Annual Review 2003, May 2004
The Annual Review
This report provides a summary of the Scrutiny of Acts
and Regulations Committee’s (‘the Committee’) work in
the scrutiny of Bills and outlines its other statutory reporting and inquiry
functions during 2003. There are two useful publications that further
describe the Committee’s work and activities during 2003, the Annual
Review of Statutory Rules considered in 2002[i]
and the cumulative Alert Digest of 2003[ii]
concerning the scrutiny of Bills introduced in the Parliament. The Committee’s
Alert Digests and all other inquiry reports and discussion papers are
available on the Committee’s Website.
The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee
The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (“the
Committee”) is established under the Parliamentary Committees
Act 2003[iii]
(“the Act”) as one of the 11 Joint House Committees of the
Victorian Parliament. The Committee is one of 5 Joint House Committees
administered by the Department of the Legislative Assembly. The remaining
6 Joint House Committees are administered by the Department of the Legislative
Council. The membership of the Committee is drawn from members elected
to the Council and the Assembly and from government and opposition members.
History of the Committee in brief
The Committee under its current name and functions was established
in November 1992 at the beginning of the 52nd Parliament. Mr Victor Perton
MLA (LP - Doncaster) became the Committee's first Chairman. Following
the March 1996 State election the Committee was reconstituted for the
53rd Parliament with Mr Peter Ryan MLA (NP - Gippsland South) as Chairman.
The 53rd Parliament was dissolved in August 1999. The Committee of the
54th Parliament was reconstituted on 15 December 1999 with Ms Mary Gillett
MLA (ALP - Werribee) elected Chair of the Committee. From March 2003 the
Chair of the Committee in the 55th Parliament is Ms Lily D'Ambrosio MLA
(ALP - Mill Park).
Other jurisdictions which have parliamentary committees
with a scrutiny of bills function are the Commonwealth, Queensland, New
South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. All Australian jurisdictions
have some form of scrutiny of subordinate legislation (regulations/ordinances)
function.
New Parliamentary Committees Act 2003
In the previous Parliament the Committee undertook an inquiry
into the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968. The terms of reference
of that inquiry requested the Committee to make recommendations to the
Parliament for a new Act. The Committee tabled its report on a proposed
improved Act with over 30 recommendations in May 2002.
On 5 November 2003 a new Parliamentary Committees Act
2003 was introduced into the Parliament and passed through the Council
and the Assembly in the Spring Session. The Act received Royal Assent
on 9 December 2003 and came into operation on the next day.
New features of the 2003 Act include -
-
Automatic jurisdiction for the Committee to consider
Acts passed within 30 days after the first appointment of the incoming
Committee established in a new Parliament in circumstances where the
Committee had no opportunity to otherwise report on that Act under
sections 17(a) or 17(b) of the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,[iv]
-
Committees may empower one or more Committee members
to take evidence at a public hearing,[v]
-
Committee reports may be tabled when Parliament is
not in session,[vi]
-
Removal from the Act of provisions concerning private
Bills,[vii]
-
Use of gender neutral language throughout the Act.
Committee composition and membership
The Act[viii]
requires that the Committee must be composed of not more than nine members
of whom at least two must be members of the Legislative Council and two
must be members of the Legislative Assembly.
The Committee of the 55th Parliament consists of nine members.
Seven members are from the Legislative Assembly and two members from the
Legislative Council. As in the Committees established in the previous
Parliaments, five of the nine members are from the government and four
from the opposition.
Members during 2003
The members of the Committee during 2003 were -
-
Ms Lily D'Ambrosio MLA (Chairperson)
-
Mr Murray Thompson MLA (Deputy Chairperson)
-
The Hon. Lidia Argondizzo MLC
-
Mr Ken Jasper MLA " Mr Michael Leighton MLA
-
Mr Peter Lockwood MLA
-
Mr Andrew McIntosh MLA
-
The Hon. Andrew Olexander MLC
-
Mr Jude Perera MLA
The Subcommittees
As in the previous Parliament, by resolution of the Committee,
the Regulation Review Subcommittee and the Redundant Legislation Subcommittee
were re-established in April 2003.
Regulation Review Subcommittee
Functions
The functions of the Subcommittee are to review statutory
rules, as defined by the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994, against
specified terms of reference specified in that Act.[ix]
Pursuant to other statutory reporting responsibilities the Subcommittee
must review other specified subordinate instruments. During the term of
the 54th Parliament the Committee completed a major review of the Subordinate
Legislation Act 1994. The report on that inquiry was tabled in September
2002. To date no new legislation has been introduced giving effect to
the recommendations made by the Committee that have been accepted by the
government.
In 2003 the members of the Regulation Review Subcommittee
were -
Redundant Legislation Subcommittee
Functions
The Subcommittee operates under a long standing Governor
in Council reference to; review and make recommendations concerning Acts
of Parliament or legislative instruments that are unclear, ambiguous or
should be redrafted; reduce the number and complexity of Acts and legislative
instruments; and ensure that Acts and instruments are clearly expressed
in accordance with modern drafting practices.
The terms of reference of this on-going inquiry are shown
in Appendix 8.
The Members of the Redundant Legislation Subcommittee during
2003 were -
Other Subcommittees
By resolution the Committee has established two additional
subcommittees. The Equal Opportunity Subcommittee was established to undertake
the inquiry pursuant to section 207 of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995
and the E-Democracy Subcommittee to undertake an inquiry concerning electronic
media and its future use and implications in respect to participatory
democracy.
Equal Opportunity Subcommittee
Function
To undertake a review pursuant to section 207 of the Equal
Opportunity Act 1995 in respect to discrimination in the law (Victorian
enactments other than Council by-laws or local laws). The terms of reference
of the inquiry are shown in Appendix
7.
The Committee resolved that this inquiry should be undertaken
by the Subcommittee comprising all Members of the Committee.
E-Democracy Subcommittee
The Subcommittee was first constituted in February 2002
to undertake a reference concerning Electronic Democracy. The terms of
reference of this wide ranging inquiry are shown in Appendix
6. Whilst the Committee released a discussion paper and 9
discussion sheets during the later half of 2002 the inquiry remained incomplete
at the time of the dissolution of the 54th Parliament in November 2002.
The Committee of the 55th Parliament re-established the Subcommittee in
March 2003. The Members of the Subcommittee during 2003 were -
-
Mr Michael Leighton MLA (Chairperson)
-
The Hon. Lidia Argondizzo MLC
-
Mr Peter Lockwood MLA
-
The Hon. Andrew Olexander MLC
-
Mr Jude Perera MLA
-
Mr Murray Thompson MLA
Secretariat and Consultants
Staffing
The Committee secretariat is located at Level 8, 35 Spring
Street Melbourne. The secretariat staff comprises an Executive Officer
(Senior Legal Adviser) and a small team of legal and support staff. The
staffing of the Committee during 2003 were -
-
Mr Andrew Homer, Executive Officer and Senior Legal
Adviser;
-
Mr Simon Dinsbergs, Assistant Executive Officer;
-
Ms Helen Mason, Legal Adviser (Regulations);
-
Ms Sonya Caruana, Office Manager.
External consultants
The Committee engaged a number of consultants to undertake
specialist work on inquiries before the Committee. During 2003 the relevant
consultants were -
-
Ms Dominique Saunders, Review pursuant to section 207
of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995;
-
Dr David Blumenthal, Review of the Perpetuities
and Accumulations Act 1968;
-
Mr Michael Magazanik, Review of the Maintenance
Act 1965 and the Marriage Act 1958.
Committee Website
During 2003 the Committee continued to maintain a comprehensive
Website. The Website has cross links to the Department of Premier and
Cabinet site detailing Bills currently before Parliament. There is a further
cross reference to the Hansard site giving easy access to Second Reading
Speeches. The Committee site also maintains contact details and Membership
of counterpart scrutiny committees in the Commonwealth, State and Territory
Parliaments. The Committee Website address is www.parliament.vic.gov.au/sarc
The Work of the Committee
The Committee -
prepares periodical reports called Alert Digests in respect
to Bills introduced during Parliamentary sessions;
-
reviews all statutory rules and some other statutory
instruments;
-
seeks clarification from Ministers, departments or
government agencies on provisions contained in Bills and statutory
rules that concern the Committee within its terms of reference;
-
conducts inquiries, including calling for public submissions
and conducting public hearings, on Acts and other matters referred
to the Committee for investigation;
-
provides information to Members, organisations and
the public concerning the Committee's functions and activities.
The Committee's work during 2003
The Committee's work during 2003 fell into four main areas
-
-
Scrutiny of Bills introduced into Parliament;[x]
-
Scrutiny of subordinate legislation[xi]
(statutory rules) and specified directives[xii]
and other instruments (Refer also to the Subordinate Legislation
Act 1994, section 21 and the Public Sector Management and
Employment Act 1998, section 40(2));
-
Review of redundant, ambiguous or unclear legislation.
This function is performed pursuant to an ongoing standing instruction
to the Committee first vested in the Committee in May 1994 by a Governor
in Council Reference. The Reference has been renewed at the commencement
of each Parliament and continues during the life of the Parliament
unless revoked by Governor in Council Order. (Refer: Governor in Council
Order 12 May 1994 - Victorian Government Gazette (G.19), Page 1153,
May 1994); and
-
Review of other legislation that is referred to the
Committee by a resolution of either the Legislative Council or the
Legislative Assembly[xiii]
or by a Minister through an Order of the Governor in Council published
in the Government Gazette[xiv].
Section 17(a) - Scrutiny of Bills
The Committee considered 106 Bills during 2003. Pursuant
to section 17(a) the Committee is required to consider any Bill introduced
in the Council or the Assembly and report to the Parliament under 7 separate
heads of scrutiny numbered sub-paragraphs (i) to (vii). They are -
(i) trespasses unduly upon rights or freedoms;
(ii) makes rights, freedoms or obligations dependent
upon insufficiently defined administrative powers;
iii) makes rights, freedoms or obligations dependent upon
non-reviewable administrative decisions;
(iv) unduly requires or authorises acts or practices that
may have an adverse effect on personal privacy within the meaning of
the Information Privacy Act 2000;
(v) unduly requires or authorises acts or practices that
may have an adverse effect on privacy of health information within the
meaning of the Health Records Act 2001;
(vi) inappropriately delegates legislative power;
(vii) insufficiently subjects the exercise of legislative
power to parliamentary scrutiny;
A list of the Bills considered by the Committee during 2003
and the tabling dates of the 9 separate Alert Digests in which they are
found is shown in Appendix 1.
The Bills on which the Committee made a substantive comment based on the
respective scrutiny principles is shown in Appendix
2.
Section 17(b) - Scrutiny of Bills - Section 85, Constitution Act 1975
Pursuant to section 17(b) of the Parliamentary Committees
Act 2003, the Committee has a 'specific reporting' brief in relation
to Bills containing any provision which repeals, alters or varies the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (section 85 of the Constitution
Act 1975). The Committee is required to report to the Parliament
on the desirability and appropriateness of such provisions. The Act also
requires the Committee to report to the Parliament in circumstances where
a Bill does not repeal, alter or vary the jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court, but where an issue is nevertheless raised as to the Supreme Court's
jurisdiction, as to the full implication of such an issue.
Of the 106 Bills considered in 2003, 19 contained a section
85 Constitution Act 1975 provision, or about 18%. In 2002 of
the 96 Bills introduced 14 contained section 85 provisions, about 14%.
The Bills in 2003 containing section 85 provisions are listed in Appendix
2.
Ministerial correspondence
Ministerial response turnaround time continues to vary markedly
with some Ministers responding to the Committee's correspondence within
days. On rare occasions the Committee needs to follow-up requests for
further advice by reminder letters. Overall in the course of 2003 the
Committee was satisfied with the response time and the level of detail
provided by Ministers to the Committee's concerns. There were a number
of Bills where Ministers had not responded to the Committee's concerns
in the period covered by this report. In some instances Ministerial responses
will be included in Alert Digests to be tabled in 2004. A table of Ministerial
correspondence is shown in Appendix 3.
Statistical summary of Bills considered by the Committee from 1999 to
2003
Table 1 - Number of Bills considered by the Committee
and of those the number having section 85 Constitution Act 1975 provisions[xv].
Table 2 - Number of Alert Digests tabled in Parliament
The results of the Committee's work
The main function of the Committee is to advise the Legislative
Council and the Legislative Assembly concerning the use of certain legislative
practices in Bills introduced into the Parliament. Those legislative practices
are listed in section 17(a)(i) to (vii) of the Parliamentary Committees
Act 2003 and provide the basis for the Committee's terms of reference.
The clear feedback the Committee receives is that Members are assisted
by the Alert Digests tabled in Parliament by the Committee.
Whilst the Committee has no sanction to oppose objectionable
legislative practices its reports can be persuasive in advocating modifications
to legislation by Ministers. Where no change is made the Committee's work
illicits further information from Ministers which are published in a report
tabled in the Parliament for the benefit of Members and the public record.
The Committee does not consider it a useful primary benchmark
of its success to only point to the number of amendments it has been responsible
in securing through its correspondence with Ministers. Rather the Committee
considers that the fostering of a 'scrutiny culture' ensures that legislative
standards remain high and are only breached when they are explained by
the executive and then only in appropriate circumstances. There is strong
anecdotal evidence that the work of the Committee is understood and considered
by departments and government agencies when considering potentially objectionable
legislative provisions.
Problematic areas with Bills
During 2003, and generally over the last few years, a number
of persistent problems have been identified in the Committee's scrutiny
of Bills, these can be broadly categorised as -
-
Retrospective provisions
- failure to provide sufficient explanation in either the explanatory
memorandum or the Second Reading Speech concerning the necessity or
desirability of applying a law retrospectively has traditionally been
a problematic area for the Committee. Once again the Committee encountered
instances where the retrospective provision was necessary or desirable
in all the circumstances but this only became apparent after correspondence
with the relevant Minister.
Acceptable retrospective provisions include, where
the amendment provides a benefit or incentive to persons or where
the amendment takes the form of a minor statute law revision correcting
inadvertent omissions or errors that have no appreciable adverse consequence
to persons. Another major acceptable retrospective legislative practice
is to validate past actions or appointments made that as a consequence
of legal proceedings or otherwise, appear vulnerable to challenge
as a result of an unintended deficiency in the original legislation.
In these circumstances the amendment seeks to clarify the position
that had always thought to have existed but for the deficiency, and
declares that actions taken or appointments made were lawfully done
or made as though the Act had always existed as ultimately amended.
During the year the Committee reported on one retrospective
provision that may be considered to be a trespass to rights and freedoms.
This was in respect to the Fisheries (Further Amendment) Bill. There
was however material in the Second Reading Speech concerning the need
for such a provision and this was further clarified in the correspondence
between the Committee and the Minister.
-
Unhelpful explanatory memoranda
- failure to provide adequate detail in the explanatory memorandum
or the Second Reading Speech as to the intended operation of a clause.
As in the previous year the Committee saw a marked improvement in
explanatory memoranda attached to Bills. The Committee reported on
an instance of an inadequate explanatory memorandum in respect to
provisions in the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (Amendment)
Bill (Alert Digest 8 of 2003). In this instance the Minister responded
acknowledging the deficiency.
-
Unexplained commencement by proclamation
clauses - failure to provide adequate explanation for
the use of a commencement by proclamation clause rather than the use
of a specified commencement day or failure to provide an adequate
explanation for a considerably delayed commencement provision. During
2003 there were a number of Bills which had considerably delayed commencement
provisions that were not explained in the explanatory memorandum or
second reading speech. These were clarified by correspondence with
the Minister. During 2003 there were no cases of commencement by proclamation
clauses that were unexplained or that were explained and where the
Committee considered them to be unjustified.
-
Wide delegation provisions
- failure to explain delegation provisions which do not clearly define
or limit the extent of the delegation to a defined group of persons
or persons holding a specified office or rank, or possessing some
qualification or attribute. During 2003 there were a number of cases
identified where the Committee commented on the use of such provisions
and where the Committee wrote to the relevant Ministers to clarify
the need to use widely defined delegation powers in a number of Acts.
In each instance identified by the Committee the relevant Minister
gave further information to the Committee concerning the desirability
and need for such wide delegation provisions.
Section 17(d) - Scrutiny of Regulations - Subordinate Legislation Act
1994
Regulation Review Subcommittee
The Regulation Review Subcommittee held 12 meetings and
1 informal meeting during 2003. During those meetings it considered 117
statutory rules made during 2003 and 73 statutory rules made during 2002.
Of those rules considered by the Subcommittee and made during 2002, 14
were accompanied by regulation impact statements. Of those statutory rules
considered by the Subcommittee and made during 2003, 25 were accompanied
by regulation impact statements. Appendix
5 lists all the statutory rules examined by the Subcommittee
in 2003. There were a further 29 statutory rules made during 2003 that
will be considered by the Subcommittee in 2004.
The Subcommittee did not make any reports to Parliament
during 2003. However of the statutory rules examined during 2003, the
Subcommittee had concerns with 24 and wrote to responsible Ministers seeking
clarification. The Subcommittee received satisfactory responses to the
issues raised.
During 2002 the Subcommittee completed the Inquiry into
the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994. The Report made various
recommendations in respect of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994.
During March 2003 the Government tabled its response to the Report. The
Government fully supported 26 recommendations. The Government partly supported
14 recommendations. The Government did not support 15 recommendations.
A full analysis of the Government's response may be located in the Annual
Review of the Regulations 2002 published in November 2003.
Section 17(e) - Environment Protection Act 1970
The Subcommittee considered two State Environment Protection
Policies during 2003.
Section 17(f) - Reports pursuant to the Co-operative Schemes (Administrative
Actions) Act 2001
In 2003 the Committee was not required to report to the
Parliament on any Act sought to be declared pursuant to the Co-operative
Schemes (Administrative Actions) Act 2001.
A declaration of an Act (by Order of the Governor in Council)
has the effect of validating certain past administrative actions taken
under the declared Act and provides a legal immunity from proceedings
for certain past actions. Without such a declaration a recent High Court
decision[xvi] has suggested that
past administrative actions may be vulnerable to challenge. The immunity
limits or varies the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to hear certain
proceedings challenging any relevant past actions.
Section 17(g) - Review of Acts referred to the Committee
Redundant Legislation Subcommittee
The Subcommittee appointed 2 external consultants (see
page 5 above) to undertake preliminary research concerning
the 3 Acts referred to the Committee for investigation as redundant, ambiguous
or unclear legislation.
Committee Expenditure and Budget |
[xvii] |
Budget 2002-2003 |
Actual 2002-2003 |
Budget 2003 - 2004 |
$436,630 |
$418,667 |
$449,086 |
Committee publications released during 2003
During 2003 the Committee published the following reports
and papers in hard copy and on its Website -
-
Consolidated Alert Digests Nos. 1 to 9 of 2002, April
2003;
-
Annual Review 2002, August 2003;
-
Annual Review 2002, Regulations 2002, November 2003;
-
Alert Digests 1 to 9 of 2003, April to November 2003;
-
Discussion Paper on the inquiry pursuant to section
207 of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995, December 2003;
A chronological listing of Committee reports and publications
is shown in Appendix 4.
Reports due in 2004
-
Interim Report on the inquiry pursuant to section 207
of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995.
-
Reports on Acts referred to the Committee concerning
the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1968; the Maintenance
Act 1965 and the Marriage Act 1958.
Footnotes |
|
[i] |
November 2003. |
|
[ii] |
To be published in February 2004. |
|
[iii] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 5(k). |
|
[iv] |
Ibid., section 17(c). |
|
[v] |
Ibid., section 28(5). |
|
[vi] |
Ibid., section 35. |
|
[vii] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 1968,
sections 5 to 36. |
|
[viii] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 21(1). |
|
[ix] |
Subordinate Legislation Act 1994,
section 21. |
|
[x] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 17(a) and (b). |
|
[xi] |
The scrutiny of statutory rules (regulations) predates
the formation of the Committee and was performed by a number of
predecessor Parliamentary Committees such as the Legal and Constitutional
Committee (now defunct). |
|
[xii] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 17(d) and (e). |
|
[xiii] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 33(1)(a) and (b). |
|
[xiv] |
Parliamentary Committees Act 2003,
section 33(1)(b). |
|
[xv] |
In November and December of 1999 a
further 22 Bills were introduced which were not considered by the
Committee until early 2000. Of these 22 Bills 16 had been given
the Royal Assent and had become Acts before the in coming Committee
had taken office. To overcome this gap in jurisdiction an amendment
was made to the Parliamentary Committees Act 1968 (section
4D(ba) ) which allowed the Committee jurisdiction to prepare a report
on those Acts and table the report in Parliament. Of the 22 Bills
introduced in November and December of 1999, 3 had section 85 Constitution
Act 1975 provisions. |
|
[xvi] |
The Queen v. Hughes (2000) 171 ALR 155 |
|
[xvii] |
Budgets and expenditure include current inquiry
budgets, staff salaries, superannuation and training, office expenses,
Members allowances and travel. |
Scrutiny
of Acts and Regulations Committee
©
Parliament of Victoria |