserts a new Part 6AA in the Act providing for infringement notices in the case of use of gas by a person in contravention of a direction, prohibition or requisition under section 62G (emergency supply circumstances) of that Act. The Part provides that inspectors of the Office of Gas Safety may serve infringement notices, the form of those notices and fixes the penalties. It also contains provisions as to payment and enforcement of penalties, withdrawal of infringement notices and prosecution after service of an infringement notice. Clause 21 amends section 62PA(1) by inserting after the words section 46N in paragraph (a) the additional words on 2 February 1999. Section 62PA(1)(a) will then read For the purpose of Part IV of the Trade Practices Act and the Competition Code the following are specifically authorised (a) the making of rules under Section 48N on 2 February 1999. The Explanatory Memorandum states Clause 21 amends the statutory authorisation of the MSO Rules (the Market and System Operation Rules) contained in section 62PA of the Gas Industry Act. The Second Reading Speech contains no additional assistance as to why the amendment refers to 2 February 1999 and whether this gives the amendment retrospective operation.
Clause 24 inserts a new section 102(1)(xa) providing that regulations may be made for the appointment of a registrar of the appeal tribunal.
10.4 Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968) Clause 26 inserts a new section 101B(3) into the Act and declares that it is the intention of section 62L as amended by clause 18 (above) to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Section 85 Constitution Act Statement Clause 26 inserts a new section 101B(3) into the Gas Industry Act 1994 stating that it is the intention of section 62L of that Act, as amended by the Gas Industry Acts (Further Amendment) Act 1999, to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. Clause 18 of the Bill amends the section 62L of the Gas Industry Act which presently provides for immunity from suit for certain persons or bodies exercising a power under Part 6A of the Gas Industry Act 1994. Part 6A contains the gas supply emergency provisions. Section 62L as amended provides an immunity from suit for any person acting in good faith in the execution of Part 6A or of any proclamation, direction, prohibition or requisition under that Part. The reason for altering or varying section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 is to ensure that persons acting under Part A of the Gas Industry Act in a declared emergency are immune from suit. These people are acting in the public interest. It is vital that those charged with responsibility for preserving system security and safety have the confidence to respond to any emergency free from the risk of personal or corporate liability. This immunity provision is founded directly in the public interest and in the need to ensure that the relevant person or corporation and third parties involved have confidence to protect the public interest.
10.5 Gas Safety Act 1997 (the Act) Clause 32 amends sections 86, 103 and 104 to provide for inspectors appointed under the Act to also act as inspectors under the Gas Industry Act 1994 and prescribes the conditions on which the Office of Gas Safety may appoint agents or contractors as inspectors. Clause 33 inserts a new section 107(1A) into the Act giving the Director of Gas Safety additional authority to make directions in a gas emergency to regulate the use of available supplies of gas with regard to the needs of the community and to facilitate the reliability and security of the gas supply. Such directions given must be reported in the annual report pursuant to the new section 107(3). Clause 34 clarifies that immunity from suit applies to the Director, the Office and the servants of the Office, in the execution of any direction under the Division (dealing with directions and additional powers in emergencies). The clause amends the provisions of section 109 and 109A that were inserted in the Act by s.31 of Act No. 91 1998 (not yet in force). The Committee reported on those amendments in Alert Digest No. 1 of 1999 at pages 21 and 22 in relation to the Gas Industry Acts (Amendment) Bill (now Act No. 91/1998 but not yet in force). Extract from Act No. 91 of 1998. 31. New sections 109 and 109A inserted For section 109 of the Gas Safety Act 1997 substitute "109. Protection from liability The Director is not liable to any action, claim or demand on account of any damage, loss or injury sustained or alleged to be sustained because of anything done or omitted to be done in good faith (a) in or in connection with or incidental to the exercise of a power under, or purportedly under, section 106 or 107; or (b) in the reasonable belief that the act or omission was in or in connection with or incidental to the exercise of such a power. 109A. Protection of persons executing directions A person is not liable to any action, claim or demand on account of any damage, loss or injury sustained or alleged to be sustained because of anything done or omitted to be done in good faith (a) in the execution of any direction under, or purportedly under, section 106 or 107; or (b) in the reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the execution of such a direction.". 32. New section 117A inserted in Part 7 of the Gas Safety Act 1997, before section 118, insert "117A. Supreme Court limitation of jurisdiction It is the intention of sections 109 and 109A to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.".
Clause 36 amends section 2 of the Gas Industry (Amendment) Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) by inserting a new section 2(3A) providing that sections 7, 9 and 13 come into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed. The Committee reported on the Bill (as it then was) in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1998 at page 30. The Explanatory Memorandum of the Bill provides that Those sections relate to the transfer of functions to VENCorp Pty Ltd and the day on which that may occur is not fixed. The commencement provisions contained in the 1998 Act provided that sections 7, 9 and 13 would commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 January 2000.
Clause 37 inserts a new section 2(6A) in the Gas Industry Acts (Amendment) Act 1998 providing that sections 31 and 32 come into operation on a day to be proclaimed. Sections 31 and 32 are also referred to in clause 34 above, dealing with the amendments made by the Act to sections 109 and 109A of the Gas Safety Act 1997. As provided in the 1998 Act, sections 31 and 32 were to come into operation on proclamation but not later than by 1 December 1999. The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 8 of 1998 at page 7 and also in No. 1 of 1999 at page 21.
The Committee makes no further comment. Interactive Gaming (Player Protection) Bill 11.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 11.2 The Bill makes provision for the protection of persons participating in interactive games by regulating the provision of interactive gaming services and services providers. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: It is important to emphasise that this Bill is not the key to enabling or facilitating interactive gaming. The Bill recognises that interactive gaming is already occurring and will continue to occur via the Internet, and that prohibiting the playing of interactive games in the home is not a realistic or practical option. Instead, this Bill aims to protect the interests and entitlements of players of interactive games by giving them the opportunity to deal with well regulated and licensed firms, as a more secure alternative to dealing with unregulated firms overseas. The legislation does not create any offences for players as these would be totally unenforceable. Instead it employs a "carrot" rather than a "stick" approach by giving players an opportunity, if they so desire, to deal with providers who have been subject to probity assessment and who offer games that have been tested to ensure they are fair and not offered in a misleading manner. The Bill also provides players with the assurance that there is a regulator with whom they can lodge complaints in the event they feel aggrieved by anything done by a licensed provider. The regulation and licensing of interactive gaming service providers will be within a national co-operative scheme, in accordance with the principles of a draft National Regulatory Model released for public comment in May 1997 after a meeting of State and Territories Gaming Ministers. Interactive games may be broadly defined as those involving gambling for money or prizes via the internet or some other telecommunications device, but excluding pre-existing gambling products already regulated under other legislation. 11.3 Clause 2 provides that sections 1 and 2 commence on Royal Assent and the remaining provisions commence on proclamation.
Clause 5 defines the meaning of "interactive game" and the exclusions from the Act. Clause 6 provides that on the recommendation of the Minister, the Governor-in-Council may declare another State or Territory to be a participating jurisdiction for the purposes of the Act, if an agreement about administrative and taxation arrangements is in force. Clause 7 the Act applies outside Victoria to the full extent of the Parliaments extraterritorial legislative powers. Clause 16 deals with applications for licences on prescribed forms and accompanied by prescribed information and fees. Clause 18 deals with conditions for granting an application for a licence, including that the person be a suitable person to hold a licence. Clause 19 further amplifies the criteria to be applied to determine whether a person is suitable to hold a licence, including the applicants and applicants associates character or business reputation, financial position and background, corporate structure and appropriate resources. Clause 19(1)(f) provides and anything else prescribed under the regulations.
Clause 20 deals with the criteria the Authority may have regard to in determining the suitability of an associate of an applicant for a licence including current financial position and background, character and business reputation and anything else prescribed under the regulations. Clause 21 deals with updating of applications if there is a change in circumstances or particulars, by the provision of further information by prospective licence holders to the Authority prior to a licence being granted or refused. Clause 22 provides that the Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority (the Authority) may investigate an applicant or an associate of an applicant whether that person is a suitable person to be licensed to hold an interactive gaming license. Clause 24 deals with the determination of applications for a licence and 24(4) provides that: The Authority is not required to give reasons for its decision on an application but may give reasons if it thinks fit.
Clause 25 allows the Authority to change the conditions of a licence if a change in the condition is in the public interest. Clause 27 allows a licence holder to surrender a licence with the consent of the Authority. The Authority may refuse consent in certain circumstances. Clause 28 deals with the grounds for disciplinary action to be taken in relation to licence holders and clause 29 deals with the cancellation, suspension or variation of a licence. Clause 30 allows the Authority to conduct ongoing investigations and monitoring of associates or persons likely to become associates of a licensee. The Authority may require the licensee to terminate an association within a specified time and clause 30(6) provides that the Authority may require such a person to consent to the taking of their photograph, finger prints and palm prints and allows the Authority to give the Chief Commissioner of Police a copy of such material. Clause 31 allows the Authority to investigate licensed providers and their associates in circumstances where the Authority reasonably suspects that the provider is no longer a suitable person to hold an interactive gaming licence. Clause 32 when carrying out an investigation the Authority may by written request require the person to give information or provide a document relevant to the investigation. It is an offence to fail to comply with a request without reasonable excuse. Clause 32(4) provides that: It is a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with the requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person. Clause 35 provides that in certain circumstances such as death or insolvency, a licence will lapse if not endorsed within 90 days. Clause 36 provides that returns to players on interactive gaming devices must not be less than 85 per centum or such higher amount as is determined by the Authority and published in the Government Gazette. Clause 38 fixes the gaming tax at 50 per centum, or such other amount as is prescribed to be paid to the Consolidated Revenue. Clause 42 deals with revenue offences by licensed providers and provides for first time penalties of up to $60,000 (600 p.u.). Clause 43 the Authority may by written notice to licensees give directions about the conduct of authorised games by licensed providers. Clause 45 a licensed provider must not provide credit to a player. Clauses 48 and 49 respectively deal with player self-imposed limits on amounts wagered and self-exclusion orders. Clause 54 requires licensed providers to investigate complaints made against them and provide a response of the result of the inquiry within 21 days to the complainant and the Authority. Clause 55 to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest, the clause allows the Authority to restrict participation by its employees in certain approved gaming activities under the Act. Clause 56 provides that inspectors appointed under the Gaming and Betting Act 1994 are inspectors under the Act. Clause 57 allows inspectors entry to licensed premises at any time to monitor compliance under the Act. Clause 58 inspectors have powers to require persons to answer questions or provide information; to inspect equipment; take copies of documents; seize any relevant equipment or records; require the licence provider or associate to attend before an inspector to answer questions or provide information at a specified time and place; examine and test equipment on the premises; request assistance from a member of the police force in circumstances of obstruction or expected obstruction in the exercise of duties and functions under the Act. Clause 60 provides for search warrants pursuant to the forms and procedures under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. Clause 61 deals with offences relating to the obstruction of inspectors; Clause 65 requires licensed providers to furnish the Authority with certain information relating to their operations for the assistance of law enforcement agencies; Clause 66 the Authority may hold inquiries and be deemed to be a board appointed by the Governor-in-Council and the Evidence Act 1958 then applies accordingly; and Clause 67 a person may be represented at such an inquiry. Clause 68 deals with appeals by persons whose interests are affected by a decision of the Authority under the Act to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal on matters other than non-reviewable decisions. A "non-reviewable decision" means a decision to approve, or refuse to approve, an interactive game or the rules of an interactive game or a decision about probity or a decision under Part 4. Part 4 deals with returns to players and taxation policy matters relevant to interactive gaming. Clause 69 deals with secrecy provisions relating to information obtained pursuant to the Act. Clause 70 deals with the destruction of finger and palm prints obtained by the Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Act in circumstances where the application is refused or the licence is cancelled or surrendered or is no longer in force. Clause 71 allows the Authority to delegate certain functions to one or more members of the Authority or to the Director of Gaming and Betting appointed under the Gaming and Betting Act 1994 other than the power to delegate or a function under sections 16, 21, 25, 27 or 35 (each referred to above).
Clause 72 provides that the Governor-in-Council may make regulations for or with respect to any matter or thing required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed or necessary to be prescribed to give effect to the Act. Clauses 73 to 77 make consequential amendments to other gaming related Acts. The Committee makes no further comment. Longford Royal Commission (Report) Bill 12.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 12 May 1999 by the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 13 May 1999. 12.2 The purpose of the Bill is to make provision for the publication of the report of the Longford Royal Commission. The Bill is only to be commenced if the report is handed down when Parliament is not sitting. In that event the report will be received by the Governor and the Minister is to deliver a copy to the Clerk of each House of the Parliament. Following this procedure the Bill authorises the report to be published without further formality by the Government Printer. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Accordingly the Bill provides that once the report is received by the Governor, the Minister is to deliver a copy to the Clerk of each House of Parliament, and require the Government Printer to publish the report. A report provided to a Clerk of a House of Parliament pursuant to these provisions will be deemed to have been ordered to be printed by that House and a copy of the report as published shall be tabled on the next sitting day of that House. In addition, the Bill provides that the publication of a report in accordance with the procedure set out in the Bill is absolutely privileged and that sections 73 and 74 of the Constitution Act apply to that report. Members should be aware that procedures similar to those contained in this Bill have been used in other Australian Parliaments. In particular, reference is made to section 14B of the New South Wales Royal Commissions Act 1923 and to Senate Standing Order 166(2). I am sure that all members will support this Bill as it will ensure prompt public access to the findings of the Royal Commission into the Longford incident. In addition, it will ensure that the published report will attract absolute privilege as if it was printed by order of Parliament in the conventional manner. 12.3 Clause 2 provides that the Act comes into operation on a day to be proclaimed. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Members will see from clause 2 that the Bill is to commence on a day to be proclaimed. Members should be aware that it may not be necessary to commence this Bill if the Parliament is sitting at the time the Royal Commission report is delivered.
Clause 4 provides for the publication of the report of the Longford Royal Commission in the event that Parliament is not in session at the time the report is handed down to the Governor. The Committee makes no further comment. Prostitution Control (Amendment) Bill 13.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Bill McGrath MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 13.2 The main purpose of the Bill is to amend the Prostitution Control Act 1994 (the Act) so as to facilitate the prosecution of persons who operate a brothel or escort agency without holding a licence and to confer certain powers on inspectors appointed under the Fair Trading Act 1999. The Bill also amends the definition of "sexual services" and amends the Summary Offences Act 1966 so as to regulate the advertising of live sexually-explicit entertainment. The Bill further amends the Confiscation Act 1997 so as to create new forfeiture offences. 13.3 Clause 2 provides: (1) This Act (except sections 4(2) and (3), 5, 6, 12, 21, 22 and 26) comes into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent. (2) Subject to sub-section (3), sections 4(2) and (3), 5, 6(1) and 26 come into operation on a day to be proclaimed. (3) If a provision referred to in sub-section (2) does not come into operation before 1 September 1999, it comes into operation on that day. (4) Subject to sub-section (5), sections 6(2), 12, 21 and 22 come into operation on a day to be proclaimed. (5) If a provision referred to in sub-section (4) does not come into operation before 1 February 2000, it comes into operation on that day. Clause 4 inserts a number of new definitions into the Act and substitutes a new definition for "sexual services" to encompass acts described as "lap dancing" and "peep show". Clause 5 inserts a new section 3A into the Act to deem that in certain circumstances the payment of an admission charge to premises can constitute payment for sexual services for the purpose of determining whether a person is a prostitution services provider. Clause 7 amends section 22(1) and makes it clear that the fault element of the offence is "knowingly or recklessly" providing prostitution services without a licence. The maximum penalty is increased from 360 penalty units to 600 penalty units ($60,000). The offence also attracts a maximum Level 6 imprisonment (5 years) which remains unchanged. Clause 8 inserts a new section 22(1A) creating a new strict liability offence of carrying on a business as a prostitution services provider without a licence without the requirement of proof of knowledge or recklessness (as in clause 7). It is a defence to such an offence that the person was under a mistaken but honest belief about facts which, had they existed, would have meant that the conduct would not have constituted the offence. For example, that a licence had been issued, or was still valid or that the business carried on at the premises did not involve the provision of prostitution. Maximum penalty for the new offence is 240 penalty units ($24,000). The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Police have been hampered in their efforts to prosecute illegal operators. The principal reason for the lack of successful prosecutions lies in the difficulty or proving intention on the part of the offender. The Bill addresses this problem by creating a new Reverse Onus regulatory offence. Once the physical elements of the offence have been proven, the burden of proof will lie on the accused to show that he or she had an honest and reasonable belief that such services were not being provided. The Bill also ensures that police can seek a declaration from the Magistrates Court that premises are an illegal brothel on the same basis as other relevant authorities, such as municipal councils. Clause 12 inserts new sections 46D and 46E. New section 46D deals with the power of the Authority to put questions to or require information from a prostitution services provider relating to the business of the licensee. It is an offence to refuse to comply with such a request without reasonable excuse. 46E deals with the rule against self-incrimination, 46E(2) provides: Before a licensee is required by the Authority to answer a question the Authority must inform the licensee that if they claim, before answering the question that the answer may tend to incriminate then the answer is not admissible in evidence in any criminal proceedings, other than in proceedings in respect of the falsity of the answer. Section 46E(3) provides: If the licensee claims, before answering a question, that the answer might tend to incriminate the licensee, the answer is not admissible in evidence in any criminal proceedings, other than in proceedings in respect of the falsity of the answer. Clause 13 repeals old sections 47(1), (3) and (3A) and substitutes new sections 47(1) and (2) and spells out the circumstances where a licence will be automatically cancelled for example a conviction on a drug offence in or outside Victoria, a Schedule 3 offence including a visa or illegal immigrant offence, insolvency or a conviction for an indictable crime punishable by imprisonment for 12 months or more. Clause 18 substitutes a new section 53 dealing with the automatic cancellation of approved manager status under Division 5 of Part 3. The offences for automatic cancellation are the same as in clause 13 above. Clause 22 inserts a new Division 8A into Part 3 dealing with standardised inspectors powers. The new Division consists of new sections 61A to 61Z and reproduces almost identical inspectorial powers found in the Fair Trading Act 1999. The Committee reported on these provisions in Alert Digest No. 2 of 1999 at pages 5 to 15. The Committee also looked at inspectors powers in the Fair Trading (Inspectors Powers and Other Amendments) Bill reported in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1999 at pages 4 to 8. New section 61L provides for the issue of search warrants pursuant to the forms and procedures prescribed under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. New section 61T requires an occupier to assist inspectors by giving information either orally or in writing or to produce documents to the inspector and to give reasonable assistance to the inspector. 61U makes it an offence to refuse or fail to comply with any of the provisions in the new Division. New section 61V deals with the rule against self-incrimination. 61V(3) provides that: If the person claims, before answering a question, that the answer might tend to incriminate them, the answer is not admissible in evidence in any criminal proceedings, other than in proceedings in respect of the falsity of the answer. New section 61X applies certain provisions found in the Fair Trading Act 1999 for the purposes of the Act. They are: section 120 (inspectors to be permitted to enter premises open to the public and are permitted to purchase anything on such premises at such a time and at such a price at which it is available to the public to purchase); section 135 (offence to hinder or obstruct inspector); section 136 (offence to impersonate an inspector); section 137 (inspectors to report exercise of powers of entry to Director); section 138 (Director to keep register of such reports); and section 139 (Director to investigate complaints). Clause 28 substitutes a new section 80(1)(a) and section 84(1)(a) and inserts a new section 80(3B) and ensures that in applying to the Magistrates Court for a declaration that the premises are a proscribed brothel, an authorised member of the police force is not required to satisfy the court as to the state of mind of the person carrying on business as a prostitution provider at the premises. Clause 32 inserts a new section 39 into the Summary Offences Act 1966 allowing for regulations to be made by the Governor-in-Council relating to advertising of live sexually explicit entertainment including the imposition of a penalty of up to 20 penalty units ($2,000).
Clause 33 inserts a new section 157(10A) of the Confiscation Act 1997 to ensure the new strict liability unlicensed business offence in section 22(1A) is a forfeiture offence for the purpose of that Act The Committee makes no further comment. Rail Corporations and Transport Acts (Amendment) Bill 14.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Robin Cooper MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 14.2 The Bill amends the Rail Corporation Act 1996, Transport Act 1983, Public Transport Competition Act 1995 and certain other Acts. The Bill establishes the Spencer Street Station Authority. 14.3 Clause 2 Parts 1, 4, 5 and 6 and section 48 commence on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 July 2000. Rail Corporation Act 1996 Clauses 6 and 7 respectively delineate in Schedule 2 and establish the Spencer Street Station Authority (the Authority). New section 18ZK and 18ZL provides that certain land is divested from other public statutory bodies and may be vested in the new Authority. Transport Act 1983 Clause 23 amends section 219 to clarify powers of arrest of suspected offenders by employees in the Department employed under the Public Sector Management and Employment Act 1998. Clause 24 substitutes new sub-sections 220(1), (1A), (1B) and (1C) for section 220(1) and extends the power to remove offenders from certain vehicles and premises to authorised persons employed or engaged by bus companies and relevant employees of the Department (if they believe on reasonable grounds that the person is committing an offence) and to expand the application of the provision to the vehicles of bus companies. Clause 27 inserts new sections 221A to 221S and deals with the authorisation of persons for the purposes of enforcement. 221M confers a right of review by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal in respect of certain decisions by the Secretary relating to authorisations under relevant provisions. Clause 34 new section 251A gives passenger transport companies powers with respect to disposal of lost property, and new section 251B exempts noise emanating from rolling stock and deems noise not to be a nuisance for the purposes of the Environment Protection Act 1970, the Local Government Act 1989 and the regulations made under those Acts. Public Transport Competition Act 1995 (the Act) 14.4 Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968) Clause 36 inserts a new section 36(1A) into the Act providing that: No compensation is payable to any person in respect of or as a consequence of any decision of the Director under this Act-
Clause 37 declares that it is the intention of section 36(1A) as inserted by amended by clause 36 (above) to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: Proposed new section 36(1A) of the Public Transport Competition Act is intended to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 to the extent necessary to prevent the Supreme Court from awarding compensation in relation to an act described in that section. The proposed new section relates to actions taken by the Director of Public Transport in relation to bus contracts. It prevents claims for compensation when the Director is acting in course of his duties under the Public Transport Competition Act relating to bus contracts. The usual duration of bus contracts is 10 years, and the legislative protection in the Act requiring lengthy notice to operators to vary, suspend or cancel contracts together with the process of contract negotiation, are more than adequate to protect the interests of bus companies and provide a fair mechanism for implementing necessary contractual change. Further, the provisions of new section 36(1A) as proposed to be inserted by clause 36 of the Bill will ensure finality in bus contract process so that continued service to the public can be assured.
Rail Corporation (Amendment) Act 1997. Clause 41 amends section 37 of the Act which itself inserts a new section 228HA into the Transport Act 1983 to enable the Secretary to audit certain books and records of accredited companies to ensure compliance with conditions of accreditation and also permits regulations to be made requiring such companies to keep books and records for that purpose. Rail Corporations (Further Amendment) Act 1998. Clause 43 amends sections 31, 32 and 36(1) of the Act and inserts new sections 211(1), 218B(2A), 219AA and 229(1AA) into the Transport Act 1983. The effect of the amendments is to allow authorised persons employed or engaged by bus companies to exercise powers to take names and addresses of, and to detain certain offenders and to bring proceedings for ticket offences. Melbourne City Link Act 1995. Clause 48 amends section 73 of the Act to ensure that further infringement notices or charges in respect of toll evasion may be issued where previous notices or charges have been withdrawn, despite the general limit of one notice or charge per vehicle per day. The Committee makes no further comment. State Taxation Acts (Amendment) Bill 15.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 5 May 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 6 May 1999. 15.2 The Bill amends a number of State taxation and revenue Acts to give effect to a budget initiative; provide certain exemptions; protect State revenue and increase the efficiency of tax administration. 15.3 Clause 2 provides that: (1) This Act (except sections 5, 6, 18, 19, 21, 23 and 25) comes into operation on the day on which it receives Royal Assent. (2) Section 19 is deemed to have come into operation on 1 July 1998. (3) Sections 5, 6, 21, 23 and 25 come into operation on 1 July 1999. (4) Section 18 comes into operation on the day on which section 10 of the Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Act 1999 comes into operation. Clause 3 makes amendments to section 3(1) of the Debits Tax Act 1990 to ensure that all financial institutions which issue cheques will pay debits tax. Recent amendments to Commonwealth legislation expanded the range of financial institutions which could issue cheques which were previously only issued by "banks". The amendment puts all financial institutions and banks on an equal footing with regard to this tax. Clause 9 amends section 7 of the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 by inserting a new section 7(1)(h) and lowers the rate of pay-roll tax after the month of June 1999 to 5.75% from the existing 6%. Clause 18 inserts a new subdivision (18) of Division 3 of Part 2 of the Stamps Act 1958. The amendments are necessary as a result of the transfer of supervisory responsibilities from the States to the Commonwealth under the Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Bill and the Financial Sector (Transfers of Business) Act 1999 (Cth). Clause 2(4) provides that the provisions come into operation on the day on which section 10 of the Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Act 1999 comes into operation.
Clause 19 inserts section 137T into the Stamps Act 1958 which exempts from duty certain instruments relating to managed investment schemes, as specified in the section. Clause 2 provides the provision is deemed to have commenced from 1 July 1998.
The Committee makes no further comment. Ministerial Correspondence Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Bill 16.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 April 1999 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 April 1999. 16.2 The Committee considered the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1999 at page 8. The Committee expressed its concern in respect to the following matters and sought further clarification from the Minister. 1. Clause 34 provides that the Minister may enter into a transfer agreement connected with the transfer of the Victorian Financial Institutions Commissions (VicFic) staff to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). The transfer agreement is said to have effect according to its terms. The Committee carefully considered clauses 34 to 36 of the Bill concerning the transfer of the staff of VicFic. From the provision in the Bill it is not apparent to the Committee whether transferred staff will be entitled to terms and conditions of employment not less favourable than existing terms and conditions applying immediately prior to their transfer. Nor is it apparent to the Committee whether all staff of VicFic will be transferred to APRA. 2. Clause 52 provides that on the transfer date the Australian Financial Institutions Appeals Tribunal cease to exist and all applications made to it that have not been decided are deemed to be withdrawn. The Committee has concerns in respect to the deeming provisions as they purport to apply to applications made to the Tribunal for review which are not decided at the time the Tribunal ceases to exist. The Committee will write to the Minister to ascertain whether an alternative appeal procedure exists which will apply to such applications. 16.3 Ministers response Thank you for your letter dated 4 May 1999. I respond to your concerns as follows: Clause 34 As the Explanatory Memorandum for this Bill notes, the Bill complements the Commonwealth Financial Sector Reform (Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill (No 1) 1999 ("Commonwealth Bill"), and both this Bill and the Commonwealth Bill reflect an inter-governmental agreement between the Commonwealth and State/Territory Governments. The terms and conditions under which staff will transfer from the State regulators to the Commonwealth regulators are set out in that agreement. The effect of the agreement is that all of the staff of the State Supervisory Authorities (in Victoria this is the Victorian Financial Institutions Commission ("VicFIC"), will be transferred to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ("APRA") or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC"), on terms and conditions no less favourable than their current terms and conditions. In relation to transfers to APRA, Division 2 of Part 1 of Schedule 8 of the Commonwealth Bill empowers the Commonwealth Treasurer to enter into an agreement with State/Territory Ministers that provides for matters connected with the transfer of staff from a State Supervisory Authority to APRA. It also provides that the terms and conditions relating to remuneration must be not less favourable that those applied to the person immediately before the date agreed for the staff transfer ("agreed date"), and the person is entitled to retain, as an APRA employee, all the benefits that had accrued to the person in respect of his/her length of service up to the agreed date, as if those benefits had accrued in respect of the persons position as an APRA employee. The persons service as an APRA employee is taken for all purposes to have been continuous with the persons service, immediately before the agreed date, as a State/Territory employee. I attach a copy of those provisions for your information. Clause 34 of the Bill complements this by empowering me, as the State Minister, to enter into such an agreement. The Commonwealth Government has given an undertaking that, for a transitional period up to 30 June 2000, APRA will retain a regional office in the State capital cities, retaining in those offices staff previously engaged in those locations by the State Supervisory Authorities. After the transition period APRA will only be required to provide offices and staff numbers in the major capital cities provided that it is consistent with provision of effective and flexible prudential regulation that is also cost effective and responsive to industry developments and needs. This effectively means that staff who have not been successful in obtaining ongoing positions by 30 June 2000 will be redundant. However, their terms of redundancy will be the same as their current terms offered by VicFIC. Separate arrangements will be required for staff who transfer to ASIC. Those staff will be appointed under the Public Service Act 1922 of the Commonwealth, and arrangements for their appointment will proceed under that Act. Those arrangements will reflect the inter-governmental agreement. Clauses 35 and 36 of the Bill recognise and take account of this. Clause 52 Following the abolition of the Australian Financial Institutions Appeals Tribunal any appeals which are on foot will be deemed to be withdrawn. This will allow the relevant Commonwealth regulator which takes on responsibility for that area of decision making to reconsider the decision in question and either affirm it, or set it aside. If the decision is affirmed, the parties may proceed to appeal the decision through Commonwealth appeal mechanisms. New Tax System Price Exploitation Code (Victoria) Bill 17.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 April 1999 by the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 April 1999. 17.2 The Committee considered the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1999 at page 20 and expressed concern in respect to the expiry of the legislation and the method by which the Act could be amended or modified. The Committee made the following comments and sought further advice from the Premier: 1. The Committee notes the particular need for a commencement provision linked to the commencement of certain Commonwealth enactments. In the special circumstances of the Bill the Committee does not regard the commencement provision as objectionable. The Committee further notes the Premiers comments in the Second Reading Speech that the prohibition on price exploitation introduced by the Bill is limited to two years from the introduction of the new tax system, and that after that period the prohibition ceases to operate. The Committee notes that no expiry clause or sun-setting provision is provided in the Bill or referred to in the Second Reading Speech. The Committee will therefore seek the Premiers advice as to the mechanism by which it is proposed that the Act will be repealed. 2. Clause 6 deals with future modifications of the Code by Commonwealth legislation as they may apply to Victoria. There is to be a two month gap between the modification of the text by the Commonwealth Act or Regulation, and its application to Victoria pursuant to clause 5. The two month gap may be shortened by Order in Council. Alternatively the Order in Council may provide that a modification will not apply in Victoria. The Committee notes that the Bill forms part of a National Scheme of Legislation agreed to by the respective governments of the States, Territories and the Commonwealth. The Committee is mindful that many aspects of such legislation have been identified by this Committee and scrutiny committees of other jurisdictions as undermining the institution of Parliament. The Committee is concerned that future modifications to the legislation will apply as a law of Victoria by Order in Council, effectively by-passing the normal processes of Parliamentary scrutiny and scrutiny by the Committee. The Committee is concerned that the modification provision may be regarded as an inappropriate delegation of legislative power to the Executive. The Committee will write to the Minister expressing its concerns. The Committee refers to Parliament for its consideration the question of whether the Bill has sufficient regard to the institution of Parliament. 17.3 Ministers response Thank you for your letter of 4 May 1999 with regard to the New Tax System Price Exploitation Code (Victoria) Bill. I note the issues raised in your letter on behalf of the Committee and I am pleased to advise as follows. Expiry of the proposed Victorian legislation You have noted that the prohibition on price exploitation will be limited to two years from the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") and you have sought advice on the mechanism by which it is proposed to repeal the legislation. The limited application of the prohibition on price exploitation will be achieved by s.75AU of the New Tax System Price Exploitation Code ("the Code"). This provision will be inserted into the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ("TPA") by proposed Commonwealth legislation currently before the Senate. A similar version of this provision, referring to "persons" rather than "corporations", will be inserted into the Schedule to the TPA and adopted as a law of Victoria. Proposed s.75AU(2)(a) provides that one of the elements of price exploitation is that a person must engage in a "regulated supply". The definition of a "regulated supply" in proposed s.75AT includes a requirement that the supply occur during the "New Tax System transition period". The "New Tax System transition period" is, in turn, defined in s.75AT as the period commencing on 1 July 1999 and finishing two years after the implementation of the GST. The effect of this is that a supply of a product that occurs more than two years after the introduction of a GST will not be a supply that is caught by the prohibition on price exploitation contained in s.75AU of the Code. That said, there will still be a need for this legislation to remain in force for a period extending beyond the New Tax System transition period. The Code not only prohibits price exploitation, but also deals with gathering information, enforcement of the Code, remedies that are available and penalties that may be imposed. The provisions dealing with these matters may need to continue to apply in Victoria beyond the two year transition period. For example, the ACCC might bring proceedings under the Code against a person for price exploitation during the two year period. However, the legal proceedings arising out of this alleged breach of the Code may continue beyond the end of this period. The Code must remain in force in Victoria to allow for the final determination of matters arising under the Code during the New Tax System transition period. Obviously, the length of this additional period cannot be accurately predicted in advance. It is therefore extremely difficult to fix a sunset date for the legislation at this time. However, once it is clear that the application of the Code under Victorian law is no longer required, the appropriate mechanism for the sunsetting of the Code will be by repeal of the Victorian legislation. Future modifications to the Code text You have raised concerns that clause 6 will allow future modifications to the Code text, by the Commonwealth, to be applied as laws of Victoria by Order in Council, and that this may be an inappropriate delegation of legislative power. The Committees view that clause 6 allows for the application of modifications by Order in Council is, with respect, inaccurate. Future modifications to the Code will apply automatically as laws of Victoria by virtue of clause 5 of the Bill, which provides that: "(1) The New Tax System Price Exploitation Code text, as in force for the time being, applies as a law of Victoria. (2) This section has effect subject to section 6." Clause 6 is a mechanism that allows the Governor-in-Council to bring forward the date upon which a modification to the Code takes effect (in the absence of an Order in Council, the modification will take effect after two months), or to exclude the application of a modification altogether. The principal reason for the automatic adoption of modifications to the Code text is that the proposed Commonwealth, State and Territory legislation is designed to establish a national scheme for the administration and enforcement of the Codes of the various jurisdictions as if they were a single law of the Commonwealth. This necessarily requires that the text of the various Codes be, as far as possible, consistent with one another. It should be noted that where the Code text is modified by an amendment to the TPA or regulations made under that Act, the modifications will be subject to the relevant scrutiny procedures of the Commonwealth Parliament. Automatic adoption of modifications is preferred to a scheme that would require States and Territories to expressly adopt modifications. The text of the Code is more than just the Schedule version of Part VB of the TPA. Other provisions of the TPA, including those relating to investigation and enforcement, as well as the Guidelines issued by the ACCC under proposed s.75AV, will also form part of the Code text that is applied as a law of Victoria. These various instruments may be subject to amendment on an on-going basis. There is a very real danger that, if such modifications were not adopted automatically as part of the Code, the Codes applying in each jurisdiction could begin to diverge if one or more jurisdictions did not take the necessary action to adopt the modifications. This would undermine the objective of establishing a single national Code relating to price exploitation in the transition to the New Tax System. I do not believe that clause 6 is an inappropriate delegation of legislative power. This clause exists to address the unlikely situation in which a modification to the text of the Code is, for whatever reason, unacceptable to Victoria, or where there is an urgent need to bring the application of a modification forward. It is not expected that the mechanism in clause 6 will need to be exercised often, if at all, during the life of the Code. I note that an almost identical provision exists in the Competition Policy Reform (Victoria) Act 1995. This provision has not been utilised since the commencement of the Competition Code of Victoria in July 1996. 18.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 24 March 1999 by the Honourable Pat McNamara MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 25 March 1999. 18.2 The Committee considered the Bill in Alert Digest No. 2 of 1999 at page 34 and expressed concern in respect to the following matter. The Committee wrote to the Minister for further clarification. Clause 6 clarifies water rights in the Mildura irrigation area. The clause amends various provisions in Schedule 6 of the Water Act 1989, in particular the insertion of new clause 4A to 4F in that Schedule. New clause 4A extinguishes any easements or other interests securing a water right in the area conferred by an earlier indenture or earlier legislation, insofar as any still exist. The Committee notes that the amendments have the effect of extinguishing existing easements or other interests securing existing irrigation water rights. On the material before it the Committee is unable to say whether any person will be materially disadvantaged by the extinguishment of these rights and if so, whether the new legislative regime provides for an avenue for fair and adequate compensation for the loss of those rights. 18.3 Ministers response In your letter of 13 April you set out some queries the Committee had about the above Bill. No one will be materially disadvantaged by the Bill. Our legal advice is that rights fixed to land under the 1887 Chaffeys indenture were swept away by the Water Act 1989. Even if they still exist, they are worth significantly less than the rights we are now proposing to recognise. The indenture required the Chaffeys to secure a "sufficient water right" to land sold to irrigators, and this was to run with the land as a perpetual easement. However, the volume of this right was limited in the indenture itself, and from 1895 by statute. In the indenture the volume was effectively limited to less than 5 megalitres a hectare at farm. Moreover, a relatively high proportion of this water was available in winter/spring, not summer/autumn (this was prior to dams on the River Murray). For many decades (currently under Schedule 6 of the Water Act 1989) the rights have been defined as worth 6.113 megalitres a hectare, or such greater amount that is determined by Governor-in-Council. No such greater amount has been determined. The Bill proposes water right of 9.144 megalitres a hectare on irrigated land in the district of the First Mildura Irrigation Trust (FMIT). It allows even greater amounts where high-use crops like citrus have been grown, and up to this amount on land not irrigated but rated. All this is comparable to the rights being recognised on land in neighbouring districts. The proposal is now accepted by the FMIT board, which has recently applied for a bulk entitlement accordingly. These water sharing arrangements took over two years to negotiate through the Murray Water Entitlement Committee which involved all of the water authorities on the River Murray and the key stakeholder groups. The Bill applies to three other categories of land: 1. Land in FMITs district which is not rated. In times past the owner or occupier of any of this land could claim water rights if it was ever supplied by FMIT. But there are no existing rights, and thus no material disadvantage in discontinuing the past arrangement. 2. Land held by about ten private pumpers next to FMITs district. These people have rights under Schedule 6 of the Water Act 1989 to the water they would have received under the indenture. Theses rights are to be replaced by ordinary licences, covering their current irrigation requirements, so no issue of compensation arises. 3. Other land outside FMITs district. The Chaffeys were originally allowed to develop an area ten times the size of FMITs district. Any latent rights that might have somehow survived in this wider area are to be extinguished, but again there will not be any material disadvantage. Year 2000 Information Disclosure Bill 19.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 24 March 1999 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 25 March 1999. 19.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 2 of 1999 at page 38. On 13 April the Committee wrote to the Minister expressing concern in respect to the commencement provision in the Bill. The Committee wrote to the Minister as follows: The Committee notes the retrospective application of the Act to 27 February 1999. The Committee believes that the commencement of the Act is intended to coincide with the commencement of the counterpart Commonwealth enactment, however since the Second Reading Speech and the Explanatory Memorandum are silent on the issue as to the reason why the Act is deemed to have commenced on 27 February 1999 the Committee is unable to comment whether the retrospective operation of the Act is justified or otherwise. 19.3 Ministers response Your letter dated 13 April 1999 sent to the Treasurer has been referred to me for response. The Committee is correct in its understanding of the requirement for the retrospective operation of the Year 2000 Information Disclosure Bill. The Bill was introduced to "mirror" the provisions of the Commonwealth Year 2000 Information Disclosure Act 1999, which provides legal indemnity for the making of certain Year 2000 statements. By agreement between the Commonwealth, States and Territories, the Year 2000 Information Disclosure Act 1999 was made retrospective to its introduction into the Federal Parliament on 26 February 1999. This decision was made in recognition of the urgent need for the free exchange of Year 2000 readiness information between customers and suppliers that rely upon the uninterrupted operation of each others systems. The reason for the retrospective operation of the States Bill is to extend the same level of legal indemnity for Year 2000 statements to those organisations within Victoria not directly covered by the Commonwealth legislation. 20.1
Police Regulation and Firearms (Amendment) Bill 21.1
Year 2000 Information Disclosure Bill 22.1
Monday, 24 May 1999
|