Alert Digest No. 4 of 2001
Tuesday, 1 May 2001


Auction Sales (Repeal) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. A. Haermeyer MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Consumer Affairs, Hon M. Thomson MLC

Purpose

The Bill repeals the Auction Sales Act 1958 (the Act) and makes a number of consequential amendments to other Acts.

The Committee notes the following extracts from the Second Reading Speech –

The Bill implements the government's response to the recommendations of the national competition review of the Auction Sales Act 1958 (the Act) by repealing that Act and making the necessary consequential amendments to certain other Acts as a result of the repeal. The Act provides for the licensing of auctioneers of goods including livestock.

The review concluded that the benefits of licensing auctioneers of goods are outweighed by the costs.

The repeal will remove a cumbersome and outmoded licensing regime, which provides no real benefit to those engaging auctioneers or those buying at auction.

A savings provision in the Bill requires records of livestock kept under the Act to be preserved under the Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 to maintain the benefits of record-keeping requirements in terms of tracking and controlling livestock disease.

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. The provisions in the Bill come into operation on 1 January 2002.

[3]. Repeals the Act.

[4]. Substitutes section 13B(2)(a) of the Estate Agents Act 1980 to specifically set out the categories of statutory officers who are exempt from the requirement to be licensed as real estate agents under that Act.

[7]. Inserts a new section 144 into the Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 which saves the records of cattle sales kept under section 35 of the Act.

[8]. Repeals section 5(7) of the Meat Industry Act 1993 which refers to the Act.

[13]. Amends section 29(5) of the Summary Offences Act 1966 by removing the reference to the Act.

The Committee makes no further comment.


Benefit Associations (Repeal) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. R. Cameron MLA
Portfolio Responsibility: Attorney-General, The Hon. R. Hulls MLA

Purpose

The Bill repeals the Benefit Associations Act 1958 (the Act).

The Committee notes the following extracts from the Second Reading Speech –

The Benefit Associations Act 1958 is based on the Benefit Associations Act 1951. The 1951 Act was introduced to combat a perceived lack of regulation of prepaid benefit schemes. In particular, there was a perception of abuse of pre-paid funeral benefit schemes…

The Benefit Associations Act 1958 applies to associations (whether incorporated or unincorporated) which undertake or carry on the business of sickness, hospital, medical or funeral benefits. The Act regulates these associations essentially by providing for registration of associations, separate trust funds for contributions and close supervision of the rules of each association. The Act requires these associations to be registered, unless exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 of the Act.

However, no associations have ever been registered under either the 1958 Act or the 1951 Act that preceded it. Instead, a series of exemptions from the Acts were granted to various associations, some unconditionally, but mostly with a number of conditions.

An examination of these exempted associations reveals why the Benefit Associations Act 1958 is now redundant.

Seven organisations that were conditionally or unconditionally exempted from the Act are also registered under the Commonwealth National Health Act 1953 and are supervised by the Private Health Insurance Administration Council.

The Benefit Associations Act 1958 has also been rendered obsolete and unnecessary by the operation of a number of newer regulatory schemes. In relation to funeral funds, the Victorian Funerals (Pre-Paid Money) Act 1993 established a newer regime and is the more appropriate regime for continued regulation of funeral prepayment schemes.

Also exempt from the Benefit Associations Act are certain nominated life insurance companies and all insurance companies (other than life companies) authorised to carry on insurance business under the Commonwealth Insurance Act 1973.

Insurance companies and insurance agents are now regulated under Commonwealth law by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. The Bill comes into operation on the day after Royal Assent.

[3]. Repeals the Act which applied to associations (whether incorporated or unincorporated) undertaking or carrying on the business of sickness, hospital, medical or funeral benefits in Victoria. The Act is obsolete and no associations have ever been registered under the Act.

[4]. Repeals section 20 of the Funerals (Pre-Paid Money) Act 1993 which provides that nothing in that Act affects the operation of the Act.

[5]. Makes a consequential amendment to section 17(3)(a) of the Financial Sector Reform (Victoria) Act 1999 by removing the reference to the Act.

The Committee makes no further comment.


Electricity Industry Acts (Further Amendment) Bill

Introduced: 3 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 4 April 2001
House: Legislative Council
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. C. Board MLC
Portfolio Responsibility: Treasurer, Hon. J. Brumby MLA

Purpose

The Bill amends the Electricity Industry Act 2000 (the Act) and the Electricity Safety Act 1998. The Bill –

  • clarifies VENCorp's powers and functions in relation to electricity demand management and the ability of VENCorp to recover its costs in respect of that task,

  • modifies the operation of the cross-ownership provisions of the Electricity Industry Act 2000 in relation to new generation projects

  • makes provision for the establishment of a deemed contract between electricity distribution companies and retail customers.

  • clarifies the scope of the obligation created under the retailer of last resort scheme and modifies the scope of Government's powers to make Orders in Council in relation to metrology procedures.

  • amends the Electricity Safety Act 1998 improve the operation of the electricity safety management scheme provisions and the provisions dealing with bushfire mitigation plans.

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. Other than sections 5 and 10 the provisions in the Bill commence on the day after Royal Assent. Sections 5 and 10 commence on proclamation but not later than by 31 December 2002.

[5]. Inserts a new section 40A into the Act dealing with deemed distribution contracts. The new section 40A allows a distribution company, subject to the conditions of its licence, to give notice of terms and conditions applying in respect of the distribution or supply of electricity by that company to retail customers or a class of customers. The terms and conditions must be approved by the Office of the Regulator-General.

[6]. Broadens power to make an Order in Council specifying requirements for the provision, installation and maintenance of metering installations to be used to facilitate arrangements whereby a customer of one retailer elects to become a customer of another retailer or relating to the settlement of the wholesale electricity market.

[9]. Inserts a new section 68(8A) dealing with the general prohibition with respect to cross-ownership in relation to a generation or distribution company from holding a controlling interest in another generation company. The new provision further clarifies exemptions to the general prohibition.

[10]. Inserts a new section 79A which expands VENCorp's power to manage electricity demand.

Amendments to the Electricity Safety Act 1998

[11 and 12]. Contain amendments to improve the operation of the electricity safety management scheme provisions and the provisions dealing with bushfire mitigation plans. [11] Amends section 83A(1) obligations on electricity suppliers to prepare and submit proposals for mitigation of bushfire danger in respect of electrical lines and electrical installations so that the obligations extend to overhead private electric lines.

The Committee makes no further comment.


Food (Amendment) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister Introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio Responsibility: Minister for Health

Purpose

The Bill amends the Food Act 1984 (the Act) to

  • give effect to the core provisions of the Model Food Act endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments; and

  • make further provision with respect to food safety programs; and

  • improve the enforcement provisions of that Act.

The Committee notes the extracts from the Second Reading Speech –

Broadly, the Bill amends the current Act in three ways. First, it introduces the core provisions of the Model Food Bill. Second, it introduces template food safety programs, provides for the registration of templates which some proprietors may choose to use in preparing a food safety program and removes the requirement for these proprietors to have their food safety program audited. Third, it amends provisions with respect to registration procedures and the obligations on local government as the registration authority.

The Bill also redefines a number of offences with respect to the sale of unsafe and unsuitable food and to false representations about food.

The more serious offences, which are indictable offences triable summarily, involve a person in handling food in a manner that a person knows, or should know, will render the food unsafe, or selling food that a person knows or should know is unsafe.

The Bill also provides that it is an indictable offence to falsely describe food or to sell food that a person knows or should know is falsely described when the likely result will be physical harm to a consumer who relies on the description.

The Bill also creates less serious forms of all these offences, together with offences of engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in the conduct of a food business, and of non-compliance with the food standards code.

The Bill also codifies defences and, in particular, contains a defence of due diligence which allows a person, including a corporation, to prove that they took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence.

In line with the Model Bill, the Bill significantly raises the penalties for offences with respect to food. This approach was the subject of national consultation. The penalties range from a maximum of two years imprisonment and/or a fine of $100 000 for an individual, or $500 000 in the case of a corporation for the more serious indictable offences.

For summary offences, the penalties are a maximum of $40 000 for an individual and $200 000 in the case of a corporation.

These provisions are a reflection of the seriousness with which this government regards the sale of unsafe and harmful food to the public. More serious breaches can be tried before a jury. These indictable offences are also triable summarily.

Other provisions in the Bill reflect the emergency powers to be held by the Secretary, agreed to in the Model Bill. These emergency powers are similar to the current powers under the Food Act and they allow the Secretary to make a range of orders in circumstances where the order is intended to prevent or reduce the possibility of a serious danger to the public or to mitigate the adverse consequences of a serious danger to the public.

The Model Bill includes provisions for compensation arising from an improper use of the Secretary's emergency powers. It has been agreed that the forum to determine such issues will be the Magistrates Court, where all other proceedings under the current act take place. Should the claim for compensation exceed the monetary limitation of the Magistrates Court it will go to the appropriate higher court.

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. The provisions of the Bill come into operation on proclamation but not later than by 1 January 2002.

[3]. Inserts objects into the Act, including to ensure food for sale is both safe and suitable for human consumption; to prevent misleading conduct in connection with the sale of food; and to provide for the application in Victoria of the Food Standards Code.

[5]. Inserts new sections 4A to 4G into the Act setting out the meaning of various terms used in the Act, including those of "food", "food business", "unsafe" food and "unsuitable" food. The former expressions of ‘food which is unfit for human consumption’ and ‘adulterated food’ are now redundant.

[7]. Inserts new sections 6A and 6B in the Act to provide that certain Parts of the Act do not apply to primary food production or water suppliers.

[8]. Substitutes Part 2 of the Act.

  • New sections 8 and 8A creates offences respectively for a person to knowingly or where a person ought reasonable to know, to handle food intended for sale in a manner that will render the food unsafe.

  • New section 9 and 9A create offences to sell food which a person knows, or should know, is unsafe.

  • New sections 10 and 10A create offences to falsely describe food or to sell food that a person knows, or should know, is falsely described, when the likely result will be physical harm to a consumer who relies on the description.

  • For sections 8, 9 and 10 the maximum penalty applicable for these offences is 2 years imprisonment or a fine of $100 000, or both, for an individual, or a fine of $500 000 in the case of a corporation. For the offences under section 8A, 9A and 10A there are only monetary penalties set at 25% below the more serious offences of acting knowingly in each case.

  • New sections 11 to 16 create less serious forms of offences, such as handling and sale of unsafe, or unsuitable food or food not complying with the purchaser’s demand, sale of unfit equipment or packaging or labelling material, offences of engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct in the conduct of a food business, and of non-compliance with the Food Standards Code. The maximum penalty for these summary offences is $40 000 in the case of an individual, and $200 000 in the case of a corporation.

  • New section 17 provides that a proprietor of a food business must prominently display his or her name on the premises.

  • New Section 17A deals with false descriptions of food.

  • New section 17B applies the provisions of Part 2 of the Act to food sold or intended to be sold outside Victoria.

  • New sections 17C to 17H provide for defences to the penalty provisions, including 17E, the defence of due diligence.

[11]. Removes the requirement on local councils to be satisfied that a food safety program is adequate as a condition of registration.

Food Safety Programs

[12]. Substitutes section 19D of the Act with new sections 19D, 19DA, 19DB and 19DC.

New section 19D, containing a definition of a food safety program.

New section 19DA, containing a definition of food safety program template being a registered document containing instructions to a food business proprietor to enable compliance with new section 19D.

New section 19DB, provides that the Secretary may register food safety program templates and may specify the classes of food business for which the template is suitable.

New section 19DC, defining a standard food safety program as one written in accordance with a suitable template.

[13]. Substitutes a new section 19E of the Act imposing various obligations on the proprietor of a food business in relation to food safety programs.

[15]. Replaces the definition of a food safety instructor with that of a food safety supervisor. A food safety supervisor must meet food safety competency standards, be able to identify hazards and be able to supervise other people handling food.

[17]. Inserts a new section 19H that provides for the inspection by local government of food premises using standard food safety programs, and the action to be taken in the event of non-compliance with the program.

New section 19I provides for the private audit of food premises that use non-standard food safety programs, and the action to be taken in the event of non-compliance.

[19]. The Secretary may exempt specified food proprietors from the obligation to have a food safety supervisor in relation to a food premises.

[22]. Substitutes new sections 35 to 37 for former sections 35, 35A, 36 and 37 and provides that the proprietor of a food business must register all food premises at which the business is operated with the council of the municipal district in which the premises is located, and that a food business may not operate in those premises if the registration is suspended.

[23]. Provides for an exemption to the registration requirement for premises licensed under the Dairy Act 2000.

[24]. Substitutes new section 38A of the Act and inserts a new section 38B requiring proprietors applying for registration to provide a copy of their food safety programs with their applications and to indicate if the premises has a food safety program created with a template.

Emergency Orders

[27]. Substitutes a new Part 7 of the Act dealing with emergency powers.

There are provisions that give the Secretary powers to make emergency orders, specify the nature of the orders that can be made. The provisions provide for penalties for failure to comply, and for compensation payable in the case of an unwarranted order being made under 44D.

New section 44 provides that an order may be made by the Secretary where it is necessary to prevent or reduce the possibility of a serious danger to public health.

An Order may –

  • require the publication of warnings that a particular food is unsafe;

  • prohibit the cultivation, taking, harvesting or obtaining, from a specified area, of a particular food;

  • prohibit a particular food from being advertised or sold;

  • direct that a particular food be recalled and specify the manner in which, and the period within which, the recall is to be conducted;

  • direct that a particular food be impounded, isolated, destroyed or otherwise disposed of;

  • prohibit the carrying on of an activity in relation to a particular food , or permit the carrying on of the activity in accordance with conditions specified in the order;

  • requiring the taking and analysis of samples of the food or of water or soil or any other thing that is part of the environment in which that activity is carried on in relation to the food;

  • specify methods of analysis (not inconsistent with any methods prescribed by the Food Standards Code) of any samples required to be taken in accordance with the order.

Recall Order

New section 44B deals with recall orders. A person who is bound by a recall order is liable for any reasonable costs incurred in connection with the recall order.

New section 44C provides that an order is binding and ceases to have effect at the expiration of 90 days after the day on which it takes effect unless it is sooner revoked or re-issued.

Compensation

New section 44D provides that a person bound by an order who suffers loss as a result of the making of the order may apply to the Secretary for compensation if the person considers that there were insufficient grounds for the making of the order.

An applicant who is dissatisfied with a determination by the Secretary as to the refusal to pay compensation or as to the amount of compensation may apply to the Magistrates' Court for a review of the determination. If the amount of compensation sought exceeds the jurisdictional limit of the Magistrates' Court, the application is to be made to the Supreme Court.

New 44E provides that it is an offence to fail to comply with an emergency order.

New section 44F provides that it is not necessary for the Secretary to give any person affected by an order a chance to be heard before such an emergency order is made.

The Committee notes that by section 44F the Secretary is not bound to give a person who may be affected by an emergency order a chance to be heard before the order is made, but has a discretion to do so. On the face of the provision this may be considered to breach the principles of natural justice and may therefore be in breach of section 4D(a)(i) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968.

The Committee notes that emergency nature of such orders affecting important matters concerning public health and also the existence of compensation provisions for cases where orders are made on insufficient grounds.

The Committee is of the opinion that in legislation of this nature there must be a balance struck between public health and safety and individual rights. Balancing these two objectives the Committee believes that the provision is not an undue trespass to rights and freedoms.

[28]. Inserts a new section 50A to permit alternative verdicts for serious food offences such that a person charged with a serious offence can be found guilty of an alternative lesser offence.

[29]. Inserts new sections 52A and 52B to provide for the separate liability of employees, agents and employers for breaches of the Act or regulations.

In certain circumstances an employer may be deemed to be liable for an offence committed by an employee. Under the provisions an employer has a defence of ‘due diligence’. An employer may be proceeded against irrespective of a conviction or proceedings against an employee.

The Committee notes that the provision effectively deems the actions of an employee to be those of the employer reflecting the legal doctrine of vicarious liability.

The Committee accepts this deeming provision places a heavy, but reasonable burden on food business employers for acts of their employees. The Committee notes the defence of due diligence is available to employers.

[30]. Inserts a new section 53A allowing a court to award costs and expenses for proceedings brought under the Act. New section 53B permits a court to order corrective advertising.

Protection against liability for authorised officers

[31]. Inserts a new section 56 making the Secretary and a local council liable for the acts or omissions performed in good faith by authorized officers and employees.

[33]. Inserts transitional provisions to preserve orders made prior to the passing of the Act.

[34]. Provides for the new indictable offences inserted by the Bill to be heard summarily under the Magistrates' Court Act 1989.

The Committee makes no further comment.


Health Services (Health Purchasing Victoria) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Health

Purpose

The Bill amends the Health Services Act 1988 (the Act) in relation to the supply of goods and services to health or related services, including public hospitals, and establishes Health Purchasing Victoria (HPV).

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. The provisions in the Bill come into operation on 1 July 2001.

[6]. Amends section 42 of the Act providing the Secretary power to issue a direction to a public hospital requiring it to appoint HPV as its agent for the purposes of obtaining or purchasing goods and services. The direction can stipulate the conditions on which the hospital must appoint HPV as agent.

[7]. Amends section 58 of the Act to permit the Minister to exercise the powers in section 58 in relation to a public hospital that fails to comply with an HPV direction or a purchasing policy. Section 58 allows the Minister to censure a registered agency, suspend admission of patients to the agency, recommend to the Governor in Council that an administrator of the agency be appointed or recommend to the Governor in Council that the agency be closed.

Establishment of Health Purchasing Victoria

[8]. Inserts a new Part 6 into the Act comprising new sections 129 to 134N.

New section 129 establishes Health Purchasing Victoria (HPV) and provides that it is a body corporate with perpetual succession which may sue and be sued in its corporate name, may acquire, hold and dispose of real and personal property, and may do and suffer all things that a body corporate may do and suffer.

New section 131 sets out the functions of HPV including to supply and facilitate access to the supply of goods and services to public hospitals and other health or related services.

New section 132 sets out the powers of HPV.

New section 134A provides that HPV can exempt a public hospital or class of public hospitals from the requirement to comply with a purchasing policy.

New section 134D provides for the membership of HPV. The Governor in Council may also appoint up to 2 additional members who have expertise which the Minister believes is relevant to the functions of HPV. New section 134E sets out the terms and conditions of members of HPV.

New section 134F relates to the removal, resignation or vacancy in the office of an HPV member.

New section 134I relates to direct or indirect conflicts of interest of HPV members and prohibits improper use of any information acquired as a member of HPV to obtain a direct or indirect advantage.

New section 134K is a delegation provision –

HPV may, by instrument, delegate to a member or an employee of HPV any of its powers except – (a) the power to make, amend or revoke purchasing policies under section 134; (b) this power of delegation.

The Committee accepts that the delegation provision is appropriate to give effect to the purposes of the Act.

New section 134L gives the Minister power to issue directions to HPV about any of its functions or powers, including directions which set limits or controls on the extent to which HPV can expend and borrow money and enter into contracts and joint ventures.

The new section 134L also gives the Secretary the power to issue directions to HPV regarding the terms and conditions on which HPV employs staff.

New section 134N relates to contracts for goods or services entered by public hospitals before 1 July 2001. A public hospital will not be required to comply with an HPV direction or purchasing policy to the extent that the direction or policy is inconsistent with a pre-1 July contract. However, a public hospital will not be able to vary such a contract or exercise an option to extend or renew such a contract on or after 1 July 2001 unless HPV provides written consent.

The Committee makes no further comment.


Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs Enforcement Measures ) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. P. Batchelor MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Transport

Purpose

The Bill amends the Road Safety Act 1986 (the Act), the Marine Act 1988 and other Acts related to alcohol and drugs enforcement. The Bill –

  • Amends the driving over the   05 blood alcohol concentration (BAC) offence provisions to provide that an offence is committed at a reading of   05 BAC in line with most other states and territories. The current legislation provides that an offence is committed when the BAC is ‘more than’ the prescribed limit which is expressed to two (2) decimal places only. Thus an offence is not committed at   059 as this is interpreted as a reading of   05. The same applies to other threshold offences such as that occurring at the   109 BAC (interpreted as   10).

  • Provides for a new 'accompanying driver offence'. This will set a legal BAC limit of   05. The Bill will require an accompanying driver to produce their licence and submit to testing, in the same way as if the person were driving the vehicle. The Bill does not change the zero BAC requirement for professional driving instructors.

  • Provides power for the police to be able to administer an evidential breath alcohol test as a preliminary step in the drug driving assessment process. The Bill will make it clear that the police can do this in all cases.

  • Makes amendments to permit certificates relating to blood and urine samples taken outside the three-hour period to be admitted in evidence. Defendants still have the right to challenge the evidence contained in the certificate in court.

  • Amendments to the Marine Act 1988 relating to BAC limits for boat operators.

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. Part 1 and sections 17, 24, 25 and 26 will come into operation on the day after Royal Assent. The remaining provisions come into force on proclamation but not later than by 1 February 2002.

Amendments to the Road Safety Act 1986

[3]. Inserts a definition of "accompanying driver offence" into section 3(1) of the Act.

[4]. Amends section 48 of the Act. A new section 48(1AAA) to provide that, for the purposes of the alcohol and drug provisions of the Act, an instructor (other than a commercial instructor) is to be taken to be in charge of the vehicle when accompanying a learner driver. New section 48(1AB) provides that a person who is actually driving or in charge of a vehicle remains subject to the alcohol and drug provisions of the Act despite the fact that an accompanying driver is present.

[5]. Amends section 49 of the Act to alter the method of expressing blood alcohol concentration for driving offences. Presently, section 49 prohibits blood alcohol concentrations of "more than" the prescribed level.

Note

In the Supreme Court case of Blanksby v Barnes [1998] 2V.R. 164, the Court held that, as the Act expresses prescribed blood alcohol concentration with two decimal places, readings to the third decimal place should be disregarded. Under this interpretation, a person is not in breach of the provisions even though that person's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is more than the prescribed amount unless the excess is   01 or more. Thus a reading of   059 would be interpreted as a reading of   05.

To redress this situation, the proposed amendments alter the definitions of offences under section 49 by replacing references to a BAC of "more than" the prescribed level with references to a BAC of the prescribed level itself, or higher. This means that the relevant offence is committed if a BAC is at the prescribed level of   05.

[6]. Also amends section 49 of the Act to fix a penalty for an "accompanying driver offence", that is, for a breach of the alcohol or drug provisions committed by a person instructing a learner driver but who is not a commercial instructor. The amendments will prescribe a penalty of up to 5 penalty units ($500).

[7]. Makes consequential amendments amends section 50 of the Act, dealing with the cancellation of driving licences or permits of persons found guilty of certain alcohol and drug offences and their disqualification from obtaining further licences or permits. The purpose of the amendments is to express BAC, for these purposes, as being at the stated levels instead of as "more than" the stated levels as in [5] above.

[8]. Also amends section 50 of the Act so that a person who is found guilty of an "accompanying driver offence" is not subject to licence cancellation or disqualification under that section.

[9]. Inserts a new sub-section 53(1E) prescribing a BAC of zero for motor cyclists during the first year in which they are licensed to drive motor cycles. At present, a first year motor cyclist is not restricted to zero BAC if he or she holds a motor car licence and the zero BAC period has expired in relation to that licence. The clause also amends the expression of zero BAC to ‘any concentration of alcohol present in the blood of that person'.

[10]. Inserts a new section 53(1)(ab) into the Act to authorise police officers to administer a preliminary breath test to any person in a motor vehicle if the driver or person in charge does not hold a licence appropriate to that vehicle. The accompanying person may have committed an "accompanying driver offence". This new section will enable police to require other persons in the vehicle to undergo a preliminary breath test in the same way as the actual driver or person in charge.

[11]. Amends section 55 of the Act to enable breath analysis tests to be administered to a person who is undergoing an assessment for drug impairment.

[11(3)] amends section 55(9A) to enable a police officer to require a blood sample from a person who had undergone breath analysis under the preceding provisions where the person was unable to provide a sufficient breath sample or because the machine malfunctioned. Such blood samples could only be required on identical grounds to those under the existing alcohol provisions.

Note

A health professional that takes a blood sample in accordance with section 55(9A) has immunity from suit under section 55(9E). This immunity from suit will also apply to a health professional who takes a blood sample for the purposes of a drug assessment under section 55(9A) as amended by clause 11(3). See also the notes to clause 16: It is intended that the amended section 55 will alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 in relation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction.

Immunity from suit

A health professional that takes a blood sample in accordance with section 55(9A) has immunity from suit under section 55(9E). This immunity from suit will also apply to a health professional who takes a blood sample for the purposes of a drug assessment under section 55(9A) as amended by [11(3)]. See also [16] for section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 provision relevant to this clause in relation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction.

[12]. Inserts section 55B(1A) to prevent a blood sample being required for the purposes of drug testing from a person who has already provided a blood sample for alcohol testing under section 55(9A) in relation to the same circumstances. Section 57(2) of the Act already provides that the results of such a test are admissible as evidence in proceedings for alcohol and drug offences.

[13 and 14]. Amends sections 57 and 57A of the Act so as to enable certified results of tests of blood samples to be used as evidence even if the sample is taken more than three hours after driving. At the moment the only way in which evidence of the test result can be given if the sample was taken more than three hours after driving is by calling the analyst who conducted the test to give evidence.

[15]. Amends section 89C of the Act, which deals with the cancellation of drivers' licences or permits in certain cases. The amendments express references to BAC in terms of being at, in addition to being above, the specified concentration. See also [5].

Report to the Parliament pursuant section 4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 concerning a repeal alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.

[16]. Inserts a new section 94A(3) into the Act. The new section declares that it is the intention of section 55(9E), to the extent that the section applies in respect of anything done under section 55(9A) as amended by [11] of the Bill to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1986.

The proposed alteration or variation of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction relates to the immunity from suit that section 55(9E) of the Act confers on health professionals who take blood samples for the purposes of alcohol and drug tests under section 55(9A).

Immunity from suit already exists in relation to the taking of blood samples under the existing alcohol provisions. The amendments to section 55(9A) proposed by [11] will authorise the taking of a blood sample from a person who was initially assessed for drugs. Consequently, the scope of the immunity conferred by section 55(9E) will be indirectly extended to cover these new cases.

To ensure that the immunity conferred is effective, it is necessary to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 in relation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction. This is consistent with previous legislation relating to the section 55(9E) immunity.

The Committee notes the section 85 statement made by the Minister in the Second Reading Speech –

Under section 55(9A) of the Road Safety Act 1986, a person may be required to provide a sample of blood for analysis for its alcohol content if that person could not provide a sufficient breath sample or because the machine malfunctioned. This Bill proposes to insert a new section 55(2AA), which will allow police to require a breath sample from a person undergoing drug assessment. Consequently, the Bill also extends the scope of section 55(9A) to apply to the taking of a blood sample from a person who has been required to provide a breath sample under new subsection (2AA) if that breath sample cannot be tested. The circumstances in which such a blood sample may be taken, and the procedures which govern the taking of the blood sample, will otherwise be identical with those relating to persons who are being assessed under section 55.

Section 55(9E) presently provides that no action lies against a registered medical practitioner or an approved health professional in respect of anything properly and necessarily done in the course of taking a blood sample in accordance with section 55(9A). The scope of this immunity from action is effectively extended by this Bill because blood samples may be taken in an additional class of cases.

Clause 16 of the Bill proposes to insert a new section 94A(3) into the Road Safety Act 1986. That new section declares that it is the intention of section 55(9E) of the act to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 to the extent necessary to prevent the bringing of an action of the kind referred to in section 55(9E).

The reason for this proposed alteration or variation is as follows.

It is in the interests of road safety and the general public to prevent or deter persons who are impaired by alcohol or drugs from driving motor vehicles. The enforcement system in relation to alcohol and drug impairment of motorists depends in part on the cooperation of health professionals in taking and analysing blood samples in accordance with the legislation. For these reasons, health professionals should be immune from legal action in relation to things properly and necessarily done in taking blood samples. The proposed alteration or variation to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction is necessary to ensure that the immunity conferred by section 55(9E) is effective.

In this context, it should also be noted that the Bill proposes to prohibit a second blood sample being required under section 55B if a sample has already been obtained under section 55. The taking of blood samples is invasive and should be minimised. There should be no need to take a second sample. The first sample can be tested for both alcohol and drugs and the existing section 57(2) enables such test results to be used in evidence in relevant legal proceedings.

The Committee has examined the proposed section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 clause and notes the Minister’s statement in the Second Reading Speech and accepts that the provision is consistent with the purposes of the Bill.

[17]. Amends section 16(1) of the Road Safety (Further Amendment) Act 1991 (not yet in force). When that section comes into force, it will insert a new section 89C(1A) into the Act. This will provide for automatic suspension for one month of the licence of a person to whom a traffic infringement notice is issued for certain drink-driving offences whilst driving or in charge of a large vehicle. This amendment is consequential on other amendments made in the Act so as to express BAC at the stated level of   05 instead of as "more than" that level. See [5] above.

Amendments to the Marine Act 1988 (the Act)

[18]. Inserts a new definition of "accompanying operator offence" into section 3(1) of the Marine Act 1988.

[19]. Inserts a new section 27(1AAA) into the Act to create a similar offence to the "accompanying operator offence" in the Road Safety Act 1986.

[20]. Amends section 28(1) of the Act to alter the definitions of certain offences under that section by replacing references to a prescribed BAC of "more than" the prescribed concentration with references to BAC of the prescribed level itself, or higher. See also [5].

[21]. Amends section 28 of the Act to fix a penalty for an "accompanying operator offence" set at 5 penalty units ($500). The clause also amends section 28(2) and (3) to exempt a person who is found guilty of an "accompanying driver offence" from liability to the heavier fines and imprisonment prescribed by those sub-sections.

[22]. Inserts a new section 29(1)(ab) into the Act to authorise a police officer to administer a preliminary breath test to any person found in a vessel under way if the person in charge is required to be accompanied by a licensed operator.

[23] Amends section 32 of the Act to enable certified results of tests of blood samples to be used as evidence even if the sample is taken more than three hours after operating a vessel. See also [13 and 14].

[24]. Amends section 3 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000, which when in force will amend section 3(1) of the Act to insert a new definition of "prescribed BAC" in place of a definition that was to have been inserted by the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000.

The new definition will fix BAC for the purposes of the Act as in the case of persons under 21, any concentration of alcohol at all, and any other persons,   05.

[25]. Amends section 9 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000, (not yet in force) to insert a new section 28A(4) into the Act. The effect of the new section 28A(4) will be that a person who is found guilty of an "accompanying operator offence" is not subject to the licence cancellation or disqualification which would otherwise apply under that section.

[26]. Amends section 13 of the Marine (Amendment) Act 2000, (not yet in force) and will insert section 61BA into the Act to deal with the manner in which blood alcohol concentration is expressed for the purposes of that section. See also [5].

The Committee makes no further comment.


Tobacco (Further Amendment) Bill

Introduced: 4 April 2001
Second Reading Speech: 5 April 2001
House: Legislative Assembly
Minister introducing Bill: Hon. J. Thwaites MLA
Portfolio responsibility: Minister for Health

Purpose

The Bill amends the Tobacco Act 1987 (the Act) and the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2000 (the Amending Act) that are not yet in force. The main features of the Bill are –

  • All enclosed retail shopping centres in Victoria will now be required to be smoke free. Currently the provisions only apply to ‘controlled shopping centres’ which were declared by Governor in Council order under the Act with the consent of the owner of the shopping centre;

  • Retailers will be required to display signs that state it is illegal to sell tobacco to minors;

  • The sale of single cigarettes will be prohibited. After the amendments made by the Bill come into force the minimum purchase of cigarettes will be in packs of 20;

  • The advertising of cheap smokes or discount cigarette signs outside tobacco retail outlets will be prohibited;

  • Loopholes in the provisions prohibiting the practice of providing gifts with tobacco products will be eliminated; and

  • Mobile cigarette sellers will be banned.

Content and Committee comment

[Clauses]

[2]. Part 1, section 16 and Part 3 come into operation on the day after Royal Assent. Section 8 comes into operation on 1 July 2001. Sections 7, 9, 10, 12, 15 and 17(2) come into operation on 1 October 2001. Sections 3(2), 4, 5, 6 and 11 come into operation on 1 November 2001. The remaining provisions of the Bill come into operation on 1 January 2002.

[3]. Repeals the redundant definition of "controlled shopping centre" as the Act will now apply to all shopping centres as from 1 November 2001.

[4]. Repeals section 3C of the Act which allowed for a retail shopping centre to be declared to be a shopping centre to which the Act applied.

[5]. Amends section 5C of the Act to create an offence of smoking in an enclosed area of a retail shopping centre – 5 penalty units ($500).

[6]. Substitutes a new section 5D(1) of the Act to create an offence for the occupier of an enclosed area of a retail shopping centre if smoking occurs in that area – 5 penalty units ($500).

[8]. Amends section 7 of the Act to prohibit the supply of any non-tobacco products or other benefits in connection with the promotion or the sale of a tobacco product.

[9]. Inserts a new section 13A in the Act to prohibit the mobile selling of tobacco products, and also prohibits authorising another person to do so.

[10]. Amends section 14 of the Act to extend the ban on selling cigarettes in a package containing less than 20. The sale of unpackaged cigarettes is prohibited.

[11]. Substitutes a new section 15B of the Act to impose a requirement on the owners of retail shopping centres to display no smoking signs.

[12]. Inserts a new 15C(3) of the Act to impose an obligation on tobacco retailers to display a sign relating to the prohibition on the sale of tobacco products to persons under the age of 18 years.

[14]. Inserts a new section 13E(2) into the Act to allow inspectors to inspect and measure a tobacco advertisement without the necessity of a warrant, that is visible to the customer at any time the relevant premises are open to the public.

Report to the Parliament pursuant section 4D(b)(i) and (ii) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 concerning a repeal alteration or variation of section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.

[16]. Inserts a new section 42B(2) into the Act to declare that it is the intention of section 42 of the Act as it applies after the commencement of the various provisions of the Bill to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.

The Committee notes the following comments from the Second Reading Speech –

I wish to make a statement pursuant to section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 about the reasons for altering or varying that section by clause 16 of the Tobacco (Further Amendment) Bill. That clause inserts a new subsection (2) in section 42B of the Tobacco Act, which states that it is the intention of section 42, as it will have effect after the amendments come into force, to alter or vary section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975.

Section 42 of the Tobacco Act provides that an action does not lie against a person for the failure to do anything that would constitute an offence under the Act. This was included in the Act when it was first passed in 1987.

The Bill creates a number of new offences. It is necessary that section 42 apply to those offences in the same way that it applies to existing offences.

It would frustrate the purpose of the Act if people felt compelled to undertake activities that were prohibited by the Bill, such as the mobile selling of tobacco products, out of fear of some legal action which may be brought against them if they fail or refuse to do so.

The Committee has examined the proposed section 85 of the Constitution Act 1975 clause and notes the Minister’s statement in the Second Reading Speech and accepts that the provision is consistent with the purposes of the Bill.

[17]. Amends the Schedule to the Act to allow for infringement notices to be issued for offences that prohibit the display of a tobacco product at a place other than a point of sale; the mobile selling of tobacco products and the sale of cigarettes that are not in a package containing at least 20 cigarettes.

Amendments to the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2000 (the amending Act)

[18]. Amends the commencement provision of the amending Act. Sections 7(1) and 13(1) and (3) of that Act (no-smoking in restaurants and signs in retail outlets) will still come into operation on 1 July 2001. However, sections 8, 9, 10 and 16(1)(b) (point of sale advertising) will now come into operation on 1 January 2002.

[19]. Makes a number of amendments to section 8 of the Amending Act, which will amend section 6 of the Act (tobacco advertisements). [19(1) and (2)] ensure that tobacco products may only be displayed at a point of sale. [19(3)(a)] allows for tobacco displays at a point of sale and representations of tobacco products on vending machines, provided that those displays comply with section 6A of the Act. [19(3)(a)] also allows for notices about tobacco products (price boards) at a point of sale that comply with the prescribed requirements. [19(3)(b)] allows for the regulations regarding price tickets to deal with the way in which those price tickets may be displayed. [19(3)(c)] allows for price tickets on vending machines that meet the prescribed requirements.

[20]. Amends section 9 of the Amending Act which will insert a new section 6A in the Act to regulate the way in which tobacco products may be displayed at a point of sale and the way in which representations of tobacco products may be displayed on vending machines and the way in which tobacco products may be displayed, including the display of cartons at on-airport duty free shops.

[21]. Amends section 13 of the Amending Act, which will insert a new section 15A in the Act to deal with no smoking signs that must be displayed in enclosed restaurants, cafes and dining areas. The amendment requires those signs to meet requirements to be prescribed.

[22]. Amends section 13(3) of the Amending Act which will insert a new section 15C in the Act to require the occupier of a retail outlet to display either a health warning sign or a sign relating to programs assisting in the cessation of smoking. The revised new section 15C requires those signs to meet requirements to be prescribed.

The Committee accepts that some provisions in the Bill may impinge on certain rights and freedoms of some members of the community and at the same time enhance the rights and freedoms of others.

Whether the diminution of any of these rights and freedoms is an undue trespass is a matter for the Parliament to determine.

The Committee makes no further comment.


col seal.jpg (5540 bytes) Scrutiny of Acts and
Regulations Committee

Last Updated 2/5/2001
©Parliament of Victoria