|
|
|
|
Alert Digest No. 5
of 1998 LIVESTOCK DISEASE CONTROL (AMENDMENT) BILL 1.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 13 May 1998 by the Honourable Pat McNamara MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. 1.2 The purpose of the Bill is to amend the Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 (the Act), to provide for the introduction of a permanent identification scheme initially for cattle and to improve the operation of the legislation. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech:- "The amendments to the Act contained in this Bill will allow the implementation of the national scheme for the permanent identification of cattle from later this year. The scheme will be implemented in Victoria through the use of permanent whole-of-life identification devices produced to national standards. While the process of approving devices will be standardised by a national advisory body, States will remain responsible for administering the scheme by granting identification numbers, approving manufacture of devices, and ensuring the integrity of operating systems." 1.3 Clause 3 amends the definition of "exotic disease" in section 3 of the Act to enable the Governor in Council to declare a condition of livestock, as well as a contagious or infectious disease, to be an "exotic disease". Clause 4 inserts a new section 9C and provides that a branding device or tag may not be sold or offered for sale without the written authorisation of the Secretary. Clause 8 amends section 96 of the Act to provide that the offence of non-compliance with Part 6 (Payment of Stamp Duty) of the Act applies to any stamp duty payable under Part 6, and not just limited to cattle duty and pig duty. he amendment further provides for an offence of not properly endorsing stamp duty as having been paid by applying it to statements as well as other documents and invoices. Clause 10 expands the regulation making powers in section 139 of the Act to accommodate the new section 9C and to provide certain livestock inspection and examination information be forwarded to the Secretary. Clause 12 amends the Plant Health and Plant Products Act 1995 to allow action to be taken to prevent the spread of fireblight, a plant disease, by the destruction and control of the movement of bees, honey, hives etc contaminated with fireblight. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech:- "In dealing with the occurrence of fire blight in Victoria last year, it became necessary to deal with honey bees potentially contaminated with the fire blight agent. The Plant Health and Plant Products Act 1995 is being amended to ensure that contaminated bees will be dealt with under the Act for disease control purposes." Clause 13 amends the Stamps Act 1958. The Committee makes no further comment. TRANSFER OF LAND (SINGLE REGISTER) BILL 2.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 13 May 1998 by the Honourable Marie Tehan MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. 2.2 The Bill amends the Transfer of Land Act 1958 to further streamline procedures for the conversion of general law land and to make consequential amendments to the Property Law Act 1958. At present 3% of the area of the State is held under the old system of general law land. The Bill provides a means for the complete elimination of privately owned general law land. When this is achieved all owners of land will have the benefits afforded by the Torrens system title. The Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech:- "It is widely acknowledged that the title to general law land is less marketable and less acceptable as security that a Torrens system title. There are several reasons for this. First, ownership is not guaranteed by the State. Second, it is expensive to trace and gather together the records of the complete series of transactions with the property. Third, since the advent of the Subdivision Act 1988, general law land cannot be subdivided without first being converted to the Torrens system Today, there remain an estimated 35,000 parcels of land, representing approximately 3% of the area of this state, which do not have the benefit of the simpler and State guaranteed Torrens system. This Bill provides for the complete elimination of privately owned general law land. When this is achieved, all owners of land will have the benefit of a Torrens system title." 2.3 Clause 6 is the substantive provision which substitutes a new Part II (Divisions 1-4) into the Transfer of Land Act 1958 (the Act). The new section 9 imposes a duty on the Registrar of Titles to bring all alienated land under the operation of the Principal Act and specifies how land may be brought under the operation of the Principal Act. Section 10 identifies the categories of persons entitled to have land brought under the operation of the Act. Section 11 provides that certain leasehold land may be brought under the operation of the Act. Clauses 2123 make amendments to the Property Law Act 1958. In respect to Clause 22 the Committee notes the comments in the Second Reading Speech:- "The Bill repeals the land dealings registration provisions in the Property Law Act 1958 and provides that no document affecting land may be registered under that Act. This change will require any party dealing in general law land who desires registration to proceed under the Transfer of Land Act 1958." Clause 24 provides for consequential amendments to sixty-eight (68) Acts as specified in the Schedule. The Committee makes no further comment. INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF PRISONERS (VICTORIA) BILL 3.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 29 April 1988 by the Honourable Bill McGrath MP with the Honourable Tom Reynolds MP. 3.2 - Committees report The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1988 on 12 May 1998. The relevant extract of the Committees letter to the Minister on 13 May 1998 is set out:- "Clause 2 provides that Part 1 of the Act comes into operation upon receiving the Royal Assent, and the remaining provisions of the Act come into force upon proclamation. The operation of the Act is left open-ended and regrettably there was no explanation accompanying the Explanatory Memorandum as to why this should be so. The Committee requests your advice as to why it was necessary to depart from the standard practice to fix a period of days or months after Royal Assent at which time the remaining provisions of the Act come into operation." 3.3 - Ministers response "I refer to your letter of 13 May 1998 querying the departure in the International Transfer of Prisoners (Victoria) Bill 1998 from the standard practice of setting a fixed period after Royal Assent after which any unproclaimed provisions of the Act come into force. You are correct in noting that the legislation is part of a Commonwealth and State government scheme and that this is the reason why the provisions of the Act other than Part 1 will come into effect only upon proclamation. It may be some time yet before all State governments have passed the necessary legislation and before administrative arrangements are in place that will allow for the implementation of the international transfer scheme. It is intended that Commonwealth and State legislation will be proclaimed simultaneously when all these matters are settled. It is for this reason that there is no set period after which unproclaimed provisions in the Act will come into force." MELBOURNE AND OLYMPIC PARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL 4.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 22 April 1998 by the Honourable Marie Tehan MP with the Honourable Phil Gude MP. 4.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 of 1998 on 12 May 1998. The relevant extract is set out:- "The Committee will write to the Minister concerning any current or identifiable users that may have interests or rights affected by the application of the section 85 provision." The Committee wrote to the Minister on 12 May 1998. The relevant extract is as follows:- "Clause 5 inserts new sections 25E and 25F and make provision for the power to excise additional land from Yarra Park and from Public Park Reserve. Clause 6 states that it is the intention of section 26, as amended by the Bill, that no compensation be payable by the Crown in respect of any act or matter or thing done under or arising out of sections 25E or 25F of the Act. Clause 6 further provides that it is the intention of section 26 as amended by the Bill to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975. The Committee notes the passage from the Second Reading Speech: The existence of any interests and rights, and claims for compensation based on them or on the former uses of the land, could delay or prevent a change in the use of the land that is for the benefit of the community as a whole. The Committee seeks your advice as to the nature and extent of identified current or former users of the land that may be disadvantaged or effected by the section 85 provision." 4.3 - Ministers response "Thank you for your letter of 12 May 1998 seeking advice regarding the provision to vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 contained in the Melbourne and Olympic Parks (Amendment) Bill. In response to your query, it is my understanding that there are no current or former users of the land subject to the Bill that may be disadvantaged or affected by the section 85 provision. The proposed development at the National Tennis Centre is to straddle the land subject to the Bill and the existing "national tennis centre land" as defined by the Melbourne and Olympic Parks Act 1985. The Act already contains a section 85 provision that affects the "national tennis centre land" and it was therefore considered appropriate that the provision should extend to the land subject to the Bill." STATE TAXATION (AMENDMENT) BILL 5.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 22 April 1998 by the Honourable Alan Stockdale MP with the Honourable Jeff Kennett MP. 5.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 on 12 May 1998. The Committee wrote to the Minister on 12 May 1998. The relevant extract is as follows:- "Clause 6 inserts into the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 definitions of coastal waters of Victoria and Victoria for the purposes of that Act The effect of the amendments extends the jurisdiction of the State to encompass the coastal waters in consequence of the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 (Cth). Clause 2 deems that the amendment came into operation on 1 January 1998. The Committee requests your advice as to why it is necessary to retrospectively apply the operation of this amendment to the Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 to 1 January 1998. The Committee would appreciate your response as soon as possible." 5.3 - Ministers response "Thank you for your letter concerning amendments to the Payroll Tax Act 1971 contained in the State Taxation Amendment Bill 1998. The amendments to which your letter refers are intended to correct an anomaly by making it clear that work performed within Victorian coastal waters and the adjacent area beyond is subject to payroll tax, and not eligible for the exemption provided for work performed wholly outside Australia (that is, in another country). Payroll tax was previously collected in respect of wages for services performed in Victorian coastal waters and adjacent area. However, an advice from the Solicitor-General revealed that the Act in its current form had no operation for wages earned in those areas. The present amendment enables payroll tax to be collected from 1998 onwards in keeping with the Governments original intention. The decision was made in December last year that the measure would take effect from 1 January 1998 only on the basis that the taxpayers and industry association affected by the measure would be notified of the legislative change before the commencement date.
In all cases, the advice was faxed to the recipient, to ensure that it was received promptly. A copy of the attachment sent out with each letter is included, along with an acknowledgment from the Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association (APPEA) detailing the further distribution of the advice from the State Revenue Office. I trust that this will satisfy the committee that extensive effort was undertaken by the Government to alert those taxpayers affected by the change prior to its commencement date." CATCHMENT AND LAND PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL 6.1 The Bill was introduced into the Legislative Assembly on 28 April 1998 by the Honourable Marie Tehan MP with the Honourable Robin Cooper MP. 6.2 The Committee reported on the Bill in Alert Digest No. 4 on 12 May 1998. The relevant extract is set out:- "The Committee notes that the proposed sections 114 and 115 operate retrospectively. The Committee will write to the Minister to request information concerning any persons rights that may be detrimentally effected by the retrospective validation of actions taken by certain authorities as a consequence of these amendments, and how a right of appeal would be dealt with or provided for in relation to a person so effected." 6.3 The Committee wrote to the Minister on 12 May 1998. The Minister responded by way of two letters dated 20 May 1998 and 24 June 1998. The Ministers responses are set out respectively as follows:- 20 May 1998 "I refer to your letter of 12 May 1998 concerning the above Bill. The construction of the clause to which you refer has been drafted on the advice of Parliamentary Counsel. It is premised on the view that it is preferable to be as specific as possible in drafting a clause of this form, so as to deal with all possible actions which could conceivably be taken by a body of this type, rather than by preparing a generalised authorisation. Prior to approving this Bill for introduction, inquiries were made as to whether the actions listed had been, or could have been, taken. I am advised that certain actions such as entry onto land could well have been taken because of the normal routine operational requirements of weather authorities. However my inquiries have not elicited any grounds for believing that any person may be detrimentally affected or disadvantaged by this clause." 24 June 1998 "Thank you for your letter of 12 May 1998 seeking clarification in relation to avenues of appeal or redress available to persons affected by clause 12 of the above Bill. When Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs) were established throughout non metropolitan Victoria on 1 July 1997, they took over the functions of existing waterway management authorities (WMAs). The functions and powers of WMAs provided under the Water Act 1989 were then available to the CMAs. As a result of questions raised about the process for the establishment of the CMAs it was considered appropriate to validate their establishment and appointment as Authorities under the Water Act and to validate actions undertaken by them under the Water Act. This is the purpose of clause 12 of the above Bill. In addition to the functions and powers provided to CMAs under the Water Act (which were previously available to the WMAs), the Water Act also provides numerous checks and balances via opportunities for independent review of decisions or actions by a CMA. For example:
The avenues for review continue to be available to any person affected by decisions or actions of the CMAs. The Catchment and Land Protection (Amendment) Bill 1998 has not altered this situation." Committee Room
|