Alert Digest No. 4 of 2001
Tuesday, 1 May 2001
Auction
Sales (Repeal) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. A. Haermeyer MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Consumer Affairs, Hon M. Thomson MLC
Purpose
The Bill repeals the Auction Sales Act 1958
(the Act) and makes a number of consequential amendments to other Acts.
The Committee notes the following extracts from the Second Reading
Speech
The Bill implements the government's response to the recommendations
of the national competition review of the Auction Sales Act 1958 (the Act) by repealing
that Act and making the necessary consequential amendments to certain other Acts as a
result of the repeal. The Act provides for the licensing of auctioneers of goods including
livestock.
The review concluded that the benefits of licensing auctioneers of
goods are outweighed by the costs.
The repeal will remove a cumbersome and outmoded licensing regime,
which provides no real benefit to those engaging auctioneers or those buying at auction.
A savings provision in the Bill requires records of livestock kept
under the Act to be preserved under the Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 to maintain the
benefits of record-keeping requirements in terms of tracking and controlling livestock
disease.
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. The provisions in the Bill come into operation on 1 January
2002.
[3]. Repeals the Act.
[4]. Substitutes section 13B(2)(a) of the Estate Agents Act 1980 to
specifically set out the categories of statutory officers who are exempt from the
requirement to be licensed as real estate agents under that Act.
[7]. Inserts a new section 144 into the Livestock Disease Control
Act 1994 which saves the records of cattle sales kept under section 35 of the Act.
[8]. Repeals section 5(7) of the Meat Industry Act 1993
which refers to the Act.
[13]. Amends section 29(5) of the Summary Offences Act 1966
by removing the reference to the Act.
The Committee makes no further comment.
Benefit Associations (Repeal) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. R. Cameron MLA
Portfolio Responsibility: Attorney-General, The Hon. R. Hulls MLA
Purpose
The Bill repeals the Benefit
Associations Act 1958 (the Act).
The Committee notes the following extracts from the Second
Reading Speech
The Benefit Associations Act 1958 is based on the Benefit
Associations Act 1951. The 1951 Act was introduced to combat a perceived lack of
regulation of prepaid benefit schemes. In particular, there was a perception of abuse of
pre-paid funeral benefit schemes
The Benefit Associations Act 1958 applies to associations (whether
incorporated or unincorporated) which undertake or carry on the business of sickness,
hospital, medical or funeral benefits. The Act regulates these associations essentially by
providing for registration of associations, separate trust funds for contributions and
close supervision of the rules of each association. The Act requires these associations to
be registered, unless exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 of the Act.
However, no associations have ever been registered under either the
1958 Act or the 1951 Act that preceded it. Instead, a series of exemptions from the Acts
were granted to various associations, some unconditionally, but mostly with a number of
conditions.
An examination of these exempted associations reveals why the Benefit
Associations Act 1958 is now redundant.
Seven organisations that were conditionally or unconditionally exempted
from the Act are also registered under the Commonwealth National Health Act 1953 and are
supervised by the Private Health Insurance Administration Council.
The Benefit Associations Act 1958 has also been rendered obsolete and
unnecessary by the operation of a number of newer regulatory schemes. In relation to
funeral funds, the Victorian Funerals (Pre-Paid Money) Act 1993 established a newer regime
and is the more appropriate regime for continued regulation of funeral prepayment schemes.
Also exempt from the Benefit Associations Act are certain nominated
life insurance companies and all insurance companies (other than life companies)
authorised to carry on insurance business under the Commonwealth Insurance Act 1973.
Insurance companies and insurance agents are now regulated under
Commonwealth law by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. The Bill comes into operation on the day after Royal Assent.
[3]. Repeals the Act which applied to associations (whether
incorporated or unincorporated) undertaking or carrying on the business of sickness,
hospital, medical or funeral benefits in Victoria. The Act is obsolete and no associations
have ever been registered under the Act.
[4]. Repeals section 20 of the Funerals (Pre-Paid Money) Act 1993
which provides that nothing in that Act affects the operation of the Act.
[5]. Makes a consequential amendment to section 17(3)(a) of the
Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Act 1999 by removing the reference to the Act.
The Committee makes no further comment.
Electricity Industry Acts (Further Amendment) Bill
Introduced: 3 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 4 April 2001
House: Legislative Council
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. C. Board MLC
Portfolio Responsibility: Treasurer, Hon. J. Brumby MLA
Purpose
The Bill amends the Electricity
Industry Act 2000 (the Act) and the Electricity Safety Act 1998. The
Bill
clarifies VENCorp's powers and functions in relation to electricity
demand management and the ability of VENCorp to recover its costs in respect of that task,
modifies the operation of the cross-ownership provisions of the
Electricity Industry Act 2000 in relation to new generation projects
makes provision for the establishment of a deemed contract between
electricity distribution companies and retail customers.
clarifies the scope of the obligation created under the retailer of
last resort scheme and modifies the scope of Government's powers to make Orders in Council
in relation to metrology procedures.
amends the Electricity Safety Act 1998 improve the
operation of the electricity safety management scheme provisions and the provisions
dealing with bushfire mitigation plans.
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. Other than sections 5 and 10 the provisions in the Bill
commence on the day after Royal Assent. Sections 5 and 10 commence on proclamation but not
later than by 31 December 2002.
[5]. Inserts a new section 40A into the Act dealing with deemed
distribution contracts. The new section 40A allows a distribution company, subject to the
conditions of its licence, to give notice of terms and conditions applying in respect of
the distribution or supply of electricity by that company to retail customers or a class
of customers. The terms and conditions must be approved by the Office of the
Regulator-General.
[6]. Broadens power to make an Order in Council specifying requirements
for the provision, installation and maintenance of metering installations to be used to
facilitate arrangements whereby a customer of one retailer elects to become a customer of
another retailer or relating to the settlement of the wholesale electricity market.
[9]. Inserts a new section 68(8A) dealing with the general prohibition
with respect to cross-ownership in relation to a generation or distribution company from
holding a controlling interest in another generation company. The new provision further
clarifies exemptions to the general prohibition.
[10]. Inserts a new section 79A which expands VENCorp's power to manage
electricity demand.
Amendments to the Electricity Safety Act 1998
[11 and 12]. Contain amendments to improve the operation of the
electricity safety management scheme provisions and the provisions dealing with bushfire
mitigation plans. [11] Amends section 83A(1) obligations on electricity suppliers to
prepare and submit proposals for mitigation of bushfire danger in respect of electrical
lines and electrical installations so that the obligations extend to overhead private
electric lines.
The Committee makes no further comment.
Food (Amendment) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio Responsibility: Minister for Health
Purpose
The Bill amends the Food Act 1984
(the Act) to
give effect to the core provisions of the Model Food Act
endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments; and
make further provision with respect to food safety programs; and
improve the enforcement provisions of that Act.
The Committee notes the extracts from the Second Reading Speech
Broadly, the Bill amends the current Act in three ways. First, it
introduces the core provisions of the Model Food Bill. Second, it introduces template food
safety programs, provides for the registration of templates which some proprietors may
choose to use in preparing a food safety program and removes the requirement for these
proprietors to have their food safety program audited. Third, it amends provisions with
respect to registration procedures and the obligations on local government as the
registration authority.
The Bill also redefines a number of offences with respect to the sale
of unsafe and unsuitable food and to false representations about food.
The more serious offences, which are indictable offences triable
summarily, involve a person in handling food in a manner that a person knows, or should
know, will render the food unsafe, or selling food that a person knows or should know is
unsafe.
The Bill also provides that it is an indictable offence to falsely
describe food or to sell food that a person knows or should know is falsely described when
the likely result will be physical harm to a consumer who relies on the description.
The Bill also creates less serious forms of all these offences,
together with offences of engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in the conduct of a
food business, and of non-compliance with the food standards code.
The Bill also codifies defences and, in particular, contains a defence
of due diligence which allows a person, including a corporation, to prove that they took
all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of
the offence.
In line with the Model Bill, the Bill significantly raises the
penalties for offences with respect to food. This approach was the subject of national
consultation. The penalties range from a maximum of two years imprisonment and/or a fine
of $100 000 for an individual, or $500 000 in the case of a corporation for the more
serious indictable offences.
For summary offences, the penalties are a maximum of $40 000 for an
individual and $200 000 in the case of a corporation.
These provisions are a reflection of the seriousness with which this
government regards the sale of unsafe and harmful food to the public. More serious
breaches can be tried before a jury. These indictable offences are also triable summarily.
Other provisions in the Bill reflect the emergency powers to be held by
the Secretary, agreed to in the Model Bill. These emergency powers are similar to the
current powers under the Food Act and they allow the Secretary to make a range of orders
in circumstances where the order is intended to prevent or reduce the possibility of a
serious danger to the public or to mitigate the adverse consequences of a serious danger
to the public.
The Model Bill includes provisions for compensation arising from an
improper use of the Secretary's emergency powers. It has been agreed that the forum to
determine such issues will be the Magistrates Court, where all other proceedings under the
current act take place. Should the claim for compensation exceed the monetary limitation
of the Magistrates Court it will go to the appropriate higher court.
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. The provisions of the Bill come into operation on proclamation
but not later than by 1 January 2002.
[3]. Inserts objects into the Act, including to ensure food for sale is
both safe and suitable for human consumption; to prevent misleading conduct in connection
with the sale of food; and to provide for the application in Victoria of the Food
Standards Code.
[5]. Inserts new sections 4A to 4G into the Act setting out the meaning
of various terms used in the Act, including those of "food", "food
business", "unsafe" food and "unsuitable" food. The former
expressions of food which is unfit for human consumption and adulterated
food are now redundant.
[7]. Inserts new sections 6A and 6B in the Act to provide that certain
Parts of the Act do not apply to primary food production or water suppliers.
[8]. Substitutes Part 2 of the Act.
New sections 8 and 8A creates offences respectively for a person to
knowingly or where a person ought reasonable to know, to handle food intended for sale in
a manner that will render the food unsafe.
New section 9 and 9A create offences to sell food which a person
knows, or should know, is unsafe.
New sections 10 and 10A create offences to falsely describe food or
to sell food that a person knows, or should know, is falsely described, when the likely
result will be physical harm to a consumer who relies on the description.
For sections 8, 9 and 10 the maximum penalty applicable for these
offences is 2 years imprisonment or a fine of $100 000, or both, for an individual, or a
fine of $500 000 in the case of a corporation. For the offences under section 8A, 9A and
10A there are only monetary penalties set at 25% below the more serious offences of acting
knowingly in each case.
New sections 11 to 16 create less serious forms of offences, such as
handling and sale of unsafe, or unsuitable food or food not complying with the
purchasers demand, sale of unfit equipment or packaging or labelling material,
offences of engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in the conduct of a food
business, and of non-compliance with the Food Standards Code. The maximum penalty for
these summary offences is $40 000 in the case of an individual, and $200 000 in the case
of a corporation.
New section 17 provides that a proprietor of a food business must
prominently display his or her name on the premises.
New Section 17A deals with false descriptions of food.
New section 17B applies the provisions of Part 2 of the Act to food
sold or intended to be sold outside Victoria.
New sections 17C to 17H provide for defences to the penalty
provisions, including 17E, the defence of due diligence.
[11]. Removes the requirement on local councils to be satisfied that a
food safety program is adequate as a condition of registration.
Food Safety Programs
[12]. Substitutes section 19D of the Act with new sections 19D,
19DA, 19DB and 19DC.
New section 19D, containing a definition of a food safety program.
New section 19DA, containing a definition of food safety program
template being a registered document containing instructions to a food business proprietor
to enable compliance with new section 19D.
New section 19DB, provides that the Secretary may register food safety
program templates and may specify the classes of food business for which the template is
suitable.
New section 19DC, defining a standard food safety program as one
written in accordance with a suitable template.
[13]. Substitutes a new section 19E of the Act imposing various
obligations on the proprietor of a food business in relation to food safety programs.
[15]. Replaces the definition of a food safety instructor with that of
a food safety supervisor. A food safety supervisor must meet food safety competency
standards, be able to identify hazards and be able to supervise other people handling
food.
[17]. Inserts a new section 19H that provides for the inspection by
local government of food premises using standard food safety programs, and the action to
be taken in the event of non-compliance with the program.
New section 19I provides for the private audit of food premises that
use non-standard food safety programs, and the action to be taken in the event of
non-compliance.
[19]. The Secretary may exempt specified food proprietors from the
obligation to have a food safety supervisor in relation to a food premises.
[22]. Substitutes new sections 35 to 37 for former sections 35, 35A, 36
and 37 and provides that the proprietor of a food business must register all food premises
at which the business is operated with the council of the municipal district in which the
premises is located, and that a food business may not operate in those premises if the
registration is suspended.
[23]. Provides for an exemption to the registration requirement for
premises licensed under the Dairy Act 2000.
[24]. Substitutes new section 38A of the Act and inserts a new section
38B requiring proprietors applying for registration to provide a copy of their food safety
programs with their applications and to indicate if the premises has a food safety program
created with a template.
Emergency Orders
[27]. Substitutes a new Part 7 of the Act dealing with emergency
powers.
There are provisions that give the Secretary powers to make emergency
orders, specify the nature of the orders that can be made. The provisions provide for
penalties for failure to comply, and for compensation payable in the case of an
unwarranted order being made under 44D.
New section 44 provides that an order may be made by the Secretary
where it is necessary to prevent or reduce the possibility of a serious danger to public
health.
An Order may
require the publication of warnings that a particular food is unsafe;
prohibit the cultivation, taking, harvesting or obtaining, from a
specified area, of a particular food;
prohibit a particular food from being advertised or sold;
direct that a particular food be recalled and specify the manner in
which, and the period within which, the recall is to be conducted;
direct that a particular food be impounded, isolated, destroyed or
otherwise disposed of;
prohibit the carrying on of an activity in relation to a particular
food , or permit the carrying on of the activity in accordance with conditions specified
in the order;
requiring the taking and analysis of samples of the food or of water
or soil or any other thing that is part of the environment in which that activity is
carried on in relation to the food;
specify methods of analysis (not inconsistent with any methods
prescribed by the Food Standards Code) of any samples required to be taken in accordance
with the order.
Recall Order
New section 44B deals with recall orders. A person who is bound by
a recall order is liable for any reasonable costs incurred in connection with the recall
order.
New section 44C provides that an order is binding and ceases to have
effect at the expiration of 90 days after the day on which it takes effect unless it is
sooner revoked or re-issued.
Compensation
New section 44D provides that a person bound by an order who
suffers loss as a result of the making of the order may apply to the Secretary for
compensation if the person considers that there were insufficient grounds for the making
of the order.
An applicant who is dissatisfied with a determination by the Secretary
as to the refusal to pay compensation or as to the amount of compensation may apply to the
Magistrates' Court for a review of the determination. If the amount of compensation sought
exceeds the jurisdictional limit of the Magistrates' Court, the application is to be made
to the Supreme Court.
New 44E provides that it is an offence to fail to comply with an
emergency order.
New section 44F provides that it is not necessary for the Secretary to
give any person affected by an order a chance to be heard before such an emergency order
is made.
| The Committee notes that by section 44F the Secretary is not bound
to give a person who may be affected by an emergency order a chance to be heard before the
order is made, but has a discretion to do so. On the face of the provision this may be
considered to breach the principles of natural justice and may therefore be in breach of
section 4D(a)(i) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968. The
Committee notes that emergency nature of such orders affecting important matters
concerning public health and also the existence of compensation provisions for cases where
orders are made on insufficient grounds.
The Committee is of the opinion that in legislation of this
nature there must be a balance struck between public health and safety and individual
rights. Balancing these two objectives the Committee believes that the provision is not an
undue trespass to rights and freedoms. |
[28]. Inserts a new section 50A to permit alternative verdicts for
serious food offences such that a person charged with a serious offence can be found
guilty of an alternative lesser offence.
[29]. Inserts new sections 52A and 52B to provide for the separate
liability of employees, agents and employers for breaches of the Act or regulations.
In certain circumstances an employer may be deemed to be liable for an
offence committed by an employee. Under the provisions an employer has a defence of
due diligence. An employer may be proceeded against irrespective of a
conviction or proceedings against an employee.
The Committee notes that the provision effectively
deems the actions of an employee to be those of the employer reflecting the legal doctrine
of vicarious liability.
The Committee accepts this deeming provision places a
heavy, but reasonable burden on food business employers for acts of their employees. The
Committee notes the defence of due diligence is available to employers. |
[30]. Inserts a new section 53A allowing a court to award costs and
expenses for proceedings brought under the Act. New section 53B permits a court to order
corrective advertising.
Protection against liability for authorised officers
[31]. Inserts a new section 56 making the Secretary and a local
council liable for the acts or omissions performed in good faith by authorized officers
and employees.
[33]. Inserts transitional provisions to preserve orders made prior to
the passing of the Act.
[34]. Provides for the new indictable offences inserted by the Bill to
be heard summarily under the Magistrates' Court Act 1989.
The Committee makes no further comment.
Health
Services (Health Purchasing Victoria) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Health
Purpose
The Bill amends the Health Services Act
1988 (the Act) in relation to the supply of goods and services to health or
related services, including public hospitals, and establishes Health Purchasing Victoria
(HPV).
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. The provisions in the Bill come into operation on 1 July 2001.
[6]. Amends section 42 of the Act providing the Secretary power to
issue a direction to a public hospital requiring it to appoint HPV as its agent for the
purposes of obtaining or purchasing goods and services. The direction can stipulate the
conditions on which the hospital must appoint HPV as agent.
[7]. Amends section 58 of the Act to permit the Minister to exercise
the powers in section 58 in relation to a public hospital that fails to comply with an HPV
direction or a purchasing policy. Section 58 allows the Minister to censure a registered
agency, suspend admission of patients to the agency, recommend to the Governor in Council
that an administrator of the agency be appointed or recommend to the Governor in Council
that the agency be closed.
Establishment of Health Purchasing Victoria
[8]. Inserts a new Part 6 into the Act comprising new sections 129
to 134N.
New section 129 establishes Health Purchasing Victoria (HPV) and
provides that it is a body corporate with perpetual succession which may sue and be sued
in its corporate name, may acquire, hold and dispose of real and personal property, and
may do and suffer all things that a body corporate may do and suffer.
New section 131 sets out the functions of HPV including to supply and
facilitate access to the supply of goods and services to public hospitals and other health
or related services.
New section 132 sets out the powers of HPV.
New section 134A provides that HPV can exempt a public hospital or
class of public hospitals from the requirement to comply with a purchasing policy.
New section 134D provides for the membership of HPV. The Governor in
Council may also appoint up to 2 additional members who have expertise which the Minister
believes is relevant to the functions of HPV. New section 134E sets out the terms and
conditions of members of HPV.
New section 134F relates to the removal, resignation or vacancy in the
office of an HPV member.
New section 134I relates to direct or indirect conflicts of interest of
HPV members and prohibits improper use of any information acquired as a member of HPV to
obtain a direct or indirect advantage.
New section 134K is a delegation provision
HPV may, by instrument, delegate to a member or an employee of HPV any of its powers
except (a) the power to make, amend or revoke purchasing policies under section
134; (b) this power of delegation.
The Committee accepts that the delegation provision is
appropriate to give effect to the purposes of the Act. |
New section 134L gives the Minister power to issue directions to HPV
about any of its functions or powers, including directions which set limits or controls on
the extent to which HPV can expend and borrow money and enter into contracts and joint
ventures.
The new section 134L also gives the Secretary the power to issue
directions to HPV regarding the terms and conditions on which HPV employs staff.
New section 134N relates to contracts for goods or services entered by
public hospitals before 1 July 2001. A public hospital will not be required to comply with
an HPV direction or purchasing policy to the extent that the direction or policy is
inconsistent with a pre-1 July contract. However, a public hospital will not be able to
vary such a contract or exercise an option to extend or renew such a contract on or after
1 July 2001 unless HPV provides written consent.
The Committee makes no further comment.
Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs Enforcement Measures
) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. P. Batchelor MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Transport
Purpose
The Bill amends the Road Safety Act
1986 (the Act), the Marine Act 1988 and other Acts related to
alcohol and drugs enforcement. The Bill
Provides for a new 'accompanying driver offence'. This will set a
legal BAC limit of 05. The Bill will require an
accompanying driver to produce their licence and submit to testing, in the same way as if
the person were driving the vehicle. The Bill does not change the zero BAC requirement for
professional driving instructors.
Provides power for the police to be able to administer an evidential
breath alcohol test as a preliminary step in the drug driving assessment process. The Bill
will make it clear that the police can do this in all cases.
Makes amendments to permit certificates relating to blood and urine
samples taken outside the three-hour period to be admitted in evidence. Defendants still
have the right to challenge the evidence contained in the certificate in court.
Amendments to the Marine Act 1988 relating to BAC
limits for boat operators.
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. Part 1 and sections 17, 24, 25 and 26 will come into operation
on the day after Royal Assent. The remaining provisions come into force on proclamation
but not later than by 1 February 2002.
Amendments to the Road Safety Act 1986
[3]. Inserts a definition of "accompanying driver
offence" into section 3(1) of the Act.
[4]. Amends section 48 of the Act. A new section 48(1AAA) to provide
that, for the purposes of the alcohol and drug provisions of the Act, an instructor (other
than a commercial instructor) is to be taken to be in charge of the vehicle when
accompanying a learner driver. New section 48(1AB) provides that a person who is actually
driving or in charge of a vehicle remains subject to the alcohol and drug provisions of
the Act despite the fact that an accompanying driver is present.
[5]. Amends section 49 of the Act to alter the method of expressing
blood alcohol concentration for driving offences. Presently, section 49 prohibits blood
alcohol concentrations of "more than" the prescribed level.
Note
In the Supreme Court case of Blanksby v Barnes [1998]
2V.R. 164, the Court held that, as the Act expresses prescribed blood alcohol
concentration with two decimal places, readings to the third decimal place should be
disregarded. Under this interpretation, a person is not in breach of the provisions even
though that person's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is more than the prescribed amount
unless the excess is 01 or more. Thus a reading of 059 would be interpreted as a reading of 05.
To redress this situation, the proposed amendments alter the
definitions of offences under section 49 by replacing references to a BAC of "more
than" the prescribed level with references to a BAC of the prescribed level
itself, or higher. This means that the relevant offence is committed if a BAC is at the
prescribed level of 05. |
[6]. Also amends section 49 of the Act to fix a penalty for an
"accompanying driver offence", that is, for a breach of the alcohol or drug
provisions committed by a person instructing a learner driver but who is not a commercial
instructor. The amendments will prescribe a penalty of up to 5 penalty units ($500).
[7]. Makes consequential amendments amends section 50 of the Act,
dealing with the cancellation of driving licences or permits of persons found guilty of
certain alcohol and drug offences and their disqualification from obtaining further
licences or permits. The purpose of the amendments is to express BAC, for these purposes,
as being at the stated levels instead of as "more than" the stated levels
as in [5] above.
[8]. Also amends section 50 of the Act so that a person who is found
guilty of an "accompanying driver offence" is not subject to licence
cancellation or disqualification under that section.
[9]. Inserts a new sub-section 53(1E) prescribing a BAC of zero for
motor cyclists during the first year in which they are licensed to drive motor cycles. At
present, a first year motor cyclist is not restricted to zero BAC if he or she holds a
motor car licence and the zero BAC period has expired in relation to that licence. The
clause also amends the expression of zero BAC to any concentration of alcohol
present in the blood of that person'.
[10]. Inserts a new section 53(1)(ab) into the Act to authorise police
officers to administer a preliminary breath test to any person in a motor vehicle if the
driver or person in charge does not hold a licence appropriate to that vehicle. The
accompanying person may have committed an "accompanying driver offence". This
new section will enable police to require other persons in the vehicle to undergo a
preliminary breath test in the same way as the actual driver or person in charge.
[11]. Amends section 55 of the Act to enable breath analysis tests to
be administered to a person who is undergoing an assessment for drug impairment.
[11(3)] amends section 55(9A) to enable a police officer to require a
blood sample from a person who had undergone breath analysis under the preceding
provisions where the person was unable to provide a sufficient breath sample or because
the machine malfunctioned. Such blood samples could only be required on identical grounds
to those under the existing alcohol provisions.
Note
A health professional that takes a blood sample in accordance with
section 55(9A) has immunity from suit under section 55(9E). This immunity from suit will
also apply to a health professional who takes a blood sample for the purposes of a drug
assessment under section 55(9A) as amended by clause 11(3). See also the notes to clause
16: It is intended that the amended section 55 will alter or vary section 85 of the
Constitution Act 1975 in relation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction. |
Immunity from suit
A health professional that takes a blood sample in accordance with
section 55(9A) has immunity from suit under section 55(9E). This immunity from suit will
also apply to a health professional who takes a blood sample for the purposes of a drug
assessment under section 55(9A) as amended by [11(3)]. See also [16] for section 85 of the
Constitution Act 1975 provision relevant to this clause in relation to the
Supreme Court's jurisdiction.
[12]. Inserts section 55B(1A) to prevent a blood sample being required
for the purposes of drug testing from a person who has already provided a blood sample for
alcohol testing under section 55(9A) in relation to the same circumstances. Section 57(2)
of the Act already provides that the results of such a test are admissible as evidence in
proceedings for alcohol and drug offences.
[13 and 14]. Amends sections 57 and 57A of the Act so as to enable
certified results of tests of blood samples to be used as evidence even if the sample is
taken more than three hours after driving. At the moment the only way in which evidence of
the test result can be given if the sample was taken more than three hours after driving
is by calling the analyst who conducted the test to give evidence.
[15]. Amends section 89C of the Act, which deals with the cancellation
of drivers' licences or permits in certain cases. The amendments express references to BAC
in terms of being at, in addition to being above, the specified concentration. See also
[5].
Report to the Parliament pursuant section
4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 concerning a repeal alteration
or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.
[16]. Inserts a new section 94A(3) into the Act.
The new section declares that it is the intention of section 55(9E), to the extent that
the section applies in respect of anything done under section 55(9A) as amended by [11] of
the Bill to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1986.
The proposed alteration or variation of the Supreme Court's
jurisdiction relates to the immunity from suit that section 55(9E) of the Act confers on
health professionals who take blood samples for the purposes of alcohol and drug tests
under section 55(9A).
Immunity from suit already exists in relation to the taking of blood
samples under the existing alcohol provisions. The amendments to section 55(9A) proposed
by [11] will authorise the taking of a blood sample from a person who was initially
assessed for drugs. Consequently, the scope of the immunity conferred by section 55(9E)
will be indirectly extended to cover these new cases.
To ensure that the immunity conferred is effective, it is necessary to
alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 in relation to the
Supreme Court's jurisdiction. This is consistent with previous legislation relating to the
section 55(9E) immunity.
The Committee notes the section 85 statement made by the Minister in
the Second Reading Speech
Under section 55(9A) of the Road Safety Act 1986, a person may be
required to provide a sample of blood for analysis for its alcohol content if that person
could not provide a sufficient breath sample or because the machine malfunctioned. This
Bill proposes to insert a new section 55(2AA), which will allow police to require a breath
sample from a person undergoing drug assessment. Consequently, the Bill also extends the
scope of section 55(9A) to apply to the taking of a blood sample from a person who has
been required to provide a breath sample under new subsection (2AA) if that breath sample
cannot be tested. The circumstances in which such a blood sample may be taken, and the
procedures which govern the taking of the blood sample, will otherwise be identical with
those relating to persons who are being assessed under section 55.
Section 55(9E) presently provides that no action lies against a
registered medical practitioner or an approved health professional in respect of anything
properly and necessarily done in the course of taking a blood sample in accordance with
section 55(9A). The scope of this immunity from action is effectively extended by this
Bill because blood samples may be taken in an additional class of cases.
Clause 16 of the Bill proposes to insert a new section 94A(3) into the
Road Safety Act 1986. That new section declares that it is the intention of section 55(9E)
of the act to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 to the extent
necessary to prevent the bringing of an action of the kind referred to in section 55(9E).
The reason for this proposed alteration or variation is as follows.
It is in the interests of road safety and the general public to prevent
or deter persons who are impaired by alcohol or drugs from driving motor vehicles. The
enforcement system in relation to alcohol and drug impairment of motorists depends in part
on the cooperation of health professionals in taking and analysing blood samples in
accordance with the legislation. For these reasons, health professionals should be immune
from legal action in relation to things properly and necessarily done in taking blood
samples. The proposed alteration or variation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction is
necessary to ensure that the immunity conferred by section 55(9E) is effective.
In this context, it should also be noted that the Bill proposes to
prohibit a second blood sample being required under section 55B if a sample has already
been obtained under section 55. The taking of blood samples is invasive and should be
minimised. There should be no need to take a second sample. The first sample can be tested
for both alcohol and drugs and the existing section 57(2) enables such test results to be
used in evidence in relevant legal proceedings.
| The Committee has examined the proposed section 85 of the Constitution Act
1975 clause and notes the Ministers statement in the Second Reading Speech and
accepts that the provision is consistent with the purposes of the Bill. |
[17]. Amends section 16(1) of the Road Safety (Further Amendment)
Act 1991 (not yet in force). When that section comes into force, it will insert a
new section 89C(1A) into the Act. This will provide for automatic suspension for one month
of the licence of a person to whom a traffic infringement notice is issued for certain
drink-driving offences whilst driving or in charge of a large vehicle. This amendment is
consequential on other amendments made in the Act so as to express BAC at the stated level
of 05 instead of as "more than" that level.
See [5] above.
Amendments to the Marine Act 1988 (the Act)
[18]. Inserts a new definition of "accompanying operator
offence" into section 3(1) of the Marine Act 1988.
[19]. Inserts a new section 27(1AAA) into the Act to create a similar
offence to the "accompanying operator offence" in the Road Safety Act 1986.
[20]. Amends section 28(1) of the Act to alter the definitions of
certain offences under that section by replacing references to a prescribed BAC of "more
than" the prescribed concentration with references to BAC of the prescribed level
itself, or higher. See also [5].
[21]. Amends section 28 of the Act to fix a penalty for an
"accompanying operator offence" set at 5 penalty units ($500). The clause also
amends section 28(2) and (3) to exempt a person who is found guilty of an
"accompanying driver offence" from liability to the heavier fines and
imprisonment prescribed by those sub-sections.
[22]. Inserts a new section 29(1)(ab) into the Act to authorise a
police officer to administer a preliminary breath test to any person found in a vessel
under way if the person in charge is required to be accompanied by a licensed operator.
[23] Amends section 32 of the Act to enable certified results of tests
of blood samples to be used as evidence even if the sample is taken more than three hours
after operating a vessel. See also [13 and 14].
[24]. Amends section 3 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000,
which when in force will amend section 3(1) of the Act to insert a new definition of
"prescribed BAC" in place of a definition that was to have been inserted by the Marine
(Amendment) Act 2000.
The new definition will fix BAC for the purposes of the Act as in the
case of persons under 21, any concentration of alcohol at all, and any other persons, 05.
[25]. Amends section 9 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000,
(not yet in force) to insert a new section 28A(4) into the Act. The effect of the new
section 28A(4) will be that a person who is found guilty of an "accompanying operator
offence" is not subject to the licence cancellation or disqualification which would
otherwise apply under that section.
[26]. Amends section 13 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000,
(not yet in force) and will insert section 61BA into the Act to deal with the manner in
which blood alcohol concentration is expressed for the purposes of that section. See also
[5].
The Committee makes no further comment.
Tobacco (Further Amendment) Bill
Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Health
Purpose
The Bill amends the Tobacco Act 1987 (the
Act) and the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2000 (the Amending Act) that are not
yet in force. The main features of the Bill are
All enclosed retail shopping centres in Victoria will now be required
to be smoke free. Currently the provisions only apply to controlled shopping
centres which were declared by Governor in Council order under the Act with the
consent of the owner of the shopping centre;
Retailers will be required to display signs that state it is illegal
to sell tobacco to minors;
The sale of single cigarettes will be prohibited. After the
amendments made by the Bill come into force the minimum purchase of cigarettes will be in
packs of 20;
The advertising of cheap smokes or discount cigarette signs outside
tobacco retail outlets will be prohibited;
Loopholes in the provisions prohibiting the practice of providing
gifts with tobacco products will be eliminated; and
Mobile cigarette sellers will be banned.
Content and Committee comment
[Clauses]
[2]. Part 1, section 16 and Part 3 come into operation on the day
after Royal Assent. Section 8 comes into operation on 1 July 2001. Sections 7, 9, 10, 12,
15 and 17(2) come into operation on 1 October 2001. Sections 3(2), 4, 5, 6 and 11 come
into operation on 1 November 2001. The remaining provisions of the Bill come into
operation on 1 January 2002.
[3]. Repeals the redundant definition of "controlled shopping
centre" as the Act will now apply to all shopping centres as from 1 November 2001.
[4]. Repeals section 3C of the Act which allowed for a retail shopping
centre to be declared to be a shopping centre to which the Act applied.
[5]. Amends section 5C of the Act to create an offence of smoking in an
enclosed area of a retail shopping centre 5 penalty units ($500).
[6]. Substitutes a new section 5D(1) of the Act to create an offence
for the occupier of an enclosed area of a retail shopping centre if smoking occurs in that
area 5 penalty units ($500).
[8]. Amends section 7 of the Act to prohibit the supply of any
non-tobacco products or other benefits in connection with the promotion or the sale of a
tobacco product.
[9]. Inserts a new section 13A in the Act to prohibit the mobile
selling of tobacco products, and also prohibits authorising another person to do so.
[10]. Amends section 14 of the Act to extend the ban on selling
cigarettes in a package containing less than 20. The sale of unpackaged cigarettes is
prohibited.
[11]. Substitutes a new section 15B of the Act to impose a requirement
on the owners of retail shopping centres to display no smoking signs.
[12]. Inserts a new 15C(3) of the Act to impose an obligation on
tobacco retailers to display a sign relating to the prohibition on the sale of tobacco
products to persons under the age of 18 years.
[14]. Inserts a new section 13E(2) into the Act to allow inspectors to
inspect and measure a tobacco advertisement without the necessity of a warrant, that is
visible to the customer at any time the relevant premises are open to the public.
Report to the Parliament pursuant section
4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 concerning a repeal alteration
or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.
[16]. Inserts a new section 42B(2) into the Act
to declare that it is the intention of section 42 of the Act as it applies after the
commencement of the various provisions of the Bill to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution
Act 1975.
The Committee notes the following comments from the Second
Reading Speech
I wish to make a statement pursuant to section 85 of the
Constitution Act 1975 about the reasons for altering or varying that section by clause 16
of the Tobacco (Further Amendment) Bill. That clause inserts a new subsection (2) in
section 42B of the Tobacco Act, which states that it is the intention of section 42, as it
will have effect after the amendments come into force, to alter or vary section 85 of the
Constitution Act 1975.
Section 42 of the Tobacco Act provides that an action does not lie
against a person for the failure to do anything that would constitute an offence under the
Act. This was included in the Act when it was first passed in 1987.
The Bill creates a number of new offences. It is necessary that section
42 apply to those offences in the same way that it applies to existing offences.
It would frustrate the purpose of the Act if people felt compelled to
undertake activities that were prohibited by the Bill, such as the mobile selling of
tobacco products, out of fear of some legal action which may be brought against them if
they fail or refuse to do so.
The Committee has examined the proposed section 85 of
the Constitution Act 1975 clause and notes the Ministers statement in the Second
Reading Speech and accepts that the provision is consistent with the purposes of the Bill. |
[17]. Amends the Schedule to the Act to allow for infringement notices
to be issued for offences that prohibit the display of a tobacco product at a place other
than a point of sale; the mobile selling of tobacco products and the sale of cigarettes
that are not in a package containing at least 20 cigarettes.
Amendments to the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2000 (the amending
Act)
[18]. Amends the commencement provision of the amending Act.
Sections 7(1) and 13(1) and (3) of that Act (no-smoking in restaurants and signs in retail
outlets) will still come into operation on 1 July 2001. However, sections 8, 9, 10 and
16(1)(b) (point of sale advertising) will now come into operation on 1 January 2002.
[19]. Makes a number of amendments to section 8 of the Amending Act,
which will amend section 6 of the Act (tobacco advertisements). [19(1) and (2)] ensure
that tobacco products may only be displayed at a point of sale. [19(3)(a)] allows for
tobacco displays at a point of sale and representations of tobacco products on vending
machines, provided that those displays comply with section 6A of the Act. [19(3)(a)] also
allows for notices about tobacco products (price boards) at a point of sale that comply
with the prescribed requirements. [19(3)(b)] allows for the regulations regarding price
tickets to deal with the way in which those price tickets may be displayed. [19(3)(c)]
allows for price tickets on vending machines that meet the prescribed requirements.
[20]. Amends section 9 of the Amending Act which will insert a new
section 6A in the Act to regulate the way in which tobacco products may be displayed at a
point of sale and the way in which representations of tobacco products may be displayed on
vending machines and the way in which tobacco products may be displayed, including the
display of cartons at on-airport duty free shops.
[21]. Amends section 13 of the Amending Act, which will insert a new
section 15A in the Act to deal with no smoking signs that must be displayed in enclosed
restaurants, cafes and dining areas. The amendment requires those signs to meet
requirements to be prescribed.
[22]. Amends section 13(3) of the Amending Act which will insert a new
section 15C in the Act to require the occupier of a retail outlet to display either a
health warning sign or a sign relating to programs assisting in the cessation of smoking.
The revised new section 15C requires those signs to meet requirements to be prescribed.
The Committee accepts that some provisions in the Bill may
impinge on certain rights and freedoms of some members of the community and at the same
time enhance the rights and freedoms of others.
Whether the diminution of any of these rights and freedoms is an undue
trespass is a matter for the Parliament to determine. |
The Committee makes no further comment.
|