|
|
|
|
Alert Digest No. 8
of 1998 CHATTEL SECURITIES (AMENDMENT) BILL 1.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 1.2 The Bill amends the Chattel Securities Act 1987 (the Act) as a consequence of the establishment of the National Vehicle Security Enquiry Register and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Chattel Securities Act 1987 provides a system for the registration of security interests in goods - principally motor vehicles - so that prospective purchasers can check whether a vehicle is subject to a financial encumbrance.
All vehicle security data bases in mainland Australia have now been linked and prospective purchases can ascertain whether a vehicle registered in any mainland Australian State is subject to a financial encumbrance.
The Bill makes provision for the inclusion of unregistered but registrable motor vehicles and trailers, and agricultural machinery and implements as goods which are registrable goods under the Chattel Securities Act. This means that a person who holds a security interest in these goods may register their interest on the vehicles security register.
Victoria will have fulfilled its commitment to the establishment of a National Vehicle Security Enquiry Register, which will substantially reduce the risk of financial loss for financiers and purchasers of second-hand vehicles." 1.3 Clause 2 Parts 1 and 2 commence on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 July 1999. Clause 4 makes amendments consequent upon the establishment of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Clause 5 inserts into section 3 of the Act new or amended definitions including new definitions for agricultural implement, agricultural machine and repairers lien. Clause 7 inserts a new section 7(1A) which provides that if as a result of an administrative or systems error, a registered security interest is not disclosed on a certificate and the purchaser purchases the goods for value in good faith and without notice, the security interest is extinguished. (the security holder may apply for compensation under section 25(1B)). Secondly, it provides for the extinguishment on purchase of goods of a security interest that was registered after a search certificate was issued to the purchaser (provided that the certificate was issued on the day of the purchase or the preceding day). The provision provides the purchaser with a period of time to complete the purchase with certainty that the goods are not encumbered. Clause 9 inserts a new section 10(4) which provides that a repairers lien on goods, whether or not registered under Part 3, ranks in priority to any registered security interest in respect to those goods. Clause 10 substitutes new definitions for motor vehicles and trailers in section 13(1) of the Act to permit motor vehicles and trailers which are unregistered but eligible for registration to be included as registered goods and adds a new category of registrable goods being agricultural machines and agricultural implements. Clause 11 inserts a new section 25(1B) permitting a person who suffers loss or damage because a security interest that was registered before a search certificate was issued is not disclosed on the certificate and therefore is extinguished under section 7(1A) to apply to the Tribunal for compensation. The Committee makes no further comment. CRIMES, CONFISCATION AND EVIDENCE ACTS (AMENDMENT) BILL 2.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 28 October 1998 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 29 October 1998. 2.2 Part 2 of the Bill amends the Crimes Act 1958 concerning the provision of forensic reports; Part 3 of the Bill amends the Confiscation Act 1997 and Part 4 amends the Evidence Act 1958. 2.3 Clause 2 provides that Parts 1 and 2 commence operation on Royal Assent. Part 3 is deemed to have come into operation on 1 July 1998. Part 4 is deemed to have come into operation on 20 October 1998. Part 2 - Amendments to the Crimes Act 1958 (the Act) Clause 3 amends sections 464ZD and 464ZE of the Crimes Act 1958 in respect to the provision of forensic reports. The effect of the amendment is that the prosecution must provide, by registered post, the person or his or her legal practitioner with a copy of every forensic report as soon as practicable. The existing provision makes it mandatory to provide such a forensic report within 7 days after receipt by the prosecution of the report. However, clause 3 also amends section 464ZE(1) to provide that a failure to provide a copy of every forensic report to the person within 7 days of its receipt by the prosecution will result in evidence obtained by the forensic procedure being inadmissible subject to the exceptions provided for in 464ZE(2) and (2A). The exceptions permit a court to exercise discretion by determining whether there are circumstances that justify the reception of the evidence. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "In 1997, the Government broadened the circumstances in which DNA samples could be taken from people by court order or, with certain safeguards, by police. Those provisions placed very restrictive time limits on police to provide forensic reports to people from whom forensic samples have been taken. The time limits have proved to be too onerous and are inappropriate in some circumstances. The Amendment requires forensic reports to be provided "as soon as practicable" after the sample is taken from the person. Section 464ZE of the Crimes Act 1958 has also been amended to ensure that if a forensic report is not provided to the person from whom the sample was taken within an appropriate time frame, the court will determine whether the evidence should be admitted into evidence. This strikes an appropriate balance between the rights of those from whom forensic samples have been obtained and the rights of the community to obtain and use valuable evidence against those accused or convicted of serious crimes." Clause 4 inserts a new section 590 in the Act (a transitional provision) providing that the amendments made to the Act by the Bill apply only to forensic procedures conducted after the commencement of section 3 (above). Part 3 - Amendments to the Confiscation Act 1997 (the Act) Clause 5 amends section 157 of the Act and inserts a transitional provision relating to the continued application of the now repealed Crimes (Confiscation of Profits) Acts 1986 in respect to serious offences (within the meaning of that Act) for which a criminal proceedings was begun prior to the commencement of Part 2 of the Confiscation Act 1997 (being 1 July 1998), regardless of whether the defendant was convicted before or after that commencement. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The transitional provisions of the Confiscation Act 1997 have been amended to clarify the manner in which they operate. The amending provisions expressly provide that all applications, orders and powers under the Crimes (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1986 continue to apply and may be exercised in relation to criminal proceedings commenced before 1 July 1998, regardless of whether the defendant was convicted before or after 1 July 1998. The amendments expressly provide that any orders made pursuant to the Crime (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1986 have been validly made. The Confiscation Act 1997 will continue to apply in relation to criminal proceedings commenced after 1 July 1998." The Committee notes the amendments to Part 3 are deemed to have come into operation on 1 July 1998. The Committee also notes the comments of the Minister in the Second Reading Speech and that the amendments do not affect the rights of the parties that were the subject of the proceedings known as Martin v Cooper and Martin heard in the Magistrates Court at Melbourne and determined on 7 October 1998. The Committee believes that in the circumstances the retrospective operation of the amendments are justified. Part 4 - Amendments to the Evidence Act 1958 (the Act) Clause 6 inserts new sections 19A to 19E into Division 5 of Part 1 of the Act (Boards Appointed and Commissions Issued by the Governor in Council). The provisions are deemed to have come into operation on 20 October 1998. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "On 20 October 1998, the Longford Commission was established to enquire into the explosion at the ESSO Longford Gas Processing Plant and into the consequential major disruption to Victorias natural gas supply. The Commission is expected to report its findings in the first half of 1999. To ensure that the Commission is able to properly fulfil its functions, it is vital that the Commission be able to obtain access to all necessary documents and information. The bill supplements the powers currently conferred on commissions of enquiry by inserting new sections 19A to 19E into the Evidence Act 1958. Their effect will be to ensure that valuable time and resources are not wasted on associated litigation or technical legal disputes about whether various vital evidence should be produced to a commission. At the same time, the amendments will provide appropriate safeguards for the persons who are providing that evidence. Section 19D(2) confers a discretion on the commissioners to restrict access to the hearing in circumstances where legal professional privilege is claimed and has been included to complement the power to close hearings under section 19B. The amendments will assist the Longford Commission in fulfilling its crucial role in restoring confidence in the safety and reliability of Victorias natural gas supply, ensuring that Victoria continues to be a safe and fair State in which to live and do business." New section 19A(1) makes in plain that in relation to commissions a reference to a "document" includes a reference to a thing. 19A(2)(a) provides that notwithstanding any contrary provision in any Act or law, Division 5 of Part 1 applies to coroners, the WorkCover Authority, any other public statutory authority or a member of the board of management of such an authority, the Director of Public Prosecutions, a member of the police force or the holder of an office established by or under an Act. Further new section 19A(2)(b) provides that the Division applies to any information, document or thing obtained by or in the possession of such a person (in (a) above) and, (c) the disclosure or production to the Commission of any such information, document or thing. New section 19B allows the presiding commissioner to exclude the public from a hearing, where this will facilitate the conduct of the inquiry or is in the public interest. The Commissioner may also prohibit publication of reports of proceedings or information gained from the hearing. Breach of such an order attracts a penalty of $3,000 or 3 months imprisonment. New section 19C provides that persons providing evidence to a commissioner may not refuse to do so on grounds of the privilege against self-incrimination. However, such evidence will not be admissible against the person in any criminal or civil proceedings other than for perjury or giving false information. New section 19D provides that persons are not excused from providing evidence to a commissioner on the grounds of legal professional privilege. However, if a person does refuse to provide the evidence on that basis, the commissioner may require the provision of the evidence at a closed hearing. New section 19E confers powers on the commissioners of a commission to enter and inspect any place and to take possession of documents and things located there and to copy documents. The commissioner may also authorise (subject to time limits) a member of the police force to carry out these functions. A commissioner may release any document or thing to persons and may require such persons to give an undertaking to comply with any reasonable conditions of release. Penalty for breach $1000. The Committee makes no further comment. ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY ACTS (AMENDMENT) BILL 3.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jan Wade MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 3.2 The principal purposes of the Bill are to amend the cross-ownership rules contained in the Electricity Industry Act 1993, to facilitate the development of efficient investment in generation capacity in Victoria and to amend the Electricity Safety Act 1998 to improve its operation. The Bill also repeals certain provisions in the State Electricity Commission Act 1958. 3.3 Clause 2 Parts 1, 2 and 4 come into operation on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than by 31 December 1999. Part 2 makes amendments to the Electricity Industry Act 1993 Part 3 Amendments to the Electricity Safety Act 1998 Clause 12 removes the words in italics in section 46(3) as follows: "The owner of an electric line installed in contravention of this section must not use that electric line" and inserts the following words in their place, must ensure that the electric line is not at any time connected to a supply network. Clause 13 amends section 70(2)(a) to provide that refusal by the Officer of the Chief Electrical Inspector to supply a certificate of electrical safety form to an appropriate person is an allowable basis for an appeal to the Electrical Appeals Board (the Board). It also inserts a new section 70(7) providing that no appeal lies against the Board against a decision of an accepted electricity safety manager under Parts 3 and 4. Clause 22 inserts a new Part 11A establishing a regime of infringement notices for certain offences against the Act and the regulations. The Committee makes no further comment. GAMING ACTS (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL 4.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Tom Reynolds with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 4.2 The Bill amends a number of Acts relating to the gaming industry in Victoria. They are:
4.3 Clause 2 Section 36 comes into operation on 1 June 1999. Sections 29, 30, 31 and 32 come into operation on 1 March 1999. The remaining provisions commence operation on Royal Assent. Clause 9 inserts a new Schedule 6 into the Casino (Management Agreement) Act 1993 setting out the Fifth Deed of Variation to the management agreement between the State and Crown Casino for the Melbourne Casino Project. The Deed extends the completion date for the Lyric Theatre and the Southern Tower of the Hotel for four years to 30 November 2003 but with the obligations to pay liquidated damages for failure to complete the project beyond that date remaining unchanged. Clause 26 inserts a new section 136B into the Gaming Machine Control Act 1991 to provide a penalty for late payment of all electronic gaming machine taxes and levies. The amendment provides for interest at 20 percent per annum to be payable on unpaid gaming taxes and levies. Clauses 28 to 39 make amends to the Gaming No. 2 Act 1997. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Amendments made to the Gaming No. 2 Act continue the Governments reforms in the area of gaming carried out for the benefit of community and charitable organisations, as well as in the area of trade promotions. In particular, the following amendments strengthen the enforcement provisions of the Act to ensure that the proceeds of activities carried out for charitable and community organisations are made available to those organisations:
The Act is also amended to allow for a trade promotion lottery permit and a bingo centre operators licence to be issued to a "legal person", with a natural person as nominee. Currently this permit and licence is held by an individual only. If that person ceases involvement with an organisation or dies, it is desirable that the permit continues, rather that the organisation being required to apply for a new permit or licence. There will, of course, be probity checking of any new nominees." The Committee makes no further comment. GAS INDUSTRY ACTS (AMENDMENT) BILL 5.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Honeywood MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 5.2 The Bill amends the Gas Industry Act 1994, the Gas Pipelines Access (Victoria) Act 1998, the Gas Safety Act 1997 and certain other Acts for other purposes. 5.3 Clause 2 the commencement provisions are:
Part 2 - Amendments to the Gas Industry Act 1994 Commencement by proclamation clause Clause 2(5) provides that in Part 2 of the Bill section 13(2) comes into operation on a day to be proclaimed. Clause 2(6) of the Bill states that the remaining provisions of Part 2 come into operation on 1 December 1998. Section 13(2) of the Bill inserts new sub-sections (8) and (9) in section 48A of the Act dealing with Tariffs and Charges Orders.
Clause 2(2) provides that sections 9, 10 and 17(3) are deemed to have come into operation on 10 June 1998. Clause 9 substitutes a new section 16I of the Gas Industry Act 1994 to provide a protection from liability for VENCorp and the directors and servants of VENCorp in certain circumstances. The new section 16I provides:
Clause 10 substitutes a new section 16J of the Gas Industry Act 1994 to provide an immunity from suit for persons generally in certain circumstances and particularly for GASCOR, or gas retailers and servants and agents of, or persons acting on behalf of, or performing work or services, whether directly or indirectly, for GASCOR or a gas retailer in certain circumstances. The new section 16J provides:
Clause 17(3) substitutes a new sub-section (5) in section 62G in Part 6A Gas Supply Emergency Provisions of the Gas Industry Act 1994 to provide that "The Minister may at any time by direction under this section amend or revoke a direction, prohibition or requisition". The current 62G(5) provides "The Minister may at any time revoke a direction, prohibition or requisition."
Clause 13(1) inserts a new sub-section (7) after section 48A(6) of the Act and provides "The first Order made under this section has effect from 11 December 1997." Section 48A is contained in Part 4A, Division 1. The Part is headed Regulation of Gas Industry and the Division headed Regulation of Tariffs and Charges.
Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968). Clause 21 provides that at the end of section 101B of the Act insert new sub-section (2). (2) It is the intention of sections 16I, 16J and 62L to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. Whilst sections 16I and 16J are new provisions (as set out above), whereas section 62L is an existing provision inserted into the Act by s.39 of No. 31/1995. Section 62L (Immunity from suit) is in Part 6A - Gas Supply Emergency Provisions and provides: "A person acting in the execution of this Part or any proclamation, direction or prohibition or requisition under this Part is not liable to any action, claim or demand on account of any damage, loss or injury sustained or alleged to be sustained because of the operation of this Part or of anything done or purporting to be done under this Part or any proclamation, direction, prohibition or requisition under this Part." The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill involves two broad classes of amendment to the GIA: first, a series of amendments to the regulatory regime for the elements of the Victorian gas industry undergoing reform designed to create a competitive market in gas for the benefit of all Victorians and, second, provisions designed to ensure the effective operation of powers conferred to protect security of the gas system. The Bill includes the following:
Amendments to make these immunities effective were foreshadowed in a news release immediately following the "icing" incident at the Longford processing plant in June this year and were restated following the explosion there on 25 September 1998. These provisions do not need exempt VENCorp and industry participants from liability generally. They are strictly limited to actions intended to protect system security. The provisions clarify the operation of the immunities:
The Bill inserts into the Principal Act a provision stating that the intention of sections 16I, 16J and 62L of the Principal Act is to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. It is the intention of that provision to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Principal Act provisions mentioned are those conferring immunity from suit in respect of directions given by VENCorp or in an emergency. I wish to make a statement under section 85 of the Constitution Act of the reasons why section 85 of the Constitution Act is to be altered or varied in this respect. In so far as it might be argued that the provisions affect the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the new provision is being included in the Bill. This is a matter of abundant caution. The immunity from suit provisions do not purport to oust the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in relation to the question of liability arising from the exercise of the directions powers (or for following directions). Rather, the substantive law to be applied by the Supreme Court is stated clearly in the immunity provisions. It is pointed out that the immunity is not absolute and depends on certain pre-conditions, such as good faith, being established. The establishment of the pre-conditions is a matter that will remain within the Courts jurisdiction."
Clause 22 is declaratory and provides A delegation by the Minister under section 62I of the Principal Act on 25 September 1998 has effect as if it referred to the gas supply emergency throughout Victoria arising from an incident at Longford which occurred on that date. Section 62I is located in Part 6A of the Act Gas Supply Emergency provisions and provides: 62I. Delegation of powers and functions by Minister The Minister may by instrument delegate to any person all or any of the Ministers powers and functions under this Part (except this power of delegation) in relation to any matter or class of matters or part of Victoria specified in the instrument of delegation.
Part 3 - Amends the Gas Pipelines Access (Victoria) 1998 Part 4 - Amends the Gas Safety Act 1997 (the Act) Clause 27 inserts a new offence, in section 79A of the Act which provides that a person must not wilfully or negligently break, injure, open or tamper with any gas installation or pipeline. Penalty $10,000. Clauses 31, 32 and 33 amend the Building Act 1993, the Office of the Regulator-General Act 1994 and the State Electricity Commission Act 1958 respectively. The Committee makes no further comment. LAND TITLES VALIDATION (AMENDMENT) BILL 6.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 27 October 1998 by the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 28 October 1998. 6.2 The Bill amends the Land Titles Validation Act 1994 to validate certain intermediate period acts* and to confirm the effect on native title of certain acts; and to amend the Pipelines Act 1967 for the purpose of the application of the Native Title Act 1993 of the Commonwealth. Note 1* Intermediate period acts refer to acts occurring between
the commencement of the operation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
on 1 January 1994 and the High Courts decision in Wik, handed down on 23 December
1996. Note 2 By way of background the Committee provides a brief history of relevant issues related to native title. (Appendix 2). The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Mr Speaker, as all the Members of this house will be aware, on Wednesday, 8 July 1998, the Senate passed the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, following the longest Senate debate in the history of the Commonwealth. The Victorian Government supported the Prime Minister in his attempts to achieve a just and fair compromise in dealing with the many very difficult issues surrounding native title in this country. Both the Native Title Act as passed in 1993 and the amendments passed by the Commonwealth Parliament in July of this year represent a national scheme for the recognition and management of native title. They reflect a national approach to native title issues which seeks to balance both indigenous and non-indigenous concerns and interests. Both the 1993 legislation and the recent amendments envisage that each State and Territory will enact legislation to adopt and complement that national scheme. Accordingly, Mr Speaker, the Bill now before the House adopts the validation and confirmation provisions of the Native Title Act as amended; that is the validation scheme for certain Acts done in the period from 1 January 1994 until 23 December 1996 and the confirmation regime for "exclusive possessions Acts" to be incorporated into the Land Titles Validation Act 1994. The Bill also incorporates amendments to the Pipelines Act 1967 to ensure it continues to conform with the now changed provisions of the Commonwealth Native Titles Act 1993. It is Victorias understanding that all jurisdictions, including NSW and Queensland, intend to legislate to adopt the validation and confirmation provisions in full and have either passed such complementary legislation or are in the process of doing so. Victoria, along with all other jurisdictions has taken the view that the responsible course is to legislate in accordance with the Commonwealth amendments. This Bill amends the Land Titles Validation Act 1994 to validate certain Acts done in the period from 1 January 1994 until 23 December 1996 (to be known as "intermediate period Acts"). The approach taken is very similar to that used to validate "past Acts" under the Keating Governments Native Title Act in 1994. Prior to the Wik decision being handed down on 23 December 1996, all governments were generally of the view that under the common law the valid grant of a lease (including the grant of a pastoral leave in pastoral lease States) extinguished native title. In a 4/3 decision, the High Court in Wik upset that orthodox legal view and held that native title is capable of co-existing on pastoral leases. This directly raised the issue of whether a range of activities undertaken on Crown land were valid. Under the Bill before the House, and in accordance with the Native Titles Act as amended, the validation provisions for "intermediate period Acts" do not extend to Acts or grants made on or in relation to land which is vacant Crown land. Importantly, for validation to apply in relation to an "intermediate period Act", there must have been the grant of a freehold estate or a lease (other than a mining lease) or a "public work" over any of the land or waters concerned. In looking at how the validation regime will operate in Victoria, it should be remembered that it is designed to operate in States and Territories where there are significant areas of Crown land held under lease. Victoria is not such a State. In Victoria, the validation provisions could only have any effect in relation to the limited areas subject to lease, land which has been freeholded in the past or where there are public works on the land. Victoria, unlike for example Queensland, does not issue large numbers of leases over vast areas. Mr Speaker, the Government does not believe that the validation provisions will have any significant operation in Victoria. However, in relation to any activities that are validated, the State Government will pay compensation if it is demonstrated that native title interests have been extinguished or affected. It should also be noted that the Commonwealth amendments provide for validation to occur pursuant to indigenous land use agreements. The Bill also provides for this outcome. The confirmation provisions will operate to confirm certain current and historic Victorian land tenures as tenures which gave exclusive possession and therefore extinguished native title. These tenures include freehold, commercial leases, exclusive agricultural leases, residential leases, community purpose leases, any other lease (other than a mining lease) which confers a right of exclusive possession, and public works. In addition to these categories there is a list set out in the Commonwealth amendments of tenures called in the Victorian amendments "scheduled interests". The Victorian Government is of the view that the tenures confirmed, including those listed as "scheduled interests", accurately reflect the common law based upon both the MABO and WIK High Court decisions and as now supported by the recent High Court decision in the FEJO case. In our view, these High Court decisions have already provided sufficient legal guidance as to the position in relation to native title claims. The types of leases set out in the schedule are quite different from those found to potentially co-exist with native title under the WIK decision. In developing the Victorian component of the Commonwealth schedule to ensure that it did accurately reflect the common law, a process of consultation occurred between State and Commonwealth officials. In evaluating these tenures, the Commonwealth had to be convinced that only those leases which clearly demonstrated that a right of exclusive possession was to be given to a leasee were included in the schedule. Only after this was done, and agreement reached, was any particular leasing provision placed in the schedule. The Government is aware that a number of indigenous Victorians have some concerns about the passage of confirmation and validation legislation. They are concerned that surviving native title may be extinguished by the passage of this bill. For the reasons I have already set out, the government does not believe that it pre-empting the common law by the introduction of this legislation, or that it is creating an unknown compensation liability for the State. To put the matter very simply, the public policy lying behind the schedule is to allow the state, native title applicants and other parties to identify those areas of Crown land where native title has been extinguished and avoid costly and unproductive litigation. It allows the focus to be on the future, to areas where some native title may continue and focus on the achievement of real and practical outcomes for the future. It is not in the interests of any member of the Victorian community - indigenous or non-indigenous - to have every tenure ever issued individually tested by the courts to determine whether it resulted in a grant of exclusive possession or not. Such a course would not result in any practical and lasting outcomes and would only divert scarce resources to unproductive ends. The Government has a responsibility to provide clear law in relation to the people of Victoria to the best of its ability in the context of the national scheme for native title passed by the Commonwealth Parliament. There is no value for either indigenous Victorians or the wider community to allow pointless and divisive litigation to proceed endlessly. Mr Speaker, for the State to simply await further court decisions before legislating, would not be a responsible approach. Here I can only point to the words of Justice Kirby in the recent FEJO decision: "In every society, rights in land which afford an enforceable entitlement to exclusive possession are basic to social peace and order as well as to economic investment and property. Any significant disturbance of such established rights is therefore, ordinarily, a matter for the legislature not the courts". For the State to refuse to legislate for confirmation will not assist the Victorian community. Rather it will create a perception of legal uncertainty as to these exclusive possession tenures when the State is unambiguously of the view that native title has been extinguished. It would be simply wrong to suggest to indigenous Victorians that the State is of the view that past exclusive possession tenure did not extinguish native title. It needs to be understood that in one instance where the confirmation regime in the Native Title Act amendments specifically overrides the common law it does so in favour of native title claimants. This is section 47B which provides that the extinguishing effect of any prior tenures over Crown land that is currently completely vacant, is to be ignored so that native title can continue to be claimed where it would not otherwise be able to be claimed.
The Victorian Government is committed to the economic development and security of Victoria for all Victorians. The debate about the Prime Ministers ten point plan has been had. The legislation to implement that plan has been passed by the Commonwealth Parliament. The Victorian Governments aim is similar to that of the Federal Government, that is to confirm the existing common law in relation to native title and to provide for clearer processes under the Native Title Act 1993 in relation to future acts and the resolution of native title issues by agreement where possible. The Commonwealth amendments attempt to strike a balance between the need to achieve certainty for non-indigenous land holders whilst ensuring that native title holders are consulted appropriately in relation to future acts, and that where possible agreements can be reached via indigenous land use agreements under the Native Title Act amendments. The Victorian Government has not sought the unilateral extinction of native title within Victoria. The Victorian Government accepts this need for laws to recognise and protect native title and accepts the High Courts decision in the MABO case. Consequently, the Government also accepts the right of a person to make an application for determination of native title. In relation to native title claims themselves, the Governments position is that it can make no admission of validity in relation to a claim unless or until native title, and the form and nature of the rights claimed, is proven to the standard required by the High Court in the MABO decision or until the Government is satisfied that it could be so proved. This position reflects the governments role as the custodian of crown land on behalf of the entire Victorian community. However, this approach does not and had not ruled out the resolution of issues by sensible agreements which advance the interests of both indigenous and non-indigenous Victorians. Here, I would point to the recent agreement between native title claimants, the State and the project developers in relation to the Horse Hair Plains Airport development. The Government of Victoria acknowledges that Aboriginal people of Victoria were the original inhabitants of the land now known as Victoria and as such feel a deep and particular relationship with the land and assert a right to speak for the land. The Government of Victoria also acknowledges that the Aboriginal peoples of Victoria are entitled to respect for their traditional customs and culture. Within the framework of the Native Title Act, Victorian legislation concerning native title future act processes generally is to be developed for passage in 1999, and the government wishes to involve indigenous Victorians in developing this legislation to put in place effective working relationships for the future. " 6.3 Clause 2 Parts 1 and 2 commence on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 August 1999. Part 2 - Amendments to the Land Titles Validation Act 1994 (the Act) Clause 5 inserts new Parts 2A, 2B and 2C in the Act. New Part 2A - Validation of intermediate period acts New section 13A validates certain intermediate period acts. The expression "intermediate period act" is defined in section 232A of the Commonwealth Act as an act that took place between 1 January 1994 and 23 December 1996 and that meets the various conditions set out in that section. Under the Commonwealth legislation the State must within 6 months of the commencement of its legislation notify certain details relating to intermediate period acts to the public and to native title bodies and claimants in relation to the affected land or waters. New section 13B provides that certain Category A intermediate period acts not involving public works extinguish native title. Category A intermediate acts are defined in section 232B of the Commonwealth Act and include the grant or vesting of freehold; the grant or vesting of a Scheduled interest; the grant or vesting of certain leaseholds that confer a right of exclusive possession; and the construction or establishment of a public work. New section 13C provides that certain Category A intermediate period acts extinguish native title. New section 13D provides that certain Category B intermediate period acts (defined by section 232C of the Commonwealth Act) extinguish native title. Category B acts are the grant of a lease that is not a Category A intermediate period act not including mining leases or certain leases for the benefit of Aboriginal peoples. 13D does not apply if 13H or 13L apply to it. New section 13E applies to Category C and D intermediate period acts (defined by section 232D and 232E of the Commonwealth Act) as the grant of a mining lease and an intermediate period act not being in Category A, B or C. New section 13E does not apply to an act if new section 13L applies to it. New section 13F preserves certain beneficial reservations and conditions notwithstanding the provisions of 13B, 13C, 13D or 13E. New section 13G provides that under section 22G of the Commonwealth Act, native title holders are entitled to compensation because of the validation by this Act of an intermediate period act attributable to the State. Compensation is payable by the State and to be determined in accordance with the principles contained in Division 5 of Part 2 of the Commonwealth Act. New Part 2B - Confirmation of past extinguishment of native title by certain valid or validated acts New section 13H confirms the extinguishment of native title by previous exclusive possession acts of the State, other than public works. The provisions apply to estates and interests validly granted or vested on or before 23 December 1996 and include: a Scheduled interest; a freehold estate and certain leaseholds, other than mining leases, that confer a right of exclusive possession; and in certain circumstances mining leases so far as they apply to certain developed land. New section 13I confirms the extinguishment of native title by previous exclusive possession acts of the State consisting of public works that were validly undertaken and commenced to be constructed or established on or before 23 December 1996. New section 13J preserves certain beneficial reservations and conditions, notwithstanding the provisions of 13H and 13I. New section 13K confirms the validity of the use by the Crown of waters and of certain land. New section 13L confirms the partial extinguishment of native title by previous non-exclusive possession acts of the State (defined in section 23F of the Commonwealth Act) such as non-exclusive agricultural leases and non-exclusive pastoral leases validly granted on or before 23 December 1996; legally enforceable rights to the grant of such leases created on or before that date and exercised after that date; and arrangements for the grant of such leases completed after that date but made on or before that date in good faith and evidenced in writing. New section 13M preserves certain beneficial reservations and conditions notwithstanding the provisions of 13L. New section 13N requires that certain written prescribed notices to be given in respect to non-exclusive possession acts to which section 23F(3)(c)(ii) of the Commonwealth Act applies to representatives of Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander bodies; registered native title bodies corporate; and registered native title claimants in relation to the land or waters that will be affected by the act, or acts of that class, in relation to the land or waters concerned. The person or body must be given an opportunity to comment on the act or class of acts. New section 13O provides for compensation under section 23J of the Commonwealth Act for any extinguishment under Part 2B of any native title rights and interests by an act under this Act. The compensation is payable by the State and is to be determined in accordance with the principles contained in Division 5 of Part 2 of the Commonwealth Act. Part 2C - Validation of future acts by agreement New section 13P sets out the circumstances in which new section 13Q will apply. New section 13Q provides that certain future acts are valid if the requirements of new section 13P are met. Part 3 - Amendments to the Pipelines Act 1967 (the Act) The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill before the house also amends the Pipelines Act 1967 to ensure that the Pipelines Act conforms with the amended Commonwealth Native Title Act. In December 1996, the Pipelines Act 1967 was amended to allow for the right to negotiate process to apply to pipelines which traversed non-private land. A pipeline licence could not be issued on non-private land without completing the right to negotiate process. This was done to provide pipeline proponents with certainty that the construction of a pipeline could be a valid act for the purposes of the Native Title Act. The 1998 amendments to the Commonwealth Native Title Act expressly provide that the right to negotiate process does not apply to oil and gas pipelines. As a result, the Pipelines Act again needs amending to comply with the Native Title Act. In order to achieve this, the amendments require pipeline proponents to follow a relevant procedure under the Native Title Act, before a pipeline licence can be granted. Relevant procedures may include reaching an indigenous land use agreement with native title parties, complying with the provisions of s.24KA (which applies to facilities for services to the public), or complying with the same procedural rights as apply to freehold title holders, and certain additional procedural rights." Clause 10 substitutes section 20(2) of the Act to provide that the grant of an easement does not authorise the compulsory acquisition of native title rights and interests. Clause 11 substitutes sections 22, 22A, 22B and 22C and inserts two new sections 22D and 22E. New section 22 provides for the compulsory acquisition of private land and that the Land Acquisition and Compensation Act 1986 applies. New section 22A provides for the compulsory acquisition of native title land and that the Land Acquisition Act 1986 applies. The Minister is authorised to comply with any relevant procedure under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). New section 22B provides for the referral of objections to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal). New section 22C provides for the determination of objections by the Tribunal. New section 22D provides for disputed claims for compensation in relation to native title including the right to just terms compensation. New section 22E provides for the validity of pipelines permits. Clause 13 makes a consequential amendment to Schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998.
The Committee makes no further comment. 7.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 7.2 The Bill amends the Legal Aid Act 1978 (the Act). The main purposes of the Bill are:
7.3 Clause 2 The amendments introduced by the Bill (saving Parts 3 and 4) come into operation on Royal Assent. Parts 3 and 4 commence operation on proclamation but not later than by 1 January 1999. Clause 4 inserts a new sub-section (2A) into section 24 of the Act and provides that in the making of a decision whether legal assistance is to be provided in respect of certain applications made under the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997, VLA is not required to have regard to certain financial matters pursuant to section 24 of the Act. In these cases the "means test" can be waived. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill continues and improves the arrangements made under the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997. That Act abolished what was known as the "Governors pleasure" system and established new procedures to deal with persons who are presented for trial before the County or Supreme Court charged with an indictable offence and who are found to be unfit to be tried or found not guilty on the ground of mental impairment. Persons formerly detained at the "Governors pleasure" can return to court for review of their status. It is proposed that where these people make an application for legal assistance from Victoria Legal Aid, in respect of applications under that Act, that the means test for legal aid be waived. The Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 sets up a system specifically designed to cater for offenders who are required to return to the court for determination of questions of release. This is not the normal process for prisoners. In general, prisoners make application to the adult parole board for the determination of a period of parole. This application can be made at no cost to the prisoner. It is appropriate therefore to waive the means test, to applications for assistance for proceedings under the Act, once a person has received an order under the Act or as a former detainee at the Governors pleasure." Clause 6 inserts a new section 27A into the Act and clarifies the situation where a person has made payments to VLA on account of out of pocket expenses in advance of legal assistance being provided and that assistance is subsequently not provided, that VLA must refund such amounts from the Fund. Clause 7 amends section 30 of the Act by substituting sub-sections (4) to (16F) for the old sub-sections (4) to (16). Practitioners will now apply for inclusion to any referral panel established under section 30 and are disqualified in certain circumstances from re-applying. Where applications are refused the practitioner may have the matter heard by an independent reviewer. VLA has power to remove a practitioner from a referral panel. A practitioner may also request to be removed from the panel. Removal of a practitioner from a panel is subject to review by an independent reviewer. Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968) Clause 8 substitutes new sub-sections (18) and (18A) in lieu of sub-section (18) of section 30 of the Act. The new section 30(18) and (18A) provides: (18) A decision of VLA or a determination of an independent reviewer under this section is final and not subject to appeal. (18A) Nothing in sub-section (18) prevents the taking of proceedings-
The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Section 30 allows Victoria Legal Aid to set up referral panels of practitioners who may be chosen to carry our legal aid services for Victoria Legal Aid. Only one panel has been established under this section. This constitutes most practitioners in Victoria. Section 30 also provides a process for Victoria Legal Aid to remove solicitors from the panel. This process is very cumbersome and unclear. Amendments are proposed to streamline the section 30 process and deal with a number of problems which have emerged with the current form of section 30. The most significant amendment is to remove the option of practitioners who are removed from the panel from making application to the Supreme Court. Grounds for removal provided in the Act include where a practitioner habitually takes an excessive time to defend persons charged with criminal offences and where a practitioner has ceased to practise. The removal of the Supreme Court appeal, which is costly and time-consuming for all parties involved, will also allow resources allocated by Victoria Legal Aid to defending its decision in the Supreme Court to be used for funding casework." Clause 11 inserts a new sub-section (4) in section 49B of the Act providing that it is the intention of section 30(18) (as substituted by the Bill) to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Committee notes the Ministers section 85 statement made in the Second Reading Speech: "Clause 11 of the Bill inserts a new section 49B(4) into the Act, which provides that it is the intention of the substituted section 30(18) to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. Clause 8 of the Bill substitutes the previous section 30(18) of the Act for a new section 30(18). The previous section 30(18) provided an appeal to the Supreme Court by a practitioner aggrieved by any exclusion or removal from a referral panel established under section 30. The Bill limits the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by removing this appeal to the Supreme Court. A system allowing an independent reviewer to hear and determine matters under section 30 was introduced in 1997. This independent review mechanism, in conjunction with the ability to bring proceedings under the Administrative Law Act 1978 in relation to removal of a practitioner from the panel, are retained in the Act. Those processes provide a fair avenue of redress for a practitioner aggrieved by a decision under section 30, without the need for recourse to the Supreme Court. Under the amended section 30, before Victoria Legal Aid can refuse to include a practitioner on a referral panel, the practitioner may have that "proposal refusal" heard and determined by an independent reviewer under section 30. Similarly, before Victoria Legal Aid may remove a practitioner from a referral panel established under section 30, the practitioner may have that "proposed removal" heard and determined by an independent reviewer. The removal of the appeal to the Supreme Court will not affect other available remedies. The substituted section 30(18) provides that nothing in that section prevents the taking of proceedings seeking any orders under the Administrative Law Act 1978 or seeking relief in the nature of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or quo warranto or the grant of a declaration or injunction."
Clauses 13 to 17 deal with funding arrangements. Clause 15 allow the VLA to enter into legal aid arrangements with the Commonwealth with the approval of the Attorney-General. The Committee makes no further comment. LICENSING AND TRIBUNAL (AMENDMENT) BILL 8.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 8.2 The Bill amends the following Acts: The Co-operatives Act 1996; the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995; the Motor Car Traders Act 1986; the Prostitution Control Act 1994; the Second-Hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 1989; the Small Claims Act 1973; the Tribunals and Licensing Authorities (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1998; and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998. The Bill makes consequential amendments to a number of other related Acts. 8.3 Clause 2 Parts 1 and 2 commence operation on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions, saving Part 8 and section 37(3), commence upon proclamation but not later than by 1 July 1999. Clause 2(2) provides that Part 8 and section 37(3) are deemed to have come into operation on 1 July 1998. Part 8 (clauses 21 and 22) amends the Tribunals and Licensing Authorities (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1998. The Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill states that the amendments address inadvertent errors contained in amendments made by that Act and amendments which should have been included in that Act but were inadvertently left out.
Clause 37(3) substitutes a reference to the Business Licensing Authority for a reference to the Tribunal in section 22(3) of the Estate Agents Act 1980. In respect to clause 37(3) the Committee notes the retrospective operation of the provision involves a machinery of government nomenaclature provision and is justified in the circumstances. Clauses 3 to 5 make amendments to the Co-operatives Act 1996. Clauses 6 and 7 make amendments to the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 a builder is not able to demand final payment under a major domestic building contract (that is, one worth more than $5,000) until the work is completed in accordance with the plans and specifications of the contract and the owner is given either a copy of a permit under the Building Act 1993 or a copy of the certificate of final inspection. This has enabled certain owners to extend unreasonably the time for making the final payment in circumstances where only very minor works or minor rectification remains outstanding. This has also happened where a discrete item requiring installation is not available from a third party supplier. In either case, the owner can occupy the building but nevertheless at times withholds final payment to the builder. Before the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995, domestic building contracts relied upon a concept of "practical completion" as entitling builders to demand final payment. This led to significant dissatisfaction from owners who were frequently left in a position where final payment was made and unfinished works never completed. The Act addressed this problem but the possibility of abuse has swung in favour of owners. The Bill solves this problem by expanding the powers of VCAT (operating in the domestic building list) to be able to order part payment of the final instalment to the builder in appropriate circumstances as well as payment of the amount due in dispute to the domestic builders fund pending resolution of the dispute. This amendment will help prevent inequity to either owners or builders during the completion of domestic building." Clauses 8 and 9 amend the Motor Car Traders Act 1986. Clauses 10 and 11 amend the Prostitution Control Act 1994. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The amendments in the Bill to the Prostitution Control Act 1994 are proposed to give the Director of the Office of Fair Trading and Business Affairs the power to take disciplinary action against licensed prostitution service providers and approved managers, to confer certain ancillary powers on the Director " Clauses 12 to 15 amend the Second-Hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 1989 (the Act). Clause 12 amends the definition of "associate" in section 3(1) of the Act so as to exclude from the definition a spouse or de facto spouse who is not, has not been, and will not be involved in the persons business as a second-hand dealer and pawnbroker. (see excerpt below from Second Reading Speech). Clause 13 inserts a new section 6 in the Act so as to exclude from some of the categories of persons ineligible to be registered, persons who have been given permission to be registered under the new section 10A. (see Second Reading Speech excerpts below). Clause 14 amends section 9B of that Act to provide for reviews by VCAT of decisions of the Business Licensing Authority in respect of applications for permission under section 10A of the Act, and to impose, vary or revoke a condition of a permission. Clause 15 substitutes a new section 10 and inserts new sections 10A (referred to above) and 10B. The provisions relate to automatic cancellation of registration, permission to be registered or to continue to be registered and conditions placed on such permission respectively. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The definition of associate has been found to be problematic due to the unintended broadness of its application. The Bill amends the definition of associate in the Second-Hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 1989 to make it clear that a person who has a spouse who has disqualifying convictions or is insolvent is still eligible for registration provided that the spouse is not involved in the business. The Bill also amends the Act to provide that a person may be permitted to register even though he or she does not meet all of the eligibility requirements. The amendments are generally aimed at providing an exception where a registered person might otherwise be ineligible due to offences by that person or by an associate of that person. They are designed to overcome the perceived inflexibility in the present provisions which has given rise to some concern. The permission procedure itself is based on similar existing provisions in the Estate Agents Act 1980 and the Motor Car Traders Act 1986 and similar provisions in the Consumer Credit (Finance Brokers) Bill. Lastly, the Act will be amended to ensure that persons who have been disqualified from participating in other industries are required to seek the permission of the Business Licensing Authority to enter or carry business as a second-hand dealer and pawnbroker." Clauses 16 to 20 amend the Small Claims Act 1973 (the Act). Clause 16 amends the definition in section 2 of the Act by replacing the definition of "consumer" with a definition of "customer" and thereby removes the prohibition of a customer being either a corporation or a person who buys or hires goods and services in the course of trade or business or for resale or re-hire. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The definition of "consumer" in the Small Claims Act 1973 excludes both persons who buy goods or services in the course of trade or business and companies. As a result, only individuals are able to use the expeditious and inexpensive procedures of VCAT to solve their small claim disputes with traders. A trader who wishes to solve a similar dispute with another trader is obliged to bring an action against that other trader in the Magistrates Court. The Bill replaces the definition of "consumer" in the Small Claims Act 1973 with one of "customer" and amends it by removing these two exclusions and so allowing VCAT to hear what are generally known as "trader/trader disputes". Small business, corporate or otherwise, will therefore be able to access the same procedure available to individuals. Thus a company might, as a customer, bring an action against another trader in VCAT one day and find itself being sued, as a trader, in VCAT the next. The company in question could be a proprietary company as well as a public company. The option for either to bring an action in the Magistrates Court will remain. The right to bring an action in VCAT will remain solely with a consumer and the right will lie against a trader. A trader will not be able to bring an action against a consumer." Clause 18 inserts a new section 17 in the Act and allows a court to stay proceedings before it on the application of the defendant if the court considers the proceedings would be more appropriately dealt with by VCAT, provided the interests of the plaintiff are not materially disadvantaged by the granting of the stay. Clause 19 removes the word "applicant" from section 18 of the Act allowing the VCAT to make an order against an applicant in a small claim proceeding. An amendment to section 19 of the Act allows the parties, by written consent, to wave the jurisdictional limit of $10,000 of VCAT allowing VCAT to make an order in excess of that amount. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The level of $10,000 being the upper limit of a small claim will not be amended although the figure may be reviewed if the need arises and the caseload of VCAT so demands. The Bill will, however, allow VCAT to hear a small claim dispute involving a figure greater than $10,000 if all parties to the action so agree. Another change made by the Bill will allow VCAT to make an order against the applicant which is currently prohibited by the Small Claims Act 1973. This will provide VCAT with a greater degree of flexibility in determining a suitable remedy if the justice of the case so requires. The conferral of this new jurisdiction on VCAT combined with these other amendments will greatly assist small business in Victoria by providing it with a much quicker and less expensive way of resolving disputes with other traders." Clause 23 amends provisions of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998. Clauses 24 to 34 constitute Part 10 of the Bill and make amends to a number of Acts. The amendments replace references to the former Administrative Appeals Tribunal or a reference to "the court" with references to VCAT. These amendments were inadvertently omitted from earlier legislation. Clauses 35 to 39 makes amendments to a number of other licensing Acts by, inter alia, inserting new definitions of "externally-administered body corporate" and "insolvent under administration" in those Acts. The Committee makes no further comment. LOCAL GOVERNMENT (NILLUMBIK SHIRE COUNCIL) BILL 9.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Rob Maclellan MP with the Honourable Tom Reynolds MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 9.2 The Bill dismisses the Nillumbik Shire Council; makes provision for the expiry of the Order in Council that applies to that Council; and sets a date for a general election of the Nillumbik Shire Council. 9.3 Clause 2 The Bill comes into operation upon Royal Assent. Clause 3 The Bill must be construed as if it were part of the Local Government Act 1989. Clause 4 defines the "Order in Council" made on 13 October 1998. Clause 5 dismisses the Nillumbik Shire Council. The councillors cease to hold office and the administrator appointed by the Order in Council continues as the administrator of the Council. Clause 6 sets 20 March 1999 as the date for a general election to be held for the Nillumbik Shire Council. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill provides for the next general election of the Nillumbik Shire Council be set at 20 March 1999 in line with other council elections. Following the election the Chief Executive Officer of Nillumbik Shire Council must call a council meeting within 14 days of the declaration of the result of the election by the returning officer. The Order in Council expires at the start of the council meeting. The Bill also clarifies that section 36(2) of the Local Government Act 1989 will apply to an election held under this Act, so that a subsequent election will be held on the third Saturday in March every third year. The Government recognises the desirability of returning an elected government to Nillumbik as soon as good governance is restored to the Shire. This Bill ensures that elections will take place as soon as possible."
The Committee makes no further comment. MELBOURNE CITY LINK (AMENDMENT) BILL 10.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Rob Maclellan MP with the Honourable Tom Reynolds MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 10.2 The Bill amends the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 (the Act) and certain other Acts. The main purposes of the Bill are:
10.3 Clause 2 The amendments, saving section 18(2) and (5), come into operation on Royal Assent. Section 18(2) and (5) come into operation on proclamation but not later than by 31 December 2000. Clause 12 inserts new definitions into Part 4 of the Act including for "start-up period" being a prescribed period during which lower penalties may apply. Clause 15 replaces section 73 with new sections 73 to 73E and creates an offence to use a vehicle on the City Link or Exhibition Street Extension (the roads) if it is not registered (unless otherwise exempt from registration). One trip being one offence. It is a defence if the driver believed on reasonable grounds that the vehicle was registered to use the roads. New sections 73A, 73B and 73C deal with the on-going and temporary registration and cancellation of registration of vehicles to use the roads. New section 73D requires a relevant corporation to give certain tolling zone use information to persons seeking registration. It is an offence to fail to do so. New section 73E deals with certain notice of cancellation or suspension requirements by corporations to persons in accordance with tolling agreements. Clause 16 substitutes section 75 and makes it an offence to obtain registration by fraudulent or collusive means. Clause 20 amends section 82 of the Act to enable an infringement notice penalty for toll evasion to be reduced during the start-up period to a fine not exceeding $100. The penalty after the start-up period will revert to $100 (one penalty unit). Clause 21 substitutes section 86 of the Act and allows the PERIN procedure under the Magistrates Court Act 1989 to be used for infringement notices for tolling fines. Clause 22 amends sections 87 and 89 of the Act in relation to the production of evidence generated by the tolling scanners or from the tolling records for use in legal proceedings relating to tolling. Clause 23 substitutes section 88 of the Act and allows evidence generated by the tolling system to be used on a similar basis to existing red light and speed camera legislation. Clause 25 inserts a new Division 3 in Part 4 of the Act and establish a regime for the privacy of tolling records. Unauthorised use will attract a maximum fine of $10,000. Section 90B will permit access to tolling records to the police for the enforcement of the criminal law (indictable offences only, but including offences committed outside Victoria that would have been indictable offences if committed in Victoria). Section 90C requires the police to maintain records of access to information provided under 90B for the purposes of monitoring by the Ombudsman. 90D allows courts to use tolling records to be used for the purpose of enforcing and executing Court orders. New section 91 authorises the Roads Corporation and its staff and agents to disclose information to the enforcement agency for the purposes of tolling information. Clause 26 allows a person authorised by the Minister to inspect tolling records. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Transurban proposes to offer an anonymous account under which owners may avoid disclosing personal or vehicle registration details. Special commercial conditions apply to such accounts. The Bill permits such a product.
Unauthorised use or disclosure is an offence and carries a fine of up to $10,000. The existing provisions were modelled on the privacy laws for motor registration records, which were extensively amended last year." The Committee notes, but does not herein reproduce, the comments in the Ministers Second Reading Speech delivered on 22 October 1998 relevant to the privacy of tolling records resulting from the tolling regime introduced by the Act, as amended by this Bill. Clause 30 inserts new sections 114A and 114B in the Act and authorises the relevant corporation to remove stationery vehicles and abandoned property from hazardous locations, such as tunnels. Clause 31 amends the regulation making powers under section 118 of the Act prescribing the method for the production of evidence from the tolling system for use in legal proceedings and exempting vehicles from registration. Clause 35 amends section 13 of the Ombudsman Act 1973 to confer jurisdiction on the ombudsman to monitor police compliance with the proposed new regime of tolling records use for law enforcement purposes introduced by the provisions of this Bill. New section 22B allows the Ombudsman and authorised officers to enter police premises for the purposes of enforcing the toll records provisions and 22C requires the police to give reasonable assistance to the Ombudsman carrying out monitoring functions. Clause 37 inserts a new section 25A requiring the Ombudsman to report annually to the Minister on the results of the monitoring with a copy of the report also to be provided to the Chief Commissioner of Police and the Attorney-General. Clauses 42 and 43 amend the Impounding of Livestock Act 1994 to confer power on the operators of City Link and the Exhibition Street Extension the powers of a highway authority to remove stray animals and to deliver them to the nearest pound. Clause 44 amends the Magistrates Court Act 1989 in several respects as a consequence of the new tolling enforcement and infringement procedures introduced by this Bill. Clause 45 inserts a new section 9AA into the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. This will empower the WorkCover Authority, as the "Competent Authority" for the transport of dangerous goods in Victoria, to prohibit or regulate the transport of dangerous goods (as defined in that Act) on particular routes, in particular areas or at particular times. The purpose is a general power not limited to the City Link, but will enable City Link to prohibit the use of City Link tunnels by certain vehicles. The Committee makes no further comment. RACING AND BETTING ACTS (AMENDMENT) BILL 11.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Tom Reynolds MP with the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 22 October 1998. 11.2 The Bill amends the Racing Acts 1958, the Lotteries Gaming and Betting Act 1966, the Stamps Act 1958, the Gaming No. 2 Act 1997 and the Gaming and Betting Act 1994. 11.3 Clause 2 provides that Part 1 comes into operation on Royal Assent. The remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than by 1 December 1999. Amendments to the Racing Act 1958 (the Act) Clause 5 amends section 5 of the Racing Act 1958 to provide that it is lawful for certain types of wagering to take place at any time on approved racecourses. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill will enable bookmakers to conduct sports betting at approved racecourses at any time. Sports bookmakers are currently confined to accepting bets while on a racecourse only when a race meeting is in progress. This restriction represents a major competitive disadvantage compared to their interstate counterparts who are generally entitled to operate on a 24 hour basis. Tabcorp, which also conducts fixed odds sports betting, has no time restriction imposed upon its operation." Clause 11 amends section 40(1) of the Act to provide that appointment to the Harness Racing Board may be made for a period of up to 3 years as specified in the instrument of appointment. The current provision is a fixed 3 year term. Clause 13 amends section 45 of the Act to empower the Minister, on the recommendation of the Harness Racing Board to suspend the members of a committee or other managing body of any harness racing club and appoint an administrator of the club. Clause 15 amends the Act by inserting new sections 49A and 49C and deals with the hearing of appeals by the Harness Racing Board. Clause 19 amends section 80 of the Act and deals with the hearing of appeals by the Greyhound Racing Control Board. Clause 23 amends section 94A of the Act to extend the time limits and circumstances for the lodgement of complaints against bookmakers who default in the payment of wagers. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill enhances the operation of the guarantee scheme which protects punters against defaulting bookmakers. The time limits for punters to lodge claims in relation to unpaid wagers are to be extended to provide a period of 60 days for a cash betting claim to be lodged and 21 days for a credit betting claim. In addition, credit bettors will be afforded a second opportunity to lodge claims after being notified that a bookmaker has defaulted. The legislation will also be amended to clarify that claims lodged with the Victorian Bookmakers Association are covered by the scheme." Amendments to the Lotteries Gaming and Betting Act 1966 (the Act) Clause 26 amends section 16 of the Act to recognise that bets made in accordance with section 4 of the Racing Act 1958 or a club betting permit are wagers recoverable by law. Clause 27 amends section 38(2A) of the Act to provide that it is optional for fees to be prescribed for approvals for betting on foot races and bicycle races. Amendments to the Stamps Act 1958 (the Act) Clause 33 amends section 118(2) of the Act to permit the Comptroller of Stamps or any authorised officer powers of entry and inspection at a race-course or sports ground or at premises specified in a betting permit to ascertain compliance with the Act and the regulations. The Committee makes no further comment. RAIL CORPORATIONS (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL 12.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1998 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Honeywood MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 27 October 1998. 12.2 The Bill amends the Rail Corporations Act 1996 and the Transport Act 1983. 12.3 Clause 2 provides that Part 1 and sections 40 to 43 commence operation on Royal Assent and the remaining provisions commence on proclamation but not later than on 1 January 2000. Part 2 - Amendments to the Rail Corporations Act 1996 (the Act) Clause 14 insert new sections 59A to 59C and deal with the officers and employees of rail corporations, their deemed transfer and the employment of those transferred employees on the same terms and conditions as with the former employer. Clause 15 substitutes new Parts 4 to 7 in the Act. In the substituted Part 4 new section 60 requires owners or occupiers of land, on reasonable written request to fell and remove any tree or wood that is within 60 metres of a railway track that could obstruct a view of a signal box. New section 61 provides that any person to which the section applies (see s. 61(3)) is under no obligation to fence or contribute to the fencing of any portion of a railway or tramway or be liable for any damage that may be caused by reason of any railway or tramway not being fenced in or fenced off. The requirement to fence or maintain fencing is discretionary. (see s. 61(2)). The Committee notes the provisions in relation to fencing and that similar provisions are found in the existing legislation. The Committee notes the policy reasons why the requirement to fence or maintain fencing is discretionary and that there are substantive policy reasons not to attach legal liability for failure to fence or maintain fencing. Alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 (section 4D(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968) Clause 15 (cont.) The substituted Part 5 deals with prohibited interests in certain shares and trusts and imposes cross-ownership restrictions on metropolitan train and tram operators and persons who have controlling interests in those operators. If the Office of the Regulator-General (ORG) determines that a person has a prohibited interest it may require that the offender dispose of the relevant shares or desist from controlling the relevant corporation within 3 months or a longer period if so specified. If the person fails to dispose of those shares they are forfeited to the Crown (new section 96). New section 100 provides that a person on whom notice of a determination of ORG is served under Part 5 may appeal to the Supreme Court against the determination. An appeal must be made within 21 days of service (section 102 deals with service) of such a determination and the period of limitation may not be extended. Sub-section (5) states that except as provided under Part 5 a determination may not be challenged or called into question. New section 105 provides that it is the intention of section 100(5) to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Clause 205 states that it is the intention of the new section 59T of the Rail Corporations Act 1996, as proposed to be inserted by clause 203 of this Bill, to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The variation limits the Supreme Courts ability to review determinations of the Office of the Regulator-General made pursuant to part 3A of this Bill except as provided for in Part 3A. The Part provides that the Court can only vary or quash a determination made pursuant to Part 3A where the Court is satisfied that proper grounds for making the determination did not exist. The reason for varying section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 is to ensure that rail and tram services cannot be jeopardised by appeals against determinations on frivolous or vexatious grounds." The Committee is of the view that, subject to the amendments referred to above the proposed section 85 are appropriate and desirable in all the circumstances. New section 104 excludes from the operation of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 documents disclosing the identity of any person expressing an interest in purchasing any property of V/Line Freight, V/Line Passenger Corporation, Met Train 1, Met Train 2, Met Tram 1, Met Tram 2 or any shares in a train or tram operator or any document which discloses the terms of any such expression of interest or offer. New section 106A in Part 7 (Transitional) provides that on the privatisation of V/Line Freight the Public Transport Corporation established under Part II of the Transport Act 1983 becomes the successor in law of V/Line Freight and the directors and CEO of V/Line go out of office. Part 3 - Amendments to the Transport Act 1983 (the Act) Clause 22 inserts a new section 8 and 9 of the Act establishing a Director of Public Transport and sets out the powers and functions of the Director. Clause 27 inserts definitions of ticket offence and ticket infringement in section 208 of the Act. Clause 29 provides a new definition for authorised officer in section 211 of the Act for the purpose of ticket infringements. Clause 30 amends section 212 of the Act and deals with ticket and transport infringements and allows authorised officers and members of the police force to serve infringements notices and allows regulations to be made prescribing ticket infringements for which notices may be served. Clause 31 inserts a new sub-section (2A) in section 218B and empowers authorised officers to request name and address where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that a person has committed or is about to commit certain specified offences. Clause 32 inserts a new section 219AA and empowers authorised persons to detain suspected offenders for reasons of public safety; to ensure the persons appearance in court; to preserve public order; to prevent the continuation of the offence or the commission of a further offence. The authorised person may ask another person for assistance in such detention and must not use any more force than is reasonable in the circumstances. The authorised person must give the alleged offender into the charge of the police as soon as practicable after detaining them. Clause 33 amends section 220 of the Act dealing with the power to remove offenders from premises or property of the corporation or company. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "Authorised officers employed by the franchises will be given certain powers which officers of the PTC currently have (for example powers to require a name and address, to remove offenders from vehicles and to detain offenders until they can be handed to Police). The operators will also have power to issue infringement notices for fare evasion. The enforcement of these notices once issued will be by the Department of Infrastructure and the proceeds from any fines issued will be retained by the State." Clause 34 inserts new sub-sections (1A) and (1B) in section 221 of the Act to allow a passenger transport company, with the approval of the Secretary or the Director to determine conditions to which a ticket of a specified class issued by it is to be subject and publish those conditions in the Government Gazette. Clause 35 makes consequential amendments in relation to graffiti offences. Clause 36 inserts a new section 229(1AA) in the Act and deals with who may bring proceedings for ticket offences. Clause 39 inserts a new section 249C in the Act which provides an exemption, in respect of the construction or design of tram or light rail vehicles and the provision of stoping facilities and associated facilities for passenger transport services adjacent to tram infrastructure, from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 which prohibit discrimination on the basis of impairment. The exemption expires on 1 January 2008 (section 249C(2)). The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The government spelled out its intentions in the 12 Passenger Guarantees announced in April. It has guarantees on service levels, fares, punctuality, reliability, service quality, safety and a range of other issues of importance to passengers. These guarantees will be enshrined in legally binding long term contracts with future private sector operators." The Committee makes no further comment. STATE TAXATION (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL 13.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 7 October 1998 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 27 October 1998. 13.2 The Bill amends the:
13.3 Clause 2 sets out the respective commencement dates for provisions of the Bill as follows:
Part 2 - Amendments to the Business Franchise (Petroleum Products) Act 1979 (the Act) Clause 3 amends section 17 of the Act to allow an amount of overpayment of subsidy to be off-set against future subsidy payments. Clause 4 amends section 19 of the Act by obliging a person who no longer requires an exemption certificate and does not expect to require such a certificate to surrender it. Clause 5 inserts new sections 20A and 20B into the Act concerning offences of fraudulent use of exemption certificates to obtain fuel or giving false particulars of a diesel fuel exemption certificate. Penalties of up to $60,000 for a body corporate and up to $12,000 in any other case are provided for. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill makes a number of technical amendments to the Business Franchise (Petroleum Products) Act 1979 to improve compliance aspects of the petroleum and diesel subsidy scheme introduced following the High Courts Ha and Lim decision in 1997 in order to reduce possible abuse of the scheme." Part 3 - Amendments to the Financial Institutions Duty Act 1982 (the Act) Clause 6 substitutes a new definition of broker in section 3(1) of the Act to mean "a person, (other a bank), who is a broker under the Australian Stock Exchange Rules." The existing definition provides that broker means "a person, firm or corporation (other than a bank) who or which is a member of the Australian Stock Exchange Limited." The Committee notes that the amendment to the definition is deemed to have come into operation on 13 October 1998. The Committee will write to the Minister seeking his comment for the reason why it is thought to be desirable to give retrospective operation to the amended definition. Part 4 - Amendments to the Land Tax Act 1958 (the Act) Clause 9 amends section 4(4) of the Act to include a member of the police force of or above the rank of inspector as a person to whom information under that Act may be disclosed by the Commissioner of State Revenue. Clause 10 makes a number of amendments to 13H of the Act. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "The Bill also amends the secrecy provisions of the Land Tax Act 1958 to allow officers employed in administering the Land Tax Act 1958 to give taxpayer information to the police, thus overcoming an anomaly whereby the State Revenue Office can give taxpayer information to the police under all other State taxation Acts but not the Land Tax Act 1958. A further amendment is made in relation to the exemption from land tax which is granted in respect of the Principal Place of Residence, introduced by the Government earlier this year. The Government wishes to ensure that property owners are not penalised by delays in the construction of their new home, or by a period of substantial renovations during which they cannot occupy that property. As a result, this Bill clarifies the operation of section 13H of the Land Tax Act 1958 which provides for a refund of land tax to an owner of unoccupied land who, having paid tax for that land, later commences to use it as a principal place of residence. The provision currently allows a refund of the tax paid for the year in which occupation commences, provided the land is then occupied as the principal place of residence for more than 6 months. This amendment will also allow for the owner to claim a refund of any land tax which was assessed against and paid by the owner for the year preceding the tax year in which the owner occupied that land as a principal place of residence, provided that no principal place of residence exemption was claimed in respect of another property for that year." The Committee notes that the provisions amending this Act are deemed to have commenced on 26 May 1998. The amendments are designed to have a beneficial effect and do not to involve any additional burden, obligation or tax. In the circumstances the Committee believes the retrospective operation of the provisions is acceptable. Part 5 - Amendments to the Liquor Control Act 1987 (the Act) Clause 11 amends section 119A(1)(b) of the Act to permit the payment of a subsidy under that Act to an interstate supplier or distributor who sells liquor into Victoria if the supplier or distributor holds a licence in Victoria under the Act or holds a licence under the equivalent legislation of another State or Territory. The Committee notes that the provision amending this Act is deemed to have commenced at 3.30 p.m. on 6 August 1997. The amendment confers the payment of a subsidy where no entitlement previously existed. In the circumstances the Committee believes the retrospective operation of the provision is acceptable. Part 6 - Amendments to the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 (the Act) Clauses 12 to 15 concern amends to the Act imposing pay-roll tax on payments made to employment agents by their client businesses in respect of on-hires workers. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "This amendment is necessary to overcome the effect of the recent decision handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of Drake Personnel Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue. In that case, the Supreme Court found that on-hired temporary personnel supplied by Drake Personnel to its clients are not common law employees of Drake and many are not deemed to be employees under section 3C of the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971. As a result, a large percentage of payments by an employment agent for services rendered by its temporary personnel are not taxable. Furthermore, the decision creates an environment that encourages other businesses to structure engagement arrangements simply to avoid pay-roll tax if they are to remain competitive and undermine the revenue base. The Bill meets key Government objectives introducing a robust regime which will clarify liability for pay-roll tax, addresses inequities that result under the relevant contract provisions in section 3C of the Act, and, importantly, will not lead to a broadening of the tax base overall. The Bill defines an employment agency contract and deems the client to be the employer of the person performing the work for pay-roll tax purposes. Imposing liability on the client, or end-user, prevents the cost of pay-roll tax being passed on from employment agents to clients whose wages would otherwise be exempt under the Act if they employed the workers directly. Similarly, it ensures that clients with total pay-rolls, including payments to agencies, that remain below the small business threshold will not incur tax. Under this regime, payments made by clients in respect of services provided by workers under employment agency contracts are deemed to be wages. However, in recognition that a component, representing an employment agents commissions, is usually included in these payments, a prescribed deduction will be allowed where this occurs. The amendments also ensure that the relevant contract provisions are prevented from applying to employment agency arrangements. In other jurisdictions that have already introduced employment agency provisions the liability for tax is from the commencement of the contract. However, in response to industry representations the Government has decided to provide an exemption from liability for short-term engagements with any one client. This will be achieved through an exemption from liability during a month on any engagement that is for less than eight days in that calender month. A supplementary amendment to the introduction of agency provisions is made to the Taxation Administration Act 1997 to allow an employment agency to collect pay-roll tax on behalf of its clients, as agencies may wish to provide this service as part of the overall package of services provided to their clients. Avoidance practices will be addressed by general anti-avoidance provisions included in this Bill. The Bill also amends the relevant contract provisions of the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 to correct an unintended wide interpretation by the courts as to the test of providing services to the public generally." Clauses 17 and 18 amend section 10 of the Act and insert a new section 10A and concerns the exemption to pay pay-roll tax on wages paid by a body corporate for services performed in connection with the activities of a municipal council or councils under a written arrangement. Clause 18 identifies the criteria upon which the exemption in section 10 is to apply. The Committee notes that the amendments in clauses 17 and 18 are deemed to have come into operation on 1 July 1998. The amendments confer beneficial exemptions from pay-roll tax liability where they did not previously exist. In the circumstances the Committee believes the retrospective operation of the provisions are acceptable. Part 7 - Amendments to the Stamps Act 1958 The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech: "A number of new definitions are inserted into the Act as part of the amendments to impose duty on a new marketable security product, namely instalment warrants. A minor amendment is also made to recognise the change in structure within the Australian Stock Exchange and the new business rules applicable to brokers. The Bill also changes the nexus for duty levied on policies of insurance to property insured in Victoria or a risk or contingency which may occur in Victoria to ensure that there is no double taxation arising from a different nexus operating across the two States. A number of amendments are made to the Stamps Act 1958 which are consequential upon the passage of amendments to the Road Safety Act 1986 earlier in these sittings. An important change is also made regarding stamp duty on returns on the sale of sheep and goats, which follows the Governments recent decision, in consultation with the industry, to increase the level of compensation paid to farmers whose stock has been affected by Ovine Johnes disease. The Victorian sheep industry also has an obligation to contribute to the national Ovine Johnes disease control program. These increased levels of compensation have necessitated the increase in stamp duty. Heading 17A of the Third Schedule to the Stamps Act 1958 deals with statements and returns on the sale of sheep and goats and is being amended to increase the rate of stamp duty on the sale of sheep and goats and their carcases from 9 cents to 12 cents. This stamp duty is collected to pay compensation to producers for sheep and goats slaughtered on account of infection with Ovine Johnes disease." Part 8 - Amends the Taxation Administration Act 1997 The Committee makes no further comment. CONSUMER CREDIT (FINANCE BROKERS) BILL 14.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 2 September 1998 by the Honourable Jan Wade MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 3 September 1998. 14.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 6 of 1998 on 6 October 1998 (at page 3). The Committee wrote to the Minister on 6 October 1998 in the following terms: "The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee considered the above Bill at a meeting on 5 October 1998. The Committee expressed concern at clause 4 which inserts a new section 37B into the Consumer Credit (Victoria) Act 1995: The Governor in Council may, by Order published in the Government Gazette, declare that this Part, wholly or to the extent specified in the Order, does not apply to-
The Committee is concerned at the very broad declaratory power sought to be introduced by clause 4 and notes that a similar regulation enabling provision is contained in the Act to be repealed (section 3(2) of the Finance Brokers Act 1969). The Committee is concerned that specified cases or classes of cases may be exempted from the operation of the Act either in part or in whole either with conditions or unconditionally. The Committee further notes that no explanation is provided in either the Explanatory Memorandum or the Second Reading Speech for the necessity of such a broad power. The Committee is of the view that clauses which allow for the amendment of the relevant Act by subordinate legislation, such as a regulation or Government Gazettal of a Governor in Council Order declaring that an Act or a provision of an Act does not apply to, or applies with prescribed changes, are generally objectionable. The Committee believes that such a provisions would properly be characterised as a Henry VIII clause enabling the Act to be expressly or impliedly amended by subordinate legislation or Executive action. The Committee therefore seeks your response as to why such a power is desirable or warranted in the circumstances. The Committee would appreciate your response by facsimile at your earliest opportunity." 14.3 - Ministers response "Thank you for your letter of 6 October 1998 about the above Bill. I refer in particular to your concerns about proposed section 37B of the Consumer Credit (Victoria) Act 1995. Section 37B would provide for exemptions by Order if Council from proposed Part 4A or specified provisions of that Part. You have stated that the Committee is of the view that clauses which allow for the amendment of the relevant Act by subordinate regulations declaring that an Act or a provision of an Act does not apply to, or applies with prescribed changes, are generally objectionable, and that such a provision would be properly characterised as a "Henry VIII clause" enabling the Act to be expressly or impliedly amended by subordinate legislation or Executive action. I note that the provision under discussion does not allow for the modification of an Act, as distinct form exemption therefrom. The use of such exemption powers has been common in Victorian and Commonwealth statutes for many years. Indeed the proposed exemption section is relevantly identical with section 10 of the Consumer Credit (Victoria) Act 1995, which provides for exemptions from Part 4 thereof. In turn section 10 is a simplified version of section 19 of the Credit Act 1984, and as you note, proposed section 37B is equivalent to section 3(2) of the Finance Brokers Act 1969. The policy reasons for permitting exemptions to be done by subordinate regulation include the need for flexibility and rapid response to particular situations. Perhaps more importantly, a power of exemption results in no increased burden on the citizen, but rather the release from an obligation or the lessening of an existing burden. As such the role of Parliament in protecting the citizen from undue obligation has already been discharged. I trust that these remarks are of assistance to the Committee. I would be happy to provide any additional material which may assist the Committee." 14.4 - Attachment - Non-exhaustive list of Victorian statutory provisions allowing for exemption by Order in Council. Agriculture and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992, s. 5 Benefit Associations Act 1958, s. 4(4)(g) Credit Act 1984, s. 19 Consumer Credit (Victoria) Act 1995, s. 10 Control of Weapons Act 1990, s. 5(2) Dangerous Goods Act 1985, s. 9A Domestic (Feral and Nuisance) Animals Act 1994, s. 5 Electricity Industry Act 1993, s. 160 Environment Protection Act 1970, s. 24(5) and 42A(13) Farm Produce Wholesale Act 1990, s. 4(4) MUTUAL RECOGNITION (VICTORIA) BILL 15.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 2 September 1998 by the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP with the Honourable Pat McNamara MP. The Second Reading Speech was delivered on 3 September 1998. 15.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 6 of 1998 on 6 October 1998 (at page 12). The relevant extract of the Committees comment in relation to the Bill is set out: "The Committee believes that legislative expiry should generally be treated similarly to commencement. The Committee believes that an open ended expiry clause would not seem to have sufficient regard for the institution of Parliament and would have to be clearly justified. Whilst the Committee notes the comments of the Minister in the Second Reading Speech it will write to the Minister seeking further clarification for the reasons why a termination by proclamation clause is regarded as necessary in this instance, rather than a repealing Act." 15.3 - Ministers response "Thank you for your letter concerning the Mutual Recognition (Victoria) Bill and raising the issue of the proposal to terminate Victorias adoption of the Commonwealth Mutual Recognition Act 1992 on a day fixed by the Governor in Council by proclamation in the Government Gazette. I note your comments about the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committees view that the removal of a statute or a provision of a statute ought to be regarded as the exercise of legislative power and should be referred back to the Parliament for repeal. My Government is committed to the principles of mutual recognition and has no intention of terminating Victorias participation in the mutual recognition scheme. However, it is important to ensure that the Government has the utmost flexibility, should it be necessary to do so. A termination by proclamation clause was used at the time the Parliament referred legislative power in relation to industrial relations to the Commonwealth Parliament. I also note your prosed alternative of a power to suspend the operation of a provision or provisions of the Act pending repeal at the next sitting. I have been advised that this proposal will not necessarily address your concern, in the event that a Government suspends the operation of a provision or provisions of the Act but does not introduce repealing legislation in the Parliament. You will note that the termination by proclamation clause has bi-partisan support, as evidenced by the Leader of the Oppositions words during the debate on the Bill in the Legislative Assembly." HEALTH SERVICES (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL 16.1 The Committee reported on this Bill in Alert Digest no. 6 on 6 October 1998 and wrote to the Minister on that date expressing concern in respect to clause 6 of the Bill. The Committee again wrote to the Minister on 20 October 1998. The Committee notes that to date no reply has been received. The Committee will write a further letter to the Minister seeking a reply as soon as possible. PETROLEUM BILL 17.1 The Committee reported on this Bill in Alert Digest no. 6 on 6 October 1998 and wrote to the Minister on that date expressing concern in respect to clause 252(2)(f) of the Bill. The Committee again wrote to the minister on 20 October 1998. The Committee notes that to date no reply has been received. The Committee will write a further letter to the Minister seeking a reply as soon as possible.
|